Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1981 )


Menu:
  •                        The Attorney General of Texas
    Narch 5, 1981
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Bob Bullock                    Opinion No. M+295
    Comptroller of Public Accounts
    Capitol Station                          Re: Whether various statutes apply
    Austin, Texas 76774                      to the Texas Guaranteed Student
    Loan Corporation
    Dear Mr. Bullock:
    You ask whether the Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation is a
    “state agency” within a number of statutes.  The Texas Guaranteed’Student
    Loan Corporation is a public, non-profit corporation created pursuant to
    chapter 57 of the Education Code. It guarantees loans made to eligible
    students under the federal guaranteed student loan program established by
    the Higher Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. sections 1001 et seq. It is
    specifically made subject to the Texas Sunset Act, Education Code section
    57.12(a).
    The term public corporation includes public agencies such as drainage
    districts, irrigation districts, cities and city housing authorities.    Harris
    County Drain-&e District No. 12 v. City of-Houston; 
    35 S.W.2d 118x
                       Comm’n App. l93U; Loumparo    ff   v. Hous’                                  
    261 S.W.2d 224
    , 227 (Tex. Civ. App. - Dallas 1953, no writ); J. C. Engleman Land
    Co. v. Donna Irrigation District No. 1, 
    209 S.W. 426
    (Tex. Civ. App. - San
    Antonio 1919. writ ref’dl. It also can refer to an instrumentality       of the
    government or a convenient mesns to carry out a governmental function.
    Attorney General Opinion No. 2971 (1935). It is %onnected             with the
    administration of the government, and the interests and franchises of which
    are the exclusive property and domain of the government itself.“’ Miller v.
    m,        150 SW. 2d 973, 976 (Tex. 1940. As such, the term public corporation
    has been found to include the Texas Emolovers Insurance Association and the
    Bank Deposit Insurance Corporation.     M&k%eton v. Texas Power & Light Co.,
    
    185 S.W. 556
    (Tex. 1916); Attorney General Opinion No. 297l(l935).
    You ask whether the Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation is a
    “state agency” for purposes of articles 6252-94 6252-Q 6252-Ilb, 6252-llc,
    6252-13a, 6252-17, 6252-17a, 6252-19, 601b and 4413(32), V.T.C.S. The Texas
    Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation was created after a study by an
    interim committee of the legislature.    One of the reasons that the public
    corporation form was chosen was to provide a measure of administrative
    flexibility not available to state agencies.  Report of the Special Interim
    Study Committee on State Involvement~ln and Administration of Student
    p.   942
    Honorable Bob Bullock - Psge Two
    Loan Programs for Texas; Coordinating Board, Texas College and University System,
    Final Report on Project to Evaluate Alternatives        for a Student Loan Guarantee
    Program (November 17, 1976). In light of the reason expressed in the legislative history
    for choosing the non-profit corporate vehicle, we do not believe the legislature
    intended to include the corporation within the statutes which apply to state agencies
    generally.   The same legislature which created the Texas Guaranteed Student Loan
    Corporation knew how to indicate that a public corporation was to be considered as a
    state agency. See State Bar Act, V.T.C.S. art. 32Oa-1, S2 (State Bar %ontinued as a
    public corpora=       and an administrative      sgency of the judicial department     of
    government.“).   Since it did not do so in the case of the Texas Guaranteed Student
    Loan Corporation and since its apparent intent was to utilize the,~corporate form to
    permit administrative     flexibility not available to state agencies, we believe the
    legislature did not intend that the corporation be construed as being a state agency.
    Accordingly, it is our opinion that the corporation is not covered by articles 6252-94
    6252-Q 6252-lib, 6252-llc, 6252-13a, 6252-17, 6252-19, 601b and 4413(32). We note that
    our conclusion that the corporation is not subject to article 6252-19, the Tort Claims
    Act, is premised on the determination          that the legislature did not intend the
    corporation to fall within the doctrine of governmental immunity.
    We believe, however, that the corporation is subject to the provisions of the
    Open Records Act, article 6252-li’a, V.T.C.S. Section 2(F) of that statute specifically
    extends coverage to “every . . . corporation. . . which is supported in whole or in part
    by public funds.” Since the corporation received a start up appropriation, we believe it
    falb within the precise language of the Open Records Act.
    You finally note that section 57.75 of the Education Code provides as follows:
    All income, property, and other assets of the corporation are
    exempt from taxation by the state and political subdivisions of
    the state.
    You ask whether this language exempts the corporation from payment             of the taxes
    imposed on its purchases by the Limited Sales, Excise and Use Tax Act,        articles 20.01
    through 20.17, Taxation - General. In our opinion, we need not answer        this question,
    because the corporation is in all probability eligible for one or both of    the following
    exemptions found in the Limited Sales, Excise and Use Tax Act itself:
    (H) United States; State; Political      Subdivision; Religious,
    Eleemosynary Organizations.     There     are exempted from the
    computation   of the amount of the         taxes imposed by this
    Chapter, the receipts from the sale,        lease or rental of any
    taxable items to, or the storage, use     or other consumption of
    taxable items by:
    . . . .
    (5) Any organization  created for religious, educational,
    charitable or eleemosynary purposes, provided that no part of
    p. 943
    Honorable Bob Bullock - Page Three
    the net earnings of any such organization   inures to the benefit
    of any private shareholder or individual
    . . . .
    (7) An organization qualifying for exemption from federal
    income tax under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(&3)
    provided, however, that no item purchased shall be used for the
    personal benefit of any private stockholder or individual and the
    items purchased must be related to the purpose of said
    organization or corporation. Tax. - Gem art. 20.04.
    SUMMARY
    The Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation was not
    intended by the legislature to be a state agency. It is, however,
    subject to the Texas Open Records Act and the Sunset Act. It
    is exempted from payment of the taxes imposed by the Limited
    Sales, Excise and Use Tax Act, articles 20.01- .17, Taxation-
    General
    xm
    MARK      WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICHARD E. GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by C. Robert Heath
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilpin
    C. Robert Heath
    Eva Lcutzenhiser
    p. 944
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-295

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1981

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017