Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1981 )


Menu:
  •                       The Attorney               General         of Texas
    March 23, 1981
    MARKWHITE
    AltorneyGeneral
    Mr. Homer A. Foerster                      Opinion No. MW-310
    Executive Director
    State Purchasiw & General                  Re: Construction of section 3.08(a)
    Services Commission                      of article 60&i, V.T.C.S.
    L&J. State Offhe Building
    Austin, Texas 787 11
    Dear Mr. Poerster:
    You have requested our opinion regarding this question:
    Is the commission authorized by section 3.08(a) of
    article SOlb, V.T.C.S., to waive alI oompetitive
    bidding requirements, whether formal or informal, on
    delegated purchases mder $1000
    Artiele 6Olb, V.T.C.S., the State Purchasing and General Services Act,
    provides in pertinent part as follows:
    See. 3.08.    (a) The commission shall establish a
    pmeedure by which state egencies shall be delagated
    the authority to purchase supplies, materials, and
    equipment if the purchase is less than $600 and shall
    provide in the procedure that formal competitive
    bidding is not required for purchases under $100.
    . . . .
    (d) A3encies making purchases under this section
    must attempt to obtain at least three competitive
    bids from sa~rces which normally offer for sale the
    merehandke being purchased.
    . ...
    sec. 3.10.  . . . All purchases of and contracts
    for supplies, materiab, services, and equipment shall,
    except as provided herein, be based whenever possible
    on competitive bids.
    n.   QA7
    Mr. Homer A. Poerster - Psge Two         (H-310)
    You state that the commission delegates authority to make such purchases to
    agencies under its Rule 028.12.OLO59b), but that it asks agencies to take a minimum of
    three informal competitive bicb where possible. Tbs rule does not distbguish between
    bids tmder $500 and those under $100, but requires an attempt at competitive bidding in
    each instance. You flrther state that the term “formaLcompetitive        biddingw has a
    rather precise meaning in purchase     cicltw and that it comprehends “a bid which has
    been submitted in a sealed envelope to prevent dissemination of its contents before the
    specified time and date set for bid opening.”
    For the following ressons, we snswer your question in the negative.            First,
    section 3.08(a) exprcrssly provib   that “formaP competitive bidding is not required for
    purchases under $100, not that %ompetitive bidding” is not required. We must assume
    that the legislature used the adjective “formal” for a purpose, Eddins-Walcher Butane
    Company v. Calvert, 
    298 S.W.2d 93
    (Tex. 1957k L & M-Surco Manufacturing, In
    %Ynn Title Company, 
    580 S.W.2d 920
    (Tax. Civ. App. - Tyler l979, writ dism’d),‘``
    that it did not regard “formal competitive bidding” and “competitive bidding” as
    synonymous       We firther assume that the legislature intended that the term “formal
    competitive bidding,” which is not defined in the statute, would be given its commonly
    accepted meaning. See Sanford v. State, 
    492 S.W.2d 581
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1973); In’re
    Estate of. Purr, 553%W.       26 676 (Tex. Civ. App. - Amarillo 1977, writ ref’d n.r.e.);
    Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v. Haunsehild, 
    527 S.W. 26
    270 (Tex. Civ.
    App. - Amarillo 1976, writ refkl       eJ Second, section’S.O8(d), which provides that
    agencies making purchases mdeF&?tion          3.08 must attempt to obtain at least three
    competitive biQ from the designated sources, does not except purohese~ of less than
    $100. It applies to all purchases of less than $500, and its conditions must be satisfied.
    We therefore conclude that the commission is not authorieed by section 3.08(a)
    of article 6Olb, V.T.C.S., to waive all compstitiw! bidding requirements, whether
    formal or informal, on delegated purchases tmder $100. However, in view of the fact
    that section 3.10 only requires competitive bids “whenever possible,” we think the
    commission may promulgate rules indicating those instances in which it will consider
    that competitim bids are not posslhle.
    SUMMARY
    The State Ptxehesing snd General Servfces Commission is
    not authorized by section 3.08(a) of article SOlb, V.T.C.S., to
    waive all competitive bidding requirements, whether formal or
    informal, on deleted  purchases under $100.
    veneNl*
    Attorney General of Texas
    p. 988
    Mr. Homer A. Poerster - Page Tluee     @f-310)
    JOHN W. PAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney Qeneral,
    RICHARD E.GBAYUl
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Jon Bible
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVRD:
    OPINION COMMrI’TEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilptn
    Eva Loutzenhiser
    Bruce Youngblood
    p. 989
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-310

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1981

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017