Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1983 )


Menu:
  • ,
    A
    The Attorney           General       of Texas
    March 10, 1983
    JIM MAlTOX
    Attorney General
    Mr. Leonard IL.0. Sueerman             Opinion No. JM-8
    Supreme Court Building         President
    P. 0. BOX 1254B                Texes Southern University              Re:   Whether Texas Southern
    Austin. TX.‘.78711- 2546       Eouston. Texas   77004                 University must pay a claim
    51214752501
    under the Texas Relocation
    Telex 9wa7c1367
    Telecopier   512l4750286
    Assistance Program established
    by article 3266b. V.T.C.S.
    1607 Main Sl.. Suite luxl      Dear Mr. Speerman:
    Dallas. TX. 75201”t704
    214/74Z.B944
    In your recent request for an opinion you asked the following
    questions:
    4824 Alberta Ave.. Suite 180
    El Paso. TX. 79905.2793                    1. Whether the Texas Relocation Assistance
    Fw33.3484
    Program, article 3266b, V.T;C.S.. applies to
    institutions of higher education.
    1220 Dallas Ave.. Suite 202
    Housto”. TX. 770026998                      2a. Whether Texes Southern University is
    7 1365w666
    obligated to reimburse the owners of property it
    acquires for the cost of closing and moving
    IN6 Broadway. Suite 312                  expenses under article 3266b. V.T.C.S.
    Lubbock. TX. 79401.3479
    8081747.5238                                b. Whether payment of one claim would require
    payment to all potential claimants.
    4309 N. Tent!!. Suite B
    McAllen. TX. 78501.1595                     3. Whether such payments are subject to any
    512i662.4547                             limitation on their amounts.
    Article 3266b. V.T.C.S.. provides in pertinent pert:
    200 Main Plaza. Suite 400
    San Antonio. TX. 792052797
    5121225.4191                               Section 1. When in the acquisition of real
    property for a program or project undertaken by
    any department, agency, or instrumentality of this
    An Equal Opportunityl
    State or of a political subdivision of this State
    Affirmative Action Employer
    it becomes necessary that any individual, family,
    property of e business concern. farm or ranch
    operation, or nonprofit organization be displaced,
    they may be paid their moving expenses and
    relocation paymants, provided financial assistance
    /-                                          to acquire replacement housing, or allowed rental
    supplements   and   compensation    for   expenses
    p. 30
    Mr. Leonard H. 0. Spear-man- Page 2   (JM-8)
    incidental to the transfer of property to the
    State, all of which payments or expenditures are
    hereby declared to be an expense and cost of such
    property acquisition. Each department. agency, or
    instrumentality of this State or of a political
    subdivision of this State shall formulate the
    rules and regulations necessary to carry out the
    provisions of this section and shall not authorize
    payments or expenditures in excess of those
    authorized by or under the Federal Uniform
    Relocation Assistance of Real Property Acquisition
    Policies Program.
    ....
    Sec. 2. Each department, agency or instrumen-
    tality of this State or of a politicel subdivision
    of this State may provide a relocation advisory
    service for all individuals, families, business
    concerns. farm and ranch operations, and non
    profit organizations which shsll be compatible
    with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance
    Advisory program.
    The language of article 3266b makes it applicable to "any department.   ?
    agency. or instrumentality of the State or of a political subdivision
    of the State," and institutions of higher education are agencies of
    the state. See Attorney General Opinions H-1116 (1978); R-365 (1974).
    Texas South=    University is an institution of higher education.
    Educ. Code 561.003(3), (4). (7). Therefore, it is subject to article
    3266b.
    The question of whether or not Texas Southern University is
    obligated to make payments under article 3266b to owners of property
    acquired by the university for the purpose of expanding its campus
    facilities depends on whether the provisions of article 3266b are
    mandatory or permissive in nature.      Section 1 of article 3266b
    provides that persons whose property is acquired under those
    circumstances to which the statute is made applicable "may be paid"
    their moving and other specified expenses. Although the word "may" is
    sometimes construed se if it were "shell," It is ordinarily used as a
    word of permission, end, before treating it as a word of command,
    there should be something either in the subject matter or the context
    to indicate an intention that it be employed in that sense. San
    Angelo National Bank v. Fitzpatrick, 
    30 S.W. 1053
    . 1054 (Tex. 1895).
