Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1980 )


Menu:
  •                        The Attorney             General of Texas
    MARK WHITE                               November 21, 1980
    Attorney General
    Honorable Joe Resweber                   Opinion No. NW-274
    Harris County Attorney
    1001 Preston, Suite 634                  Re: Whether Harris County can
    Houston, Texas 77002                     maintain a fishing pier extending
    into another county
    Dear Mr. Resweber:
    You have asked whether Harris County can expend funds to repair and
    maintain a fishing pier extending out from Harris County’s Sylvan Beach
    Park over the public waters of Galveston Bay, which are in Chambers
    County. You have informed us that Harris County owns the pier. You have
    also advised us that the necessary federal permits for maintenance of a pier
    over public waters have been issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
    and that no sgreement      exists between Harris and Chambers Counties
    regarding the park. Inquiry is therefore limited to the authority of Harris
    County in the matter.
    Article V, section 18 of the Texas Constitution     states that    the
    commissioners courts shall exercise “such powers and jurisdiction over    all
    county business, as is conferred by this Constitution and the laws of    the
    State, or as may be hereafter prescribed.” As the supreme court stated     in
    Canales v. Laughlin, 
    214 S.W.2d 451
    (Tex. 1948):
    The Constitution     does not confer on the commis-
    sioners courts ‘general authority over the county
    business’ and such courts can exercise only such
    powers as the Constitution itself or the statutes have
    ‘specifically conferred upon them.’ See Mills County
    v. Lampasas County, 
    90 Tex. 603
    , 606, 
    40 S.W. 403
    ,
    404; Anderson v. Wood, 
    137 Tex. 201
    , 203, 
    152 S.W.2d 1084
    , 1085. While the commissioners courts have a
    broad discretion      in exercising  powers expressly
    conferred on them, nevertheless the legal basis for
    any action by any such court must be ultimately
    found in the Constitution or the 
    statutes. 214 S.W.2d at 453
    .
    p. 872
    Honorable Joe Resweber    - Page Two
    The applicable statute in this instance is article 6079e, V.T.C.S., which outlines
    the powers available to the county in “acquiring, improving, equipping, maintaining,
    financ@, and operating” public parks owned by the county. V.T.C.S. art. 6079e, S2.
    These powers may be exercised by a specially created Board of Park Commissioners, or
    by the county commissioners themselves.       In Harris County, the commissioners court
    has elected to act as the Board of Park Commissioners. The authority for maintenance
    and operation of county parks is set forth in section 9 of article 6079e, which provides
    as follows:
    Subject to the supervision of the Commissioners Court, the
    Board shall maintain and operate any park or parks administered
    by said Board, and subject to the approval of said Court, the
    Board shall have full and complete authority to enter into any
    contract, lease, or other agreement connected with or incident
    to or in any manner affecting          the acquisition,   financing,
    construction,    equipment, maintenance,      or operation of any
    facility or facilities located or to be located on or pertaining to
    any park or parks administered by the Board; and any such
    contract, lease, or other agreement may be for such length or
    period of time and won such terms and conditions as may be
    prescribed therein.      The Board shall also have authority to
    disburse and pay out moneys and funds under its control for any
    lawful purpose for the benefit of such park or parks.
    Article 6079e, V.T.C.S., does not expressly confine the authority of Harris
    County to maintenance of park property within the county itself.        See Attorney
    General Opinion H-1170 (1978) (Potter and Randall Counