Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  •                                  The Attorney                 General of Texas
    March 5. 1984
    JIM MATTOX
    Attorney General
    Rouorable Lloyd Crias                               opinion   No.      .JM-133
    Supreme Court Building
    P. 0. BOX 12546
    chairman
    Austin. TX. 76711. 2546        Committee on Labor and Employment                   Re: Whether an individual   may
    512,4752501                        Relations                                       serve simultaneously  as county
    Telex 9101674-1367             Texas Eouae of Representatives                      auditor and city councilman of
    Telecopier  512l4750265        P. 0. Box 2910                                      a city located in that county
    Austin.   Texas 78769
    1607 Main St.. Suite 1400
    Dallas. TX. 75201.4709         Dear Representative       Criaa:
    214/742-6944
    You inform us that an individual          was elected    to the city council
    4624 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160
    of Galveston,       Texas, and subsequently        was appointed         to be county
    El Paso. TX. 79905.2793        auditor    of Galveston      County.   The materials    included with your letter
    91515332464                    to this office      indicate    that  he receives    a salary from the county for
    hiss services     ae auditor       but draws uo aalary       from the city         in his
    official    capacity.      Questions have arisen aa to the propriety              of this
    d0   Dallas Ave.. Suite 2332
    Houston.   TX. 77002.6966
    person     occupying     both offices.       You ask whether          this    person     is
    713/65M666                     prohibited    by law from simultaneously        holding both offices,         and if so,
    whether the city office          is uow vacant.     You also ask whether article
    9aab.     V.T.C.S.,     or any other        law prohibits        this      person     from
    606 Broadway. Suite 312
    participating     in
    hbbock,  TX. 79401.3479
    606/747.5236
    (1) decisions       involving      a   city-created       tax
    reinvestment   zone.    or
    4309 N. Tenth. Suite 6
    McA,len. TX. 76501.1665
    (2) appointments   to the city's   park board of
    512,682-4547
    trustees. or any other matter involving    the county
    and park board requiring   city council action.
    2W Win Plaza. Suite 400
    San Antonio. TX. 76205.2797          Upon examination   of the relevant    statutes,     we conclude that the
    5121225.4191
    coavaon law doctrine     of incompatibility      prohibits     one person  from
    simultaneously   occupying  the  offices    of city     councilman   and county
    An Equal OppOrtunityI          auditor of a county in which the city is located.
    Affirmative Action Employer
    ,The doctrine    of    incompatibility       prohibits    one person     from
    occupying two offices    when one office may "thereby impose ita policies
    on the other or subject       it to control     in some other wav."     At tornev
    General Opinion JM-i29 (1984);        eee Thomas v. Abernathy County Lin;
    Independent  School District,       29o.W.       152 (Tex. Comm. App. 1927);
    State ex rel. Brennan v. Martin, 51 S.W,2d 815 (Tex. Civ. App. - San
    Antonio 1932, no writ).      In this respect,     we observe that city council
    members may authorize      agreements      between    the city    and county     to
    p. 562
    Honorable    Lloyd Crisa     - Page 2      (JM-133)
    provide    for,     inter    alla.   the following:     the creation     of regional
    planning    commission8 which are authorized          to contract with cities      and
    counties    for the performance of enumerated services.          see V.T.C.S. art.
    lOllm, 14; the construction            and payment of improvements necessary       for
    the public health and to promote efficient              sanitary   regulations,    see
    V.T.C.S.     art.     1015, 13; the construction        and supervision      of joint
    recreational      facilities      and programs. -see V.T.C.S. art. 1015c-1, 93.
    The county     auditor    is    appointed     pursuant   to article      1645,
    V.T.C.S.,   by the district     judge(s)    having jurisdiction     in the county.
    This office    has previously    determined that a county auditor may not be
    simultaneously      employed as a school        teacher    and a county probation
    officer.      Letter   Advisory     No. 65 (1973).         The county   auditor    is
    charged with the
    general oversight      of all the books and records of
    all the officers     of the county, district    or state.
    who may be      authorized    or required     by law to
    receive   or collect      any money,   funds,   fees.     or
    other property     for the use of, or belonging          to,
    the county;      and he shall      see   to the     strict
    enforcement of the law governing county finances.
    V.T.C.S. art. 1651.           The auditor is additionally         authorized      to examine
    the accounts        and orders of the commissioners              court,     all reports     of
    collections       of money for the county,           and cash in the hands of the
    county treasurer.          V.T.C.S. arts.    1653-1655.       Although the auditor may
    not    independently         order    the   expenditure       of    county      funds,    the
    commissioners        court may not expend funds without             the approval       of the
    county auditor.         Smith v. McCoy, 533 S.W.Zd 457, 459 (Tex. Civ. App. -
    Dallas 1976, writ dism’d).            The auditor in such instances            may withhold
    approval     of payments,       though the refusal       to approve payments may be
    neither     arbitrary     nor in contravention       of law.      
    Id. at 460.
           See also
    Jackson v. Leonard, 
    578 S.W.2d 879
    (Tex. Civ. G.                           - Rouaton[l4th
    Dist.]    1979. writ ref’d n.r.e.1.            Thus,    there are many instances            in
    which the duties           of the auditor       are likely       to conflict        with the
    performance of city council duties.              particularly      when the transfer        of
    funds or property            between    the city      and county        is   involved.      We
    conclude therefore          that the positions      of city councilman of Galveston
    and county auditor of Galveston County are incompatible                      as a matter of
    law.
    The incompatibility          of these two offices         invites    npplication     of
    the common law doctrine         of vacation:
    Persons who accept and qualify       for offices             that
    are incompatible    with offices   they already              hold
    ipso facto relinquish   their prior posts.
    p. 563
    Boaorable    Lloyd   CrfsS   - Page 3     (``-133)
    Attorney General Opinion MW-170 (1980).         See Purcell v. Carrillo.    
    349 S.W.2d 263
    (Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio-i-961,           no writ); Ramirez v.
    Flores,   
    505 S.W.2d 406
    (Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio 1973, writ ref'd
    n.r.e.);   Attorney General Opinions MU-170 (1980); H-155, E-117 (1973).
    Accordingly,    we conclude that the indlvldual     involved here vacated the
    office   of city    councilman when he accepted       the position   of county
    auditor.
    SUMMARY
    The common law doctrine          of incompatibility
    prohibit8    a Galveston   city    council   member from
    simultaneously     serving      as   Galveston     county
    auditor.
    JIrzJ&th
    Attorney   General   of Texas
    TOMGRREN
    First Assistant      Attorney   General
    DAVIDR. RICEARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney        General
    Prepared    by Rick Gilpin
    Assistant    Attorney General
    APPP.OVRD:
    OPINIONCOMMITTEE
    Rick Gilpin.   Chairman
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrison
    Jim Moellinger
    Nancy Sutton
    Bruce Youngblood
    p. 564
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-133

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017