Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1981 )


Menu:
  •                        The Attorney                General of Texas
    March        11,1981
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Oscar II. Mauxy, Chairman            Opinion No.   MW-302
    Senate Education Committee
    Texas Senate, State Capitol                    Re:   Issue of new tuition revenue
    Austin, Texas 78711                            bonds   under chapter 55 of the
    Education Code
    Dear Senator Mauxy:
    You have asked whether universities        authorized to issue tuition
    revenue bonds up to certain maximum amounts under the provisions of
    sections 55.17, 55.171 and 55.172 of the Education Code can issue new bonds
    as they retire the original debt, so long as the statutory maximum amount is
    not exceeded.
    Section 55.17(e)(2) authorizes the board of regents of Texas Tech
    University to issue tuition revenue bonds in an amount “not to exceed $35
    million” for the purpose of providing facilities for the School of Medicine at
    Lubbock. The University of Texas System, the Texas A & M System, the
    University of Houston and Pan Ameri n University may issue bonds in
    amounts limited in similar language.             Educ. Code SSSS.l?(f), 55.171,
    55.172.
    The discretion inherent in the phrase “not to exceed” is a recognition
    that a lesser amount may suffice but in no event can a greater amount than
    the stated amount be used. Train v. City of New York, 
    420 U.S. 35
    (1975);
    Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co. v. Thomas, 
    187 S.W.2d 689
    (Tex. Civ. ADD.- 1945. no writ). As we understand vour ouerv. the
    unive.rsities wish io continue to issue new debt up to the r&pe&ve &llng
    amounts as old debt is retired.
    A perusal of certain constitutional provisions containing authorization
    for bonded Indebtedness in identical language is instructive.       Article III,
    section 49-b of the Texas Constitution authorizes bonds to purchase land for
    resale to Texas veterans.       When an increase ln the dollar amount was
    needed, the provision was amended to provide for higher dollar amounts.
    The Veterans’ Land Board did not issue new bonds as old bonds were retired.
    ‘Similarly, article III, section 49-d-l increased the dollar amount authorized
    for the Texas Water Development Board by article III, section 49-c. Article
    III, section Sob-1 increased the dollar amount authorized for bond-financed
    student loans by article III, section 50b. In each case, the authorizing
    P-    964
    Honorable Oscar H. Mauxy - Page Two          (MW-302)
    language is identical to that contained in sections 55.17, 55.171 and 55.172 of the
    Education Code.      In each case, a constitutional amendment was required when
    additional funds were needed.
    Legislative history also supports our view that the universities may not issue new
    debt up to the ceiling amounts as old debt is retired. The original version of section
    55.17 had no dollar ceilingsl the final version did.~ While records of floor debate were
    not kept for the 62nd Legislature, which passed section 55.17, there are records of
    floor debate for the 63rd Legislature, which passed sections 55.171 and 55.172. These
    records indicate that the amounts authorized were an aggregate amount and that
    additional amounts would call for new legislation.
    It is our opinion that additional legislation is required before the universities may
    issue further tuition, revenue bonds once the schools have reached their present
    statutory limits, and that there is no authority for issuing new bonds as outstanding
    debt is retired under the existing provisions.
    SUMMARY
    Universities authorized to issue tuition revenue bonds under
    sections 55.17, 55.171 and 55.172 may not issue additional bonds
    as outstanding bonds are retired.
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICHARD E. GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Susan’Lee Voss
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilpln
    Robert T. Lewis
    Ladd Pattillo
    Susan Lee Voss
    Bruce Youngblood
    P-   965
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-302

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1981

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017