-
The Attorney General of Texas March 5. 1984 JIM MATTOX Attorney General Rouorable Lloyd Crias opinion No. .JM-133 Supreme Court Building P. 0. BOX 12546 chairman Austin. TX. 76711. 2546 Committee on Labor and Employment Re: Whether an individual may 512,4752501 Relations serve simultaneously as county Telex 9101674-1367 Texas Eouae of Representatives auditor and city councilman of Telecopier 512l4750265 P. 0. Box 2910 a city located in that county Austin. Texas 78769 1607 Main St.. Suite 1400 Dallas. TX. 75201.4709 Dear Representative Criaa: 214/742-6944 You inform us that an individual was elected to the city council 4624 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160 of Galveston, Texas, and subsequently was appointed to be county El Paso. TX. 79905.2793 auditor of Galveston County. The materials included with your letter 91515332464 to this office indicate that he receives a salary from the county for hiss services ae auditor but draws uo aalary from the city in his official capacity. Questions have arisen aa to the propriety of this d0 Dallas Ave.. Suite 2332 Houston. TX. 77002.6966 person occupying both offices. You ask whether this person is 713/65M666 prohibited by law from simultaneously holding both offices, and if so, whether the city office is uow vacant. You also ask whether article 9aab. V.T.C.S., or any other law prohibits this person from 606 Broadway. Suite 312 participating in hbbock, TX. 79401.3479 606/747.5236 (1) decisions involving a city-created tax reinvestment zone. or 4309 N. Tenth. Suite 6 McA,len. TX. 76501.1665 (2) appointments to the city's park board of 512,682-4547 trustees. or any other matter involving the county and park board requiring city council action. 2W Win Plaza. Suite 400 San Antonio. TX. 76205.2797 Upon examination of the relevant statutes, we conclude that the 5121225.4191 coavaon law doctrine of incompatibility prohibits one person from simultaneously occupying the offices of city councilman and county An Equal OppOrtunityI auditor of a county in which the city is located. Affirmative Action Employer ,The doctrine of incompatibility prohibits one person from occupying two offices when one office may "thereby impose ita policies on the other or subject it to control in some other wav." At tornev General Opinion JM-i29 (1984); eee Thomas v. Abernathy County Lin; Independent School District, 29o.W. 152 (Tex. Comm. App. 1927); State ex rel. Brennan v. Martin, 51 S.W,2d 815 (Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio 1932, no writ). In this respect, we observe that city council members may authorize agreements between the city and county to p. 562 Honorable Lloyd Crisa - Page 2 (JM-133) provide for, inter alla. the following: the creation of regional planning commission8 which are authorized to contract with cities and counties for the performance of enumerated services. see V.T.C.S. art. lOllm, 14; the construction and payment of improvements necessary for the public health and to promote efficient sanitary regulations, see V.T.C.S. art. 1015, 13; the construction and supervision of joint recreational facilities and programs. -see V.T.C.S. art. 1015c-1, 93. The county auditor is appointed pursuant to article 1645, V.T.C.S., by the district judge(s) having jurisdiction in the county. This office has previously determined that a county auditor may not be simultaneously employed as a school teacher and a county probation officer. Letter Advisory No. 65 (1973). The county auditor is charged with the general oversight of all the books and records of all the officers of the county, district or state. who may be authorized or required by law to receive or collect any money, funds, fees. or other property for the use of, or belonging to, the county; and he shall see to the strict enforcement of the law governing county finances. V.T.C.S. art. 1651. The auditor is additionally authorized to examine the accounts and orders of the commissioners court, all reports of collections of money for the county, and cash in the hands of the county treasurer. V.T.C.S. arts. 1653-1655. Although the auditor may not independently order the expenditure of county funds, the commissioners court may not expend funds without the approval of the county auditor. Smith v. McCoy, 533 S.W.Zd 457, 459 (Tex. Civ. App. - Dallas 1976, writ dism’d). The auditor in such instances may withhold approval of payments, though the refusal to approve payments may be neither arbitrary nor in contravention of law.
Id. at 460.See also Jackson v. Leonard,
578 S.W.2d 879(Tex. Civ. G. - Rouaton[l4th Dist.] 1979. writ ref’d n.r.e.1. Thus, there are many instances in which the duties of the auditor are likely to conflict with the performance of city council duties. particularly when the transfer of funds or property between the city and county is involved. We conclude therefore that the positions of city councilman of Galveston and county auditor of Galveston County are incompatible as a matter of law. The incompatibility of these two offices invites npplication of the common law doctrine of vacation: Persons who accept and qualify for offices that are incompatible with offices they already hold ipso facto relinquish their prior posts. p. 563 Boaorable Lloyd CrfsS - Page 3 (``-133) Attorney General Opinion MW-170 (1980). See Purcell v. Carrillo.
349 S.W.2d 263(Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio-i-961, no writ); Ramirez v. Flores,
505 S.W.2d 406(Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio 1973, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Attorney General Opinions MU-170 (1980); H-155, E-117 (1973). Accordingly, we conclude that the indlvldual involved here vacated the office of city councilman when he accepted the position of county auditor. SUMMARY The common law doctrine of incompatibility prohibit8 a Galveston city council member from simultaneously serving as Galveston county auditor. JIrzJ&th Attorney General of Texas TOMGRREN First Assistant Attorney General DAVIDR. RICEARDS Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared by Rick Gilpin Assistant Attorney General APPP.OVRD: OPINIONCOMMITTEE Rick Gilpin. Chairman Colin Carl Susan Garrison Jim Moellinger Nancy Sutton Bruce Youngblood p. 564
Document Info
Docket Number: JM-133
Judges: Jim Mattox
Filed Date: 7/2/1984
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017