Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1981 )


Menu:
  • .   -
    The Attorney              General          of Texas
    March 23, 1981
    Mr. E. C. Parker, Jr., President            Opinion No. MV-313
    Board of Directors
    Upper Guadalupe River Authority             Re: Whether the Upper Guadalupe
    P. 0. Box 1278                              River Authority may provide park
    Kerrville, Texas 78026                      and recreational facilities
    Dear Mr. Parker:
    You have asked whether the proposed construction of certainpark and
    recreational facilities by the Upper Guadalupe River Authority ,on its soon to
    be completed reservoir near the city of Kerrville would be in furtherance of
    -the purposes for which the district was created. You state that the proposed
    facilities construction includes “landscaping, making certain areas of the
    reservoir suitable for swimming, and providing parking areas, restroom
    facilities, boat ramps, picnic tables, lighting, roads, and fencing for the
    areas.”
    The Upper Guadalupe River Authority is a conservation and reclama-
    tion district created under and pursuant to article XVI, section 59 of the
    Texas Constitution and Acts 1939, 46th Legislature, chapter 5, as amended
    (codified as article 8280-124, V.T.C.S.). Article XVI, section 59 of the Texas
    Constitution states:
    Sec. 59. (a) The,conservation   and development   of
    its storm and flood waters, the waters of its rivers
    and streams, for irrigation, power and all other useful
    purposes,, the reclamation and irrigation of its arid,
    semt-and     and other lands needing irrigation, the
    reclamation and drainage of its over-flowed lands,
    and other lands needing drainage, the conservation
    and development of its forests, water and hydro-
    electric   power, the navigation of its inland and
    coastal waters, and the preservation and conservation
    of all such natural resources of the State a~ each
    and all hereby declared pubhc nghts and dutraq and
    the L&rIature     shall oass all such laws as may be
    approphate thereto.      -
    p. 995
    -   .
    Mr. E. C. Parker, Jr. - Page Two        (Mw-31%
    9~) There may be created within the State of Texas, or the
    State may be divided into, such number of conservation and
    reclamation districts as may be determined to be essential to
    the accomplishment of the purposes of this amendment to the
    constitution, which districts shall be governmental agencies and
    bodies politic and corporate with such powers of government
    and with the authority to exercise such rights, privilqes and
    ftmctions concerning the subject matter of this amendment g
    may be conferred by law. (Emphasis added).
    In 1971, the authority’s enabling legislation   was amended (Acts 1971, 62nd Legislature,
    chapter 430, at 1586-87) to read as follows:
    Sec. 16. (a) Without limiting the powers granted to the
    District by this Act, the District shall specifically have the
    rieht. oower. brivileze. flnction      and authoritv to control
    d&e&; store &td @serve the waters and flood-waters of the
    Upper Gusdaltxxr River and its tributaries within or without the
    boundaries of the District for any beneficial or useful purpose
    and to purchase, acauire. build. construct, improve, extend,
    reconat&t,     repair a& maintaln~ any and all dams, structure&
    waterworks systems, sanitary or storm aewer or drainage or
    irrigation systems, buildings, waterways, pipelines, distribution
    systems, ditches, lakes, ponds, reservoirs, plants, and recrea-
    tional facilities   for the public use and any and all other
    facibties   or equipment in aid thereof, and to purqhase or
    acauire the necessarv sites. easements, rights-of-way. land or
    ot6er properties necessary thereof and to io any and-all of the
    acts and things which may be necessary to the exercise of any
    and all of the rights, powers, privileges, functions and authority
    of the District, and same may be accomplished by any and all
    practical means, and the District may sell water and other
    services. (Emphasis addedL
    In 1975, the Attorney General rendered an opinion that the development of parks and
    recreational facilities by municipal utility districts created under article XVI, section
    59 of the Texas Constitution in the district16 program of developing and conserving the
    natural resources of the state is a constitutionally      permissible activity. Attorney
    General Opinion H-491 (1975L
    t1101. the court held that certain orooosed recreational facmes      to be built bv the
    met      would not serve the purpos& for which the district was created. This de&ion
    has apparently created doubts as to whether the river authorities of this state can
    construct recreational facilities on reservoirs
    In the Harris Camtg W.C.I.D. #llO opinion, Chief Justice Phillips states quite
    pointedly that “itl he question in this appeal is whether a municipal utility district may
    p. 996
    .       .
    .   .
    Mr. E. C. Parker, Jr. - Page Three           (MW-313)
    provide perk and recreational       facilities which include a community center, three
    s,wimming pools, four tennis courts, and a clubhouse. . . .‘I E at 853. (Emphasis
