Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1981 )


Menu:
  •                                             The Attorney           General of Texas
    December 10, 1981
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Supreme      Court Building
    Honorable Bob Bullock                   Opinion No. MW-408
    P. 0. BOX 12546                           Comptroller of Public Accounts
    Austin,    TX. 76711                      LBJ State Office Building               Ik: Validity of city ordinance
    5121475-2501                              Austin, Texas   78774                   requiring  taxpayers to file
    Telex    9101674-1367
    copy of sales tax return with
    Telecooier     51214750266
    city
    1607 Main St., Suite         1400         Dear Mr. Bullock:
    Dallas,   TX. 75201
    2141742.6944
    You have requested an opinion from this office on the following
    questions:
    4624 Alberta       Ave., Suite      160
    El Paso, TX.       79905                                1. May a city pass an ordinance requiring
    9151533.3464                                       vendors reporting local sales tax to file a copy
    of their sales tax return with the city?
    1220 Dallas Ave., Suite            202
    Houston,   TX. 77002                                     2. May a home rule city pass an ordinance
    71316500666                                         requiring vendors reporting local sales tax to
    file a copy of their sales tax return with the
    city?
    606 Broadway,        Suite   312
    Lubbock,     TX.    79401
    6061747.5236                                             3.   If a copy of the vendor's sales tax
    return may be required by the city, is the city
    legally obligated to keep the return confidential?
    4309 N. Tenth, Suite         B
    McAllen,     TX. 76501
    5121662.4547
    Article 1066c, V.T.C.S., the Local City Sales and Use Tax Act, was
    originally enacted in 1967 and allows the city to adopt a local sales
    and use tax. The act clearly imposes the tax only on those items
    200 Main Plaza, Suite 400                 subject to the state sales and use tax. Section 5(a) of the act
    San Antonio,  TX. 76205
    provides that:
    5121225-4191
    the comptroller shall perform all functions
    An Equal      Opportunity1                          incident to    the   administration, collection,
    Affirmative     Action     Employel                 enforcement, and operation of the tax, and the
    Comptroller shall collect, in addition to the
    Limited Sales, Excise and Use Tax for the State of
    Texas, an additional tax under the authority of
    this Act of one percent (l%).... The tax imposed
    hereunder and the tax imposed under the Limited
    Sales, Excise and Use Tax Act shall be collected
    together, if both, are imposed, and reported upon
    p. 1391
    Honorable Bob Bullock - Page 2   (MW-408)
    such forms and under such administrative rules and
    regulations as     may  be   prescribed by     the
    Comptroller....
    Sections 5(b), (c). and (d) require the comptroller to make reports on
    tax collections to a city if requested. These provisions underscore
    the legislative intent that a city look to the comptroller for
    information.
    Section 6 of the act provides that:
    [tlhe  following provisions shall govern the
    collection by the Comptroller of the tax imposed
    by this Act:     A.   All applicable provisions
    contained in Chapters 1 and 20 of Title 122A shall
    apply to the collection of the tax imposed by this
    Act, except as modified in this Act.
    Other provisions of the act, such as sections 2(G), (I). (J),
    (K), 4, 6c, and 6d, make it clear that the comptroller is the sole
    administrator and collector of the tax, but that the city has a right
    to sue in its own behalf. A prior opinion of this office, Attorney
    General Opinion H-274 (1974), concluded that the state comptroller is
    the sole collector of taxes under article 1066c, V.T.C.S., although
    cities may independently file suit for such taxes and any such tax
    monies received by the cities shall be remitted to the state
    comptroller for deposit in the state treasury for the city's benefit.
    With respect to the authority of cities, no city may pass a law
    in conflict with a general statute. Such a statute, if adopted,
    supersedes the conflicting provisions of the city charter. 45 Tex.
    Jur.2d Municipal Corporations, §115. Where the state of Texas has
    adopted a general law and applied it to cities of a certain class, no
    city may pass legislation in conflict with the general enactment.
    Beaumont v. Fall, 
    291 S.W. 202
    (Tex. 1927). A city is prohibited, not
    only from enacting local laws in direct conflict with statutes or
    constitutional provisions, but also from entering a field of
    legislation which has been occupied by general legislation. city of
    Lubbock v. South Plains Hardware, 
    111 S.W.2d 343
    (Tex. Civ. App. -
    Amarillo 1937, no writ). Any reasonable doubt as to the existence of
    a power is resolved by the courts against a city. Foster v. City of
    Waco, 
    255 S.W. 1104
    (Tex. 1923). A city can exercise only those
    powers expressly or impliedly conferred by law, and powers will be
    implied only when such grant is reasonably incident to those expressly
    granted or if essential to the purposes of the city. Anderson v. City
    of San Antonio, 
    67 S.W.2d 1036
    (Tex. 1934).
    The home rule amendment to the Texas Constitution, article XI,
    section 5, and the enabling legislation, article 1165, V.T.C.S.,
    authorizes full power of self-government for home rule cities. It is
    not necessary to look to the legislature for grants of power to home
    rule cities, but only for limitations on their power.           Such
    p. 1392
    Honorable Bob Bullock - Page 3      (MW-408)
    limitations may be express or implied. Lower Colorado River Authority
    V. City of San Antonio, 
    523 S.W.2d 641
    (Tex. 1975). However, article
    XI, section 5 of the Texas Constitution and article 1165, V.T.C.S.,
    both provide that a home rule charter ordinance shall not contain any
    provisions inconsistent with a general statute. See also Burch v.
    City of San Antonio, 
    518 S.W.2d 540
    (Tex. 1975); Berry v. City of Fort
    Worth, 
    124 S.W.2d 842
    (Tex. 1939). We believe that the legislature
    intended the comptroller to be the sole administrator and collector of
    local sales and use taxes pursuant to article 1066c, V.T.C.S., and
    that the cities' powers are limited to filing lawsuits to recover
    delinquent taxes. A city's request that a taxpayer file a local sales
    and use tax return with the city is inconsistent with the power
    granted the comptroller as administrator and collector of local sales
    and use taxes.
    Additionally, it should be noted that article 20.11(G)(l),
    Taxation-General, V.T.C.S., provides that "...a11 information secured,
    derived or obtained from any record, report, instrument or copy
    thereof, required to be furnished under the terms of this Chapter,
    shall be and shall remain confidential and not open to public
    'inspection." The words "this Chapter" refers to chapter 20 of the
    Texas Limited Sales and Use Tax Act, which has been made applicable to
    the collection of local sales and use taxes by section 6 of article
    1066c. V.T.C.S.    Thus, the confidentiality required by article
    20.11(G)(l) would be breached by the filing of copies of sales tax
    returns with a city.
    SUMMARY
    A city subject to the Local Sales and Use Tax
    Act may not by ordinance require a vendor to file
    with the city a copy of its sales tax return
    required by statute to be filed with the
    comptroller.
    MARK      WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICHARD E. GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Bradley Seals
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 1393
    Honorable Bob Bullock - Page 4   (MW-408)
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Rick Gilpin
    Jim Moellinger
    Bradley Seals
    p. 1394