    To place article 3266b in context requires an examination of the
    history of relocation assistance legislation.
    p. 31
    Mr. Leonard H. 0. Spearman - Page 3    (Jh-8)
    The Federal Highway Relocation Assistance Act (formerly 23
    U.S.C.. sections 501 thru 512) was enacted August 23, 1968, by Public
    Law 90-495. 82 Stat. 830-34. Public Law 90-495 provided in pertinent
    part:
    Section 502. Assurances of adequate relocation
    assistance program.
    The Secretary shell not approve any project
    under section 106 or section 117 of this title
    which will cause the displacement of any person,
    business, or farm operation unless he receives
    satisfactory assurances from the State highway
    department that --
    (1) fair and reasonable relocation and other
    payments shall be afforded to displaced persons in
    accordance with sections 505. 506, and 507 of this
    title;
    (2) relocation assistance programs offering
    the services described in section 508 of this
    title shall be afforded to displaced persons.
    In its original form, article 3266b was enacted by the Sixty-first
    Legislature as article 6674n-4. Acts 1969, 61st Leg., ch. 45, at 133.
    The original enactment, while substantially similar to the present
    statute, referred only to the acquisition of rights of way for stste
    highWayS. Article 6674n-4 provided in pertinent part:
    Section 1. When in the acquisition of right of
    the way for any highway designated by the State
    Highway Coxsaission as part of the State Highway
    System  it becomes necessary that any individual,
    family, property of a business concern, farm or
    ranch operation or non-profit organization be
    displaced they may be paid their moving expenses,
    relocation    payments,   be   provided   financial
    assistance to acquire replacement housing, or
    allowed rental supplements and compensated for
    expenses incidental to the transfer of property to
    the state all of which payments or expenditures
    are hereby declared to be an expense and cost of
    right of way acquisition.       The State Highway
    Commission    shall   formulate   the   rules   and
    regulations necessary to carry out the provisions
    of this section and shall not authorize payments
    or expenditures in excess of those authorized by
    the Federal Highway Relocation Assistance program.
    p. 32
    ,
    Mr. Leonard H. 0. Spearman - Page 4   \JM-6)
    ._
    ?
    Sec.  2.  The State Highway Cosaaissioa Shall
    provide a relocation advisory service for all
    individuals, families, business concerns, farm and
    ranch, operations, and non-profit organitations
    which shall be compatible with the Federal Highway
    Relocation Advisory program.
    It is cl.ear from the structure of article 6674n-4, its repeated
    reference to the Federal Highway Relocation Assistance Program and the
    time of its enactment, that it was passed as enabling legislation to
    permit the State Highway Department to comply with the requirements of
    the Federal Highway Relocation Assistance Act in acquiring rights of
    way for its federally-funded projects.
    The Uniform Relocation Assistsnce and Real Property Acquisition
    Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C.. sections 4601-4655, was enacted by
    Public Law 91-646. 84 Stat. 1894, and took effect January 2. 1971.
    This statute was patterned after the Federal Highway Relocation
    Assistance Act of 1968. above, and expanded its coverage   to include
    all federally funded projects requiring acquisition of real property.
    Like the Federal Highway Relocation Assistance Act of 1968, the
    Uniform Relocation Assistance and Reel Property Acquisition Policies
    Act of 1970 made the paymsnt of relocation assistance mandatory for
    federally funded projects.
    Article 6674n-4, V.T.C.S., was amended by the Sixty-second
    Legislature, effective August 30, 1971. to expand its coverage to
    include all departments, agencies, or instrumentalities of the state
    of Texas or any of its political subdivisions. Acts 1971, 62d Leg.,
    ch. 918. at 2817.
