-
The Attorney General of Texas March 11,1981 MARK WHITE Attorney General Honorable Oscar II. Mauxy, Chairman Opinion No. MW-302 Senate Education Committee Texas Senate, State Capitol Re: Issue of new tuition revenue Austin, Texas 78711 bonds under chapter 55 of the Education Code Dear Senator Mauxy: You have asked whether universities authorized to issue tuition revenue bonds up to certain maximum amounts under the provisions of sections 55.17, 55.171 and 55.172 of the Education Code can issue new bonds as they retire the original debt, so long as the statutory maximum amount is not exceeded. Section 55.17(e)(2) authorizes the board of regents of Texas Tech University to issue tuition revenue bonds in an amount “not to exceed $35 million” for the purpose of providing facilities for the School of Medicine at Lubbock. The University of Texas System, the Texas A & M System, the University of Houston and Pan Ameri n University may issue bonds in amounts limited in similar language. Educ. Code SSSS.l?(f), 55.171, 55.172. The discretion inherent in the phrase “not to exceed” is a recognition that a lesser amount may suffice but in no event can a greater amount than the stated amount be used. Train v. City of New York,
420 U.S. 35(1975); Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co. v. Thomas,
187 S.W.2d 689(Tex. Civ. ADD.- 1945. no writ). As we understand vour ouerv. the unive.rsities wish io continue to issue new debt up to the r&pe&ve &llng amounts as old debt is retired. A perusal of certain constitutional provisions containing authorization for bonded Indebtedness in identical language is instructive. Article III, section 49-b of the Texas Constitution authorizes bonds to purchase land for resale to Texas veterans. When an increase ln the dollar amount was needed, the provision was amended to provide for higher dollar amounts. The Veterans’ Land Board did not issue new bonds as old bonds were retired. ‘Similarly, article III, section 49-d-l increased the dollar amount authorized for the Texas Water Development Board by article III, section 49-c. Article III, section Sob-1 increased the dollar amount authorized for bond-financed student loans by article III, section 50b. In each case, the authorizing P- 964 Honorable Oscar H. Mauxy - Page Two (MW-302) language is identical to that contained in sections 55.17, 55.171 and 55.172 of the Education Code. In each case, a constitutional amendment was required when additional funds were needed. Legislative history also supports our view that the universities may not issue new debt up to the ceiling amounts as old debt is retired. The original version of section 55.17 had no dollar ceilingsl the final version did.~ While records of floor debate were not kept for the 62nd Legislature, which passed section 55.17, there are records of floor debate for the 63rd Legislature, which passed sections 55.171 and 55.172. These records indicate that the amounts authorized were an aggregate amount and that additional amounts would call for new legislation. It is our opinion that additional legislation is required before the universities may issue further tuition, revenue bonds once the schools have reached their present statutory limits, and that there is no authority for issuing new bonds as outstanding debt is retired under the existing provisions. SUMMARY Universities authorized to issue tuition revenue bonds under sections 55.17, 55.171 and 55.172 may not issue additional bonds as outstanding bonds are retired. JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General RICHARD E. GRAY III Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared by Susan’Lee Voss Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Susan L. Garrison, Chairman Jon Bible Rick Gilpln Robert T. Lewis Ladd Pattillo Susan Lee Voss Bruce Youngblood P- 965
Document Info
Docket Number: MW-302
Judges: Mark White
Filed Date: 7/2/1981
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017