Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1981 )


Menu:
  •                       The Attorney          General of Texas
    September 10, 1981
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Charles D. Travis             Opinion No. Mw-367
    Executive Director
    Texas Parks & Wildlife Department       Re: Authority of Department
    4200 Smith School Road                  of Parks & Wildlife to refund
    Austin, Texas 78744                     fees paid by Jacintoport for
    dredged material taken from
    Carpenter's Bayou
    Dear Mr. Travis:
    Your request for our opinion concerns a demand made by the
    Jacintoport Corporation for a refund of the $25,000 fee it paid to the
    Parks and Wildlife Department for the right to perform certain
    maintenance dredging. We understand the facts are as follows:
    In January, 1980, Jacintoport applied to the U.S. Army Corps of
    Engineers for a permit to perform maintenance dredging of a barge
    canal in the Carpenter's Bayou area. The Corps of Engineers declined
    to issue a permit, however, because of objections raised by the Parks
    and Wildlife Department. The department contended that because the
    state owned the materials to be dredged, it was authorized to charge
    Jacintoport a fee for their removal. Jacintoport paid a $25,000 fee
    and obtained its permit.
    Jacintoport has since demanded a refund of this fee. Among other
    things, it claims that it performed no dredging on state-owned
    property, and that the department therefore lacked authority to charge
    this fee. At the department's request, the General Land Office
    researched the question qf ownership of the canal, and advised the
    commissioner that the state has never claimed Carpenter's Bayou. We
    understand that you do not dispute this conclusion. Rather, your
    question is whether, acting in reliance on this information, the
    department may lawfully refund the $25,000 fee to Jacintoport.
    Section 86.002 of   the Parks and Wildlife Code provides, in
    paragraph (a), that:
    No person may disturb or take marl, sand, gravel,
    shell or mudshell under the management and
    protection of the commission...for any purpose
    other than that necessary or incidental to
    navigation or dredging under state or federal
    p. 1227
    Charles D. Travis - Page 2 (MW-367)
    authority without first having acquired from the
    commission a permit authorizing the activity.
    Marl and sand of commercial value and gravel, shell, and mudshell are
    under the commission's management and protection if located:
    within the tidewater limits of the state, and on
    islands within those limits, and within the
    freshwater areas of the state not embraced by a
    survey of private land, and on islands within
    those areas.
    Parks & Wild. Code 986.001. Section 86.012 of the code authorizes the
    cormnissionto sell these substances, and section 86.016 provides that
    the proceeds from their sale shall be deposited in the Special Came
    and Fish Fund (renamed Game, Fish, and Water Safety Fund; see Acts
    1979, 66th Leg., ch. 260 at 546).
    Section 11.031 et seq. of the code describes various funds in the
    state treasury, including the Game, Fish, and Water Safety Fund
    referred to above. Parks & Wild. Code 9511.031-11.034. Section
    11.040 provides as follows:
    (a) Any funds deposited in the state treasury by
    the department by mistake of fact or mistake of
    law shall be refunded by warrant    issued against
    the fund in the state treasury into which the
    money was deposited.    Refunds necessary to make
    the proper correction shall be appropriated by the
    general appropriations act.
    (b) The comptroller may require written evidence
    from the director of the department to indicate
    the reason for the mistake of fact or law before
    issuing the warrant authorized in Subsection (a)
    of this section.
    (c) This section does not apply to any funds that
    have been deposited under a written contract or to
    any funds on deposit as of June 8, 1971, which are
    the subject of litigation in any of the courts of
    this state or the United States.
    These provisions establish that if the land is not under the
    commission's management and protection, the commission lacked
    authority to charge Jacintoport a $25,000 fee for dredging materials
    therein. Section 11.040 authorizes the refund of funds deposited in
    the treasury under a "mistake of fact or mistake of law." In our