    added1 Thus, recreational facilities per se are not prohibited but rather, are limited
    by the standard set out by the court to-%:         “[tl he power to construct recreational
    facilities must be exercised to further a purpose of section 54.012 [Texas Water Code)
    to be justified and constitutionaL v Ia, at 854. The court had previously stated that
    “[$I ection 54.012 of the Texas Water Code, entitled ‘Purposes of a District,’ parallek
    the Muage      of article XVI, section 59(a) (Texas ConstitutionL” 
    Id. at 853.
    Implicit in
    the lquage      of the opinion is a question of the degree of relaTionship between the
    recreational facilities and the constitutional purpose of the district.
    Section lLO24 of the Texas Water Code, a legislative    statement   of public policy
    regarding the use of state waters, provides:
    In order to conserve and properly utilize state water, the
    public welfare requires not only recognition of beneficial uses
    but ako a constructive public policy regarding the preferences
    between these uses, and it is therefore declared to be the public
    policy of this state that in appropriating state water preference
    shall be given to the following uses in the order named:
    (1) domestic    and municipal uses, including water for
    sustaining human life and the life of domestic animals;
    (2) industrial uses, meaning processes designed to convert
    materiak of a lower order of value into forms having
    greater usability and commercial valtm, including the
    development    of power’ by means other than hydro-
    electric;
    (3) irrigation;
    (4) mining and recovery of minerals;
    (5) hydroelectric    power;
    (6) navigation;
    (7) recreation    and pleasure; and
    (8) other beneficial   usea.
    The reservoir in this case is being constructed primarily to control and store
    water on the Guadalt@ River as a surface water supply for the city of Kerrville, in
    compliance with the constitutional purposes of the district and the statutory priorities
    of water usage. One secondary use of the reservoir as enumerated by the legislature is
    recreation and pleasure.
    p. 997
    .   .
    Mr. E. C. Parker, Jr. - Page Four      (l&q-313)
    The legislature has given conservation and reclamation districts the necessary
    powers to regulate the use of reservoirs for recreational purposes. The Texas Water
    Safety Act provides In section 3l.O92(c) of the Parks and Wildlife Code:
    The governing board of a political subdivision of the state
    created pursuant to Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas
    ch-qter.   (Emphasis added).
    We are advised that constructing the proposed facilities     will aid proper control and
    regulation of the recreational use of the reservoir.
    The Harris County W.C.I.D. #llO opinion prohibited construction of a complex of
    recreational   buildings and facilities   which were uwelated to the constitutional
    purposes of the district. It is our understanding that the facilities you propose to build
    are related to a relatively minor portion of the total reservoir project and serve to
    promote the full use and enjoyment of the reservoir by the public. We feel that the
    improvements     you propose are ordinary and necessary to the proper control,
    management, and regulation of public reservoirs and lakes, and are in furtherance of
    the constitutional    purposes of “the canservation and development of all natural
    resources of this State, Including the control, storing, preservation and distribution
    of. . . the waters of its rivers and streams; for irrigation, power and all other useful
    pUWOSS.”      Tex. Const art. XVI, 559(a).       (Emphasis added).      Conservation and
    development of natural resources includes use and enjoyment          “Conserve” means to
    keep in a safe or sound state, to save, to preserve from change or destruction, and is
    svnonvmous with maintain. sustain. uohold. &fend. orotect. euard. shield and secure.
    PecosValley Artesian Cc&ervanc~ D’istric’t v. Peters, 173 P.>d 490 (N.M. 1945). The
    reservoir cannot be used and enjoyed without facilities designed not only to accomplish
    and regulate such use, but ako to conserve and protect the reservoir.
    SUMMARY
    Construction of recreational facilities to make certain areas
    of a reservoir suitable for public access and use, to include
    landscaping,     making certain areas suitable for swimming,
    providing parking areas, restrooms, boat ramps, picnic tables,
    lighting, roads, and fencing is a constitutionally     permissible
    activity of a conservation and reclamation district created
    under article XVI, section 59 of the Texas Constitution.
    p. 998
    Mr. E. C. Parker, Jr. - Page Five   (MV-313)
    m
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICHARD E.GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Ladd Pattillo
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMl’lTEE
    -Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilpin
    Ladd Pattillo
    Bruce Youngblood
    p. 999
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-313

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1981

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017