Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1981 )


Menu:
  •                       The Attorney          General of Texas
    September 22, 1981
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Woodrow W. Mix, P.E.         Opinion   NO.   MW-368
    Executive Director
    Texas State Board of Registration      Re: License renewal
    for Professional Engineers           provisions of Texas
    P.O. Drawer 18329                      Engineering Practice Act
    Austin, Texas 78760
    Dear Mr. Mize:
    You have requested our opinion regarding recently enacted
    licensing renewal provisions of article 3271a, V.T.C.S., the Texas
    Engineering Practice Act.
    Prior to its recent amendment, §16 of article 3271a provided
    that:
    It shall be the duty of the Board to notify
    every person registered under this Act of the date
    of the expiration of his certificate and the
    amount of the fee that shall be required for its
    renewal for one year; such notice shall be mailed
    at least one month in advance of the date of the
    expiration of said certificate. Renewal may be
    effected by payment of a renewal fee set by the
    Board not to exceed Forty-five Dollars ($45.00).
    The Board is hereby given authority and duty to
    determine the amount of such renewal fee required
    to effectively carry out the administration and
    enforcement of all the provisions of this     Act.
    Failure on the part of any registered engineer to
    renew his certificate annually shall not deprive
    such person of the right of renewal, but the fee
    to be paid for the renewal of a certificate when
    the renewal is past due shall be increased ten
    percent (10%) for each month or fraction of a
    month that renewal payment is delayed; provided,
    however, that the maximum fee for delayed renewal
    shall not exceed twice the normal renewal fee.
    Senate Bill No. 402. Acts 1981, 67th Leg., ch. -,               *t -,
    amended section 16 to read, in its entirety:,
    Woodrow W. Mize - Page 2   (MW-368)
    "Section 16. EXPIRATIONS AND RENEWALS. (5) It
    shall be the duty of the Board to notify every
    person registered under this Act of the date of
    the expiration of his certificate and the amount
    of the~fee that shall be required for its renewal
    for one year; such notice shall be mailed at least
    one month in advance of the date of the expiration
    of said certificate.
    (b) A person may renew an unexpired license
    by paying to the Board before the expiration date
    of the license the required renewal fee.
    (c) I'f a person's license has been expired
    for not longer than 90 days, the person may renew
    the license by paying to,the Board the required
    renewal 'fee and a fee that is one-half of the
    application fee for the license.
    (d) If a person's license has been expired
    for longer than 90 days but less than two years,
    the person oay renew the license by paying to the
    Board all unpaid renewal fees and a fee that is
    equal to the application fee for the license.
    (e) If a person's license has been expired
    for two years or longer, the person may not renew
    the license. The person may obtain a new license
    by submitting to an examination to be determined
    by the Board and complying with the requirements
    and procedures for obtaining an original license.
    The amended version of section 16 became effective on September 1.
    1981. You ask:                 Y
    1.   Do the penalty provisions of Section ~16.
    subsections (c) and (d) apply to all licenses
    renewed after September 1, 1981, regardless
    of the date the license expired?
    2.   Can a license that has been expired for two
    years on September 1. 1981, be renewed?
    In effect, you ask whether Senate Bill No. 402 provides a grace for
    persons whose licenses have expired prior to September 1, 1981, the
    effective date bf the amendment.
    A literal reading of Senate Bill No. 402 indicates that its
    provisions are applicable to every licensee who occupies a particular
    status on September 1, 1981. Under such a construction, an individual
    whose license had expired on July 1, 1979, would not, under subsection
    p. 1232
    .   .   Vrwdrow   W.   Mize - Page 3    (MW-368)
    (e), he permitted to obtain a renewal, but would be required to
    fulfill the requirements for obtaining an original license.
    In our opinion, the amendment to section 16 is clear and
    unambiguous. A plain and unambiguous statute should be construed
    accordingly to its literal meaning. Brazes River Authority v. City of
    Graham, 
    354 S.W.2d 99
    , 109 (Tex. 1961). Furthermore, it is well
    established that exceptions to statutes may not ordinarily be i~mplied.
    Spears v. City of San Antonio, 
    223 S.W. 166
    , 169 (Tex. 1920); Stubbs
    v. Lowrey's Heirs, 
    253 S.W.2d 312
    , 313 (Tex. Civ. App. - Eastland
    1952, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Nail v. McCue, 
    55 S.W.2d 211
    , 213 (Tex. Civ.
    APP. - El Paso 1932, no writ). Where the legislature has intended to
    except certain classes of persons from the requirements of licensing
    statutes, or to provide a period of grace, it has done so in explicit
    terms. See, e.g., Acts 1975, 64th Leg., ch. 709, 53, at 2253 (persons
    engaged in business of structural pest control for a period of two
    years granted two-year grace period before having to comply with
    examination requirements); V.T.C.S. art. 6243-101 §lO (persons holding
    existing plumbing licenses from a city are exempt from examination
    requirements for state li~censingas plumber if they apply within 120
    days from effective date of statute); V.T.C.S. art. 4413(29aa) §6(a)
    (persons who were peace officers prior to effective date of statute
    need not meet certain requirements in order to continue employment as
    peace officers). We conclude that the penalty provisions of section
    16 apply to all licenses renewed after September 1. 1981, regardless
    of the date the license expired. In addition, a license.that expired
    more than two years prior to September 1, 1981, may not be renewed.
    SUMMARY
    The penalty provisions of the amendments to
    section 16 of article 3271a, V.Trznfw.,dapply to
    all    engineering   licenses              after
    September 1, 1981, regardless of the date the
    license expired. A license that has been expired
    for more than two years prior to September 1,
    1981, may not be renewed under the terms of the
    amendment.
    3=-&g
    MARK      WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICHARD E. GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    P. 1233
    Prepared by Rick Gilpin
    Assistant Attorney General
    ~APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Susan L. Garrison. Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Robert W. Gauss
    Rick Gilpin
    Jim Moellinger
    p. 1234
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-368

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1981

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017