Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1981 )


Menu:
  •                        The Attorney’General                         of Texas
    May 7, 1981
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Ron Jackson                       Opinion No. ``-334
    Executive Director
    Texas Youth Council                         Re: Whether teachers employed by
    8900 Shoal Creek Boulevard                  Texas Youth Council are entitled to
    Austin, Texas 78766                         longevity pay under article 6813d,
    V.T.C.S.
    Honorable George W. McNiel
    The State Auditor
    Sam Houston Office Building
    Austin, Texas 78711
    Your questions concern article SSlSd, V.T.C.S., and article II, section
    2a of House Bill 558, the General Appropriations Act, Acts 1979, 66th Leg.,
    ch. 843. Article 68134 provides that:
    . . .each state employee covered by the Position
    Classification Act of 1961, each line item or exempt
    state employee [andI each regular full-time hourly
    employee of the state. . . is entitled to longevity pay
    of a maximum of $4 per month for each year of
    service as an employee of the state up to and
    includfng 25 years of service.
    Article II, section 2a, of the appropriations   act provides as follows:
    (a) SALARY PROVISIONS.            (1)   EXEMPT
    POSITIONS. Positions employed in institutions. . . of
    the. . . Texas Youth Council, which are exempt from
    the Position Classification   Plan, shall be paid at
    annual salary rates not to exceed those specified in
    this Section. . . .
    . . . .
    (5) TEACHERS. Each. . . classroom -teacher. . .
    shall receive as a minimum salary the clessroom or
    exceptional teachers monthly salary rate, plus incre-
    ments specified in Senate Bill No. 116, Acts of the
    Fifty-first Legislature, 1949, as amended [see Public
    Education Compensation Plan, section 16.056 of the
    Education Code]. . . .
    p. 1082
    ‘    1
    Honorable Ron Jackson
    Honorable George W. McNiel
    Page Two    (Mu-334)
    Salary rates in excess of   the minimum amounts specified       in
    Senate Bill No. 116. . . may     be paid; but such approved rates
    shall never exceed the rates    of pay for like pOSitiOnS pard in the
    public schools of the city in   which the State School or Home is
    located. (Emphasis added)
    Acts1979,66th   Leg., ch. 843, art. II, §2a, at 2540, 43-44.
    Mr. Jackson asks the following questions:
    1. Are teachers employed by         the Texas Youth Council
    (TYC) state employees for purposes       of receiving longevity pay
    under article 6813d, when they          already receive a salary
    supplement for longevity under the      Texas State Public Educa-
    tion Compensation Plan?
    2. If they are, may the TYC authorize payment of longevity
    pay to a teacher when such payment would result in a higher
    salary rate than that paid fcirlike positions in the public schook
    of the city in which the state school is located, notwithstanding
    the provisions of article 11, section 2a(5) of the appropriations
    act?
    Mr. McNiel asks these questions:
    1. Should the state’s payment of a portion of the employee’s
    share of social security contributions required by Senate Bill
    No. 20, Acts of the Sixty-fifth Legislature, be considered. in
    calculating the salary rate of the teacher for comparison with
    the rates of pay for like positions in the public schook of the
    city in which the state school is located?
    2: Should the state’s contribution for the employee’s group
    insurance premiums be included in determining the teacher’s
    salary rate?
    We .will address both of Mr. Jackson’s questions at the same time. First, this
    office has previously held that TYC teachers are state employees for purposes of
    receivingpay    for accrued vacation time, Attorney General Opinion H-829 fl976), and
    sick leave, Attorney General Opinion H-775 (1976). While those opinions dealt with
    provisiorw of the 1975 appropriations act, we pemeive no basis for reaching a different
    conclusion with respect to whether they are%tate          employees” within article 6813d.
    We therefore conclude that, inasmuch as their positions are exempt from the Position
    Classification Plan, s     article II, section 2(a)(l) of the 1979 General Appropriations
    Act, TYC teachers are “exempt state employees” within article 6813d and are
    therefore eligible for longevity pay under that provision.
    p. 1083
    Honorable Ron Jackson
    Honorable George W. McNiel
    Page Three   (``-334)
    You ask whether the TYC may authorize payment of longevity pay ~to a TYC
    teacher “when such payment would result in a higher salary rate than that paid for like
    positions in the public schools of the city in which the state school is located.” If, as
    your question assumes, a TYC teacher’s “salary rate” would in fact be increased by the
    addition of such longevity pay, we would answer this question in the negative. It is our
    opinion, however, that a TYC teacher’s “salary rate”, as that term is used in article II,
    section 2a of the appropriations act, is computed on the basis of the k.salary       paid
    the teacher. Longevity pay which a TYC teacher receives pursuant to artrcle 6813d is
    not part of that base salary, and, therefore, is not to be considered when calculating
    the teacher’s “salary rate.” See General Appropriations Act, Acts 1979, 66th Leg., ch.
    843, art 11, S18, at, 2555, (ahod      for computing TYC teacher’s salary rates).     We
    therefore conclude that a TYC teacher may receive longevity pay under article 6813d
    without violating article II, section 2a(5) of the 1979 General Appropriations Act.
    We now turn to Mr. McNiel’s questions.        Article 695h, V.T.C.S., sets forth
    provisions governing federal old age survivors’ insurance coverage for state employees
    and defines the state’s obligations with respect to contributions on behalf of state
    employees under that program. Article 3.51 of the Insurance Code authorizes the state
    and its agencies to procure contracts with licensed insurance companies for purposes
    of insuring employees.    Section l(a) thereof provides that premiums may be paid in
    whole or in part from funds contributed by the employer and/or by the insured
    employees.
    Contributions made by the state on behalf of its employees under article 69511,
    V.T.C.S., and article 3.51 of the Insurance Code undeniably constitute a benefit which
    the employee receives by virtue of his employment.     However, we are here concerned
    only with the question of whether said contributions are to be considered in calculating
    a TYC teacher’s salary rate for purposes of comparing that rate to the salary rate
    established for a like position” in the public schook of the city in which the TYC
    facility is located. We answer that question in the negative.
    Unlike article 3.51 of the Insurance Code, article 695h expressly provides that
    contributions made by the state are not to be considered compensation under any law
    of this state. See V.T.C.S. art. 695h, S4. This provision, standing alone, would appear
    to answer youiirst      question.   However, even if article 695h contained no such
    provision, we would conclude that contributions made ,by the state under that statute,
    like those made under article 3.51 of the Insurance Code, should not be considered in
    computing a TYC teacher’s salary rate.        They do not constitute additions to the
    employee’s base salary. In our opinion, the legislature intended that, ~for purposes of
    calculating a TYC teacher’s “sslary rate” under the 1979 General Appropriations Act,
    only those amounts included in the teacher’s base salary should be considered.
    SUMMARY
    Teachers employed by the Texas Youth Council may receive
    longevity pay under article 6813d, V.T.C.S., without violating
    p. 1084
    Honorable Ron Jackson
    Honorable George W. McNiel
    Page Pour   (Mu-3341
    the provisiorm of article II, section 2a(51 of the 1979 General
    Appropriations Act. Ccntributions ma& by the state on behalf
    of a TYC teacher for purposes of social security and employees
    group insurance premiums are not to be considered in calcula-
    ting that teacher’s salary rate for purposes of article II, section
    2a(5) of the act.
    Very truly yours,
    MARK      WHITE
    Attorney General of Texes
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICHARD E. GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Jon Bible
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVRD:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilpin
    Edna Ramon
    Bruce Youngblood
    p. 1085
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-334

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1981

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017