    opinion, a fee for dredging materials which the commission charged
    under an erroneous assumption that it had a duty to manage and protect
    them would be a deposit in the treasury under a "mistake of fact."
    -See Lusk V. Parmer, 
    114 S.W.2d 677
    (Tex. Civ. App. - Amarillo 1938,
    p. 1228
    .   .
    Charles D. Travis - Page 3   (MW-367)
    writ dism'd) (discussion of meaning of "mistake of fact"). Thus, the
    remaining question is whether the General Land Office's determination
    that the state has never claimed Carpenter's Bayou is sufficient
    authority for the commission properly to conclude that the dredged
    materials were not under its management and protection and, therefore,
    that a "mistake of fact" occurred.
    Sections 31.001 et seq. of the Natural Resources Code govern the
    General Land Office.    Section 31.011 provides that the General L.and
    Office "shall register all land titles emanating from the state if not
    prohibited by the constitution." See also Tex. Const. art. XIV, §I.
    Section 31.051 provides that the duties of the commissioner of that
    office consist, among other things, of executing and performing:
    (2) ...a11 acts and other things relating to
    public land of the state or rights of individuals
    in public land which is required by law....
    Ashby v. Ringstaff, 
    464 S.W.2d 891
    (Tex. Civ. App. - Austin 1971,
    writ ref'd n.r.e.), holds that the land commissioner has no power to
    adjudicate between rival claimants whose titles to land have become
    fixed. See also Atlantic Refining Co. v. Noel, 
    443 S.W.2d 35
    (Tex.
    1968) (commissioner has no power to divest or enlarge title to land by
    ordering and accepting resurvey). In this instance, however, the
    General Land Office is not attempting to resolve any dispute between
    rival claimants to Carpenter's Bayou, nor is it attempting to divest
    or enlarge any title to land.   On the contrary, we understand that it
    has merely concluded that its records indicate the state has never
    claimed Carpenter's Bayou. Since all land titles "emanating from the
    state" must be registered with the Land Office, we believe that office
    certainly has authority to examine those titles, as well as other maps
    and records in its files, and make an authoritative determination as
    to whether the state has ever claimed certain property. See Caples v.
    Cole, 102 S.W.Zd 173 (Tex. 1937) (commissioner's finding on issue of
    fact conclusive unless clearly illegal, unreasonable, or arbitrary);
    46 Tex. Jur. 2d Public Lands §§l-13. We further believe that the
    Parks and Wildlife Commission, acting in reliance on              this
    determination, may properly conclude that a "mistake of fact" has
    occurred within section 11.040, enabling it to refund the $25,000 fee
    to Jacintoport. Funds for this purpose were appropriated by the
    Sixty-Sixth Legislature. Acts 1979, 66th Leg., ch. 843, at 2698.
    It is argued in an accompanyl~ngbrief that the commission had no
    authority to charge the fee because (1) the material dredged was
    analyzed by a geotechnical consulting firm as clay and silt, rather
    than marl, sand, gravel, shell, or mudshell; and (2) section 86.002 of
    the Parks and Wildlife Code does not require a permit to be obtained
    unless the enumerated substances are taken for a purpose "other than
    that necessary or incidental to navigation or dredging under state or
    federal authority." -See Amdel Pipeline, Inc. v. State, 
    541 S.W.2d 821
            (Tex. 1976). We need not address these issues, however, because of
    our conclusion regarding the question you raise.
    p. 1229
    Charles I).Travis - Page 4    (MW-367)
    SUMMARY
    Acting in reliance on the General Land
    Office's determination that the state of Texas
    never claimed Carpenter's Bayou as state property,
    the Parks end Wildlife Department may lawfully
    refund the $25,000 fee it charged the Jacintoport
    Corporation for dredging materials therein.
    MARK      WHITE
    Attorney Genera.1of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICHARD E. GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Jon Bible
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Walter Davis
    Rick Gilpin
    Jim Moellinger
    Bruce Youngblood
    p. 1230
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-367

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1981

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017