Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1981 )


Menu:
  •                                    The Attorney                General of Texas
    December 22, 1981
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Supreme Court Building
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell                           Opinion No.m-416
    P. 0. Box 12546                COlIUUiSSiOIler
    Austin, TX. 76711              Texas Rehabilitation Commission                Re:   Whether article 4350,
    5121475.2501                   118 East Riverside Drive                       V.T.C.S., may be used to assist
    Telex 9101674-1367
    Austin, Texas   78704                          the    Texas    Rehabilitation
    Telecopier   512/4750266
    Commission in the collection
    of money due from rehabilita-
    1607 Main St., Suite 1400                                                     tion facilities in default
    Dallas, TX. 75201
    21417428944
    Dear Mr. Arrell:
    4024 Alberta Ave., Suite 160        You have requested our opinion on whether article 4350, V.T.C.S.,
    El Paso, TX. 79905             authorizes the comptroller of public accounts to withhold the issuance
    915/533-3464                   of warrants to an independent school district acting as fiscal agent
    for a private nonprofit rehabilitation entity, where financial audit
    1220 Dallas Ave., Suite 202
    exceptions have been taken on an establishment grant made by the
    Houston, TX. 77002             commission.   Such grants may be made for the establishment of
    71rY650-0666                   nonprofit rehabilitation facilities pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act
    of 1973. 29 U.S.C. §§706(4), 711(c), 723(b). See also Human Res.
    Code $5111.054, 111.056. You have submitted correspondence and
    SO6 Broadway, Suite 312
    Lubbock, TX. 79401
    documents concerning a grant made to an independent school district as
    606/747-5236                   fiscal agent for a Multi-County Special Education Cooperative serving
    a number of school districts. The governing board of the cooperative
    consists of the fiscal agent and three elected members who are school
    4309 N. Tenth, Suite 6
    superintendents of participating schools. The grant application was
    McAllen, TX. 76501
    51216624547
    signed by the superintendent of the school district serving as fiscal
    agent.   Correspondence relating to the audit of the grant and
    requesting a refund of the entire grant award was also addressed to
    200 Main Plaza, Suite 400      him. Our opinion, necessarily, is limited to the facts and questions
    San Antonio, TX. 76205
    you present.
    512/225-4191
    Article 4350, V.T.C.S., reads as follows:
    An Equal Opportunity/
    Affirmative Action Employer                      No warrant shall be issued to any person indebted
    or owing delinquent taxes to the State, or to his
    agent or assignee, until such debt or taxes are
    paid.
    In our opinion, the school district is not indebted to the state
    within the meaning of article 4350. Therefore, we need not consider
    whether the statute applies to warrants to be issued to a school
    p. 1418
    Mr.   Vernon M. Arrell - Page 2    (MW-416)
    district. Your question raises the issue of whether an independent
    school district in the capacity of fiscal agent for nonprofit
    rehabilitation entity that has received an establishment grant becomes
    "indebted" to the state when financial audit exceptions are taken
    thereunder by the Texas Rehabilitation Commission. To resolve this
    issue, initially we turn to the language of the agreement accompanying
    your request. This agreement is the document entitled "Application
    for an Establishment Grant...," which provides the following terms and
    conditions:
    (1) Grant funds will be utilized to develop
    rehabilitation   services     for    handicapped
    individuals.
    (2)    Programs and    procedures will    be
    initiated to enable the applicant organization to
    make substantial progress toward meeting the
    standards developed by the Texas Rehabilitation
    Commission.
    (3)   Appropriate, complete and detailed
    administrative and financial records will be
    maintained in accordance with instructions from
    the Texas Rehabilitation Commission. Such records
    will be made available for audit at the
    commissioner's request.
    (4)   The Assurance of Compliance (Form
    HEW-441) previously filed or attached hereto,
    applies to this project.
    (5)   If staff    is involved, salaries and
    qualifications will    be commensurate with the
    duties performed.
    (6) Matching funds made available by the
    applicant will not be used to obtain any other
    Federal funds.
    The foregoing, including agreement to comply with all guidelines,
    rules, and other appropriate regulatory matter provided by the Texas
    Rehabilitation and Service Administration, is subscribed to by the
