-
The Attorney General of Texas March 23, 1981 MARKWHITE AltorneyGeneral Mr. Homer A. Foerster Opinion No. MW-310 Executive Director State Purchasiw & General Re: Construction of section 3.08(a) Services Commission of article 60&i, V.T.C.S. L&J. State Offhe Building Austin, Texas 787 11 Dear Mr. Poerster: You have requested our opinion regarding this question: Is the commission authorized by section 3.08(a) of article SOlb, V.T.C.S., to waive alI oompetitive bidding requirements, whether formal or informal, on delegated purchases mder $1000 Artiele 6Olb, V.T.C.S., the State Purchasing and General Services Act, provides in pertinent part as follows: See. 3.08. (a) The commission shall establish a pmeedure by which state egencies shall be delagated the authority to purchase supplies, materials, and equipment if the purchase is less than $600 and shall provide in the procedure that formal competitive bidding is not required for purchases under $100. . . . . (d) A3encies making purchases under this section must attempt to obtain at least three competitive bids from sa~rces which normally offer for sale the merehandke being purchased. . ... sec. 3.10. . . . All purchases of and contracts for supplies, materiab, services, and equipment shall, except as provided herein, be based whenever possible on competitive bids. n. QA7 Mr. Homer A. Poerster - Psge Two (H-310) You state that the commission delegates authority to make such purchases to agencies under its Rule 028.12.OLO59b), but that it asks agencies to take a minimum of three informal competitive bicb where possible. Tbs rule does not distbguish between bids tmder $500 and those under $100, but requires an attempt at competitive bidding in each instance. You flrther state that the term “formaLcompetitive biddingw has a rather precise meaning in purchase cicltw and that it comprehends “a bid which has been submitted in a sealed envelope to prevent dissemination of its contents before the specified time and date set for bid opening.” For the following ressons, we snswer your question in the negative. First, section 3.08(a) exprcrssly provib that “formaP competitive bidding is not required for purchases under $100, not that %ompetitive bidding” is not required. We must assume that the legislature used the adjective “formal” for a purpose, Eddins-Walcher Butane Company v. Calvert,
298 S.W.2d 93(Tex. 1957k L & M-Surco Manufacturing, In %Ynn Title Company,
580 S.W.2d 920(Tax. Civ. App. - Tyler l979, writ dism’d),‘`` that it did not regard “formal competitive bidding” and “competitive bidding” as synonymous We firther assume that the legislature intended that the term “formal competitive bidding,” which is not defined in the statute, would be given its commonly accepted meaning. See Sanford v. State,
492 S.W.2d 581(Tex. Crim. App. 1973); In’re Estate of. Purr, 553%W. 26 676 (Tex. Civ. App. - Amarillo 1977, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v. Haunsehild,
527 S.W. 26270 (Tex. Civ. App. - Amarillo 1976, writ refkl eJ Second, section’S.O8(d), which provides that agencies making purchases mdeF&?tion 3.08 must attempt to obtain at least three competitive biQ from the designated sources, does not except purohese~ of less than $100. It applies to all purchases of less than $500, and its conditions must be satisfied. We therefore conclude that the commission is not authorieed by section 3.08(a) of article 6Olb, V.T.C.S., to waive all compstitiw! bidding requirements, whether formal or informal, on delegated purchases tmder $100. However, in view of the fact that section 3.10 only requires competitive bids “whenever possible,” we think the commission may promulgate rules indicating those instances in which it will consider that competitim bids are not posslhle. SUMMARY The State Ptxehesing snd General Servfces Commission is not authorized by section 3.08(a) of article SOlb, V.T.C.S., to waive all competitive bidding requirements, whether formal or informal, on deleted purchases under $100. veneNl* Attorney General of Texas p. 988 Mr. Homer A. Poerster - Page Tluee @f-310) JOHN W. PAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney Qeneral, RICHARD E.GBAYUl Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared by Jon Bible Assistant Attorney General APPROVRD: OPINION COMMrI’TEE Susan L. Garrison, Chairman Jon Bible Rick Gilptn Eva Loutzenhiser Bruce Youngblood p. 989
Document Info
Docket Number: MW-310
Judges: Mark White
Filed Date: 7/2/1981
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017