    These provisions were recodified in 1973, as the present article
    3266b. V.T.C.S., quoted previously. Acts 1973. 63d Leg., ch. 586, at
    1625.
    The practical effect of the amendments leading to the present
    article 3266b. following as they did the enactment of the Uniform
    Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of
    1970, was to expand the coverage    of .article 3266b to include all
    agencies, instrumentelities, and political subdivisions of the state,
    pursuant to the expansion in the scope of the Federal Relocation
    Assistance Program. This expansion was required for the same reason
    that the passage of the original article 6674n-4 was required, that
    IS. in order to enable the affected agencies to comply with the
    mandatory requirements of federal relocation assistance legislation.
    The provision that displaced persons "may be paid" relocation
    assistance payments has remained a feature of all enactments on this
    subject commencing with article 6674n-4 and continuing to the present
    article 3266b. This is consistent with the legislature's evident
    p. 33
    Mr. Leonard H. 0. Spearman - Page 5    (Jh-8)
    L,
    purpose of permitting state agencies receiving federal funds for
    programs which would require acquisition of real property to comply
    with federal requirements for such funding. It is reasonable to
    suppose that.an intention on the part of the legislature to command
    the state and its agencies and subdivisions to pay very extensive
    relocation assistance benefits, in all csses, would have been
    manifested by a change from the permissive language of these enabling
    acts to some form of mandatory language.
    It is clear that there is nothing in the subject matter or
    context of article 3266b to indicate that the word "may" was used in
    other than the permissive sense in which it is normally understood.
    The answer to your question 2a. then, is that article 3266b is
    not a mandatory provision and does not in its own terms obligate Texas
    Southern University to pay relocation assistance to owners of property
    acquired for the purpose of expanding its campus.
    In answer to your question 2b. should Texas Southern University
    elect to make relocation assistance payments, or be required to do so
    by federal law. such payments would have to be made in full compliance
    with the provisions of article 3266b. including that article's
    provisions concerning rule-making. If the university establishes a
    relocation advisory program either electively or in order to comply
    with federal law, it is consistent with the Federal Uniform Relocation
    Advisory Program. The university would then be required to make
    payments to all persons determined to be eligible under the rules thus
    established.
    Under terms of article 3266b. agencies making relocation
    assistance payments are expressly forbidden to "authorize payments or
    expenditures in excess of those authorized by or under the Federal
    Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies
    Program." In answer to your third question. then, the limit for any
    relocation assistance payment made under any such program in which
    Texas Southern University may elect to involve itself will be
    determined by consulting the provisions of the Uniform Relocation
    Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, cited
    previously, with respect to the particular type of payment to be made.
    SUMMARY
    Article 3266b, V.T.C.S.. is by its terms
    applicable to institutions of higher learning.
    Article 3266b. V.T.C.S., is permissive and not
    mandatory in nature and does not of its own force
    obligate any department, agency, instrumentality,
    or political subdivision of the state to make
    relocation assistance payments or to provide
    p. 34
    Mr. Leonard 8. 0. Spearman - Page 6      (JM-8)                       :
    relocation advisory services in connection with
    its acquisition of real property.        Should a
    department, agency. instrumantality, or politicel
    subdivision of the state elect to make relocation
    assistance   payments   and   provide   relocetion
    advisory services under article 3266b, or should
    it be required to do so by federal law, such
    payments should be made uniformly to all persons
    determined to be eligible under the rules required
    to be made under article 3266b. The limits for
    relocation assistance payments to be made under
    article 3266b have been set by the legislature by
    reference to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and
    Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. 42
    U.S.C., sections 4601-4655, and may be determined
    in each case by reference to the specific
    provisions of that act.
    -Jz#&
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    TOM GREEN
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney   General
    Prepared by William T. Palmer
    Assistant Attorney Ganeral
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilpin
    Jim Moellinger
    Willism T. Palmer
    p. 35
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-8

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1983

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017