Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  •                                        The Attorney             General of Texas
    JIM MATTOX                                             February 23, 1984
    Attorney General
    Supreme Court Building           Mr. Kenneth Il.Ashworth                        Opinion No. JM-129
    P. 0. BOX 12548                  Colmrdssioner
    Austin, TX. 78711. 2549          Coordinating Board                             He:  Whether a member of a
    512/475-2501
    Telex 9101874.1387
    Texas College and University System            board of trustees of a com-
    Telecopier   5121475.0266        P. 0. Box 12788, Capitol Station               munity college w      aerve
    Austin, Texas   78711                          simultaneously as a county
    commissioner
    714 Jackson, Suite 700
    Dallas, TX. 75202.4508
    2141742.8944
    Dear Mr. Ashworth:
    On behalf of the Dallas County Community College District, you
    4024 Alberta   Ave., Suite 160   ask:
    El Paso, TX. 79905-2793
    915/533-3424
    Whether a member of a Board of Trustees governed
    P                                                    by section 130.082 of the Education Code,
    All Texas. Suite 700                           V.T.C.S., may serve simultaneously as a county
    Houslon, TX. 77002.3111                          commissioner?
    7131223-5886
    Section 130.082 of the Education Code relates to the election of
    806 Broadway, Suite 312
    trustees for all junior college districts other than those managed by
    Lubbock. TX. 79401-3479          the governing board of an independent school district. A trustee of
    806/747-5238                     the Dallas County Community College District wishes to serve as a
    county commissioner in Dallas County. The boundaries of the junior
    college district are coterminous with the county boundaries. See
    43M) N. Tenth. Suite S
    McAllen, TX. 78501~1095          Attorney General Opinion C-533 (1965). A representative of the junior
    5121682.4547                     college has informed us that each of the district's seven campuses is
    located within the boundaries of an incorporated city, and that the
    junior college does not now own any property in the unincorporated
    200 Main Plaza, Suite 400
    part of Dallas County.
    San Antonio, TX. 78205.2797
    5121225-4191
    On examination of the statutes governing the district, we have
    determined that the common law doctrine of incompatibility prohibits
    An Equal Opportunltyl            the dual service inquired about. Hence, we need not address any
    Affirmative Action Employer
    issues that might be raised by any constitutional provision on dual
    office holding. -See Tex. Const. art. II, 91, and art. XVI, 540.
    The common law doctrine of incompatibility prevents one person
    from accepting two offices where  one office might thereby impose its
    policies on the other or subject it to control in some other way. See
    Thomas V. Abernathy County Line Independent School District, 290 ST
    152 (Tex. Comm. App. 1927); State V. Martin, 
    51 S.W.2d 815
    (Tex. Civ.
    p. 547
    Mr. Kenneth H. Ashworth - Page 2     (JM-129)
    APP. - San Antonio 1932, no writ). Compare Letter Advisory No. 114
    (1975) with Letter Advisory No. 149 (1977).
    For example, section 130.121 of the Education Code provides that
    the governing board of a junior college district may have its taxable
    property "assessed and/or its taxes collected, in whole or in part, by
    the tax assessors and/or tax collectors, respectively, of any county,
    city, taxing district, or other governmental subdivision in which all
    or any part of the junior college district is located." See Attorney
    General Opinion JM-35 (1983). Under this provision theTrustees of
    Dallas County Community College may require the tax assessor-collector
    of Dallas County to assess and collect its taxes, even if this service
    interferes with his county responsibilities, for example, by slowing
    the assessment and collection of county taxes. In addition, the
    commissioners court controls the budget of the tax assessor-
    collector's office under section 3912k. V.T.C.S.
    The county and the junior college district could have conflicting
    interests with respect to tax collection and one person serving as
    junior college trustee and county commissioner could not serve the
    best interests of both. We conclude that section 130.121 creates an
    incompatibility between the two offices.
    Moreover, the county commissioners way, with the consent of the
    city, improve city streets which form an integral part of the county
    road system or a connecting link with it. See Attorney General
    Opinion H-1018 (1977). Section 2.04 of the Education Code provides as
    follows:
    No public road shall be opened across land owned
    and used by any school district or other
    educational institution covered by this code
    without the consent of the regents, directors, or
    trustees of that institution and approval of the
    governor, unless the land is subject to sale under
    the general laws of Texas. The roads already
    opened across such land may be closed by the
    authorities in charge whenever they deem it
    necessary to protect the interest of           the
    institution and on repayment with eight percent
    interest of the amount actually paid out as
    appears on the records of the cormnissionerscourt,
    by the situs county for the land's condemnation.
    We have been informed that no city or county roads cross the junior
    college campuses, with one minor exception. However, we do not know
    whether any campus is situated on the route of a possible extension of
    a county road or connecting link between county roads. If one is so
    situated, the duties of the county commissioners might come into
    p. 548
    Mr. Kenneth H. Ashworth - Page 3   (JM-129)
    conflict with those of the junior college trustees. A trustee who
    also served as county commissioner might let county policy influence
    his vote on consent under section 2.04 of the Education Code, thus
    subordinating the junior college district's interests to the county's.
    Furthermore, since the boundaries of the district and the county
    are coterminous, the potential for other conflict always exists. For
    all of these reasons, one person may not serve as Trustee of Dallas
    County Community College and at the same time serve as Dallas County
    Commissioner.
    SUMMARY
    The common law doctrine of incompatibility
    prevents a trustee of Dallas County Colmaunity
    College from simultaneously serving as Dallas
    County Commissioner.
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    TOM GREEN
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Susan L. Garrison
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Rick Gilpin, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrison
    Jim Moellinger
    Nancy Sutton
    Bruce Youngblood
    p. 549
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-129

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017