    independent school district and would appear to represent its complete
    undertaking. Clearly, no express statement with respect to financial
    liability is present in the application.
    Over the years, this office has addressed a number of questions
    on the scope of article 4350, V.T.C.S. In a fairly recent Letter
    Advisory, this office stated that for a warrant to be validly
    p. 1419
    .   ,.
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Page 3     (MW-416)
    withheld, the article requires that a debt be established either by
    agreement between the state and the debtor; by the state's proper
    allegation of the existence of a debt by statutory reference; or by
    some other lawfully effective means. Letter Advisory No. 57 (1973).
    Even earlier, this office concluded that a warrant should not issue
    under circumstances where a statute required the comptroller to
    disallow a refund claim. Attorney General Opinion O-2765 (1941).
    Again, a    later opinion involving local government, approved
    withholding delivery of a warrant by statutory authority. Attorney
    General Opinion O-4824 (1942). These opinions established that
    warrants may be withheld only on a proper statutory allegation of the
    existence of the debt, either by agreement or by lawfully effective
    means. Conversely, there is no authority to withhold warrants under
    article 4350, V.T.C.S., where there is a contrary statute. Attorney
    General Opinion O-4655 (1942); or where no "debt" exists in the usual
    and ordinary sense of the word. Attorney General Opinion O-5249
    (1943).
    On the basis of the instruments and correspondence presented with
    your request, we are of the opinion that the terms, conditions and
    assurances in the "Application for an Establishment Grant...,"
    constitute a full and complete agreement between the subscribing
    independent school district and the commission. We find nothing,
    express or implied, in the agreement found in the application that
    would support financial liability on the part of the district for
    audit exceptions that may ultimately be taken by the commission. It
    follows that a subscribing independent school district does not become
    "indebted" to the state under article 4350, V.T.C.S., solely by virtue
    of its role as fiscal agent for a private nonprofit rehabilitation
    facility or entity, in the absence of an agreement or statutory
    authority to the contrary. Accordingly, if there is no "debt"
    established, the comptroller of public accounts is without authority
    to withhold warrants otherwise due and payable to the district.
    You inquire further, if article 4350, V.T.C.S.. reaches the
    private nonprofit rehabilitation entity alone. We would conclude, in
    this instance, that the debt must first be established by a lawfully
    effective means, s,      become an established legal obligation, by
    which is meant such obligation as would form the basis of a judgment
    in a court of competent jurisdiction.
    Finally, you ask if an applicable statute of limitation would
    foreclose a civil action against either the independent school
    district or the private nonprofit facility. With respect to the
    state, article 5517, V.T.C.S., reads in part: "The right of the
    state. all counties, incorporated cities and all school districts
    shall not be barred by any of the provisions of this Title...." The
    title referred to is Title 91, V.T.C.S., Limitations. We believe that
    if a debt owed the state is established, limitations will not be a bar
    p. 1420
    Mr. Vernon M. Arrell - Page 4     (MW-416)
    to the state's right of action. Hemphill County v. Adams, 
    408 S.W.2d 926
    (Tex. 1966). However, with respect to the independent school
    district, the state, in effect, would be suing itself. Under article
    4413 (32~). section 3(l), V.T.C.S., a school district is defined as a
    "local government" and political subdivision of the State of Texas.
    As to a private nonprofit entity, applicable provisions of Title 91,
    V.T.C.S., control.
    SUMMARY
    The state comptroller of public accounts is
    without authority under article 4350, V.T.C.S., to
    withhold warrants otherwise due and payable to an
    independent school district acting as fiscal agent
    for a private nonprofit rehabilitation entity that
    has received an establishment grant from the Texas
    Rehabilitation Commission, where      such   grant
    becomes subject to the financial audit exceptions
    under the existing application for grant funds
    presently in use by the commission.
    AZ%
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICHARD E. GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Ward A. White
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilpin
    Eva Loutzenhiser
    Jim Moellinger
    Ward A. White
    p. 1421
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-416

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1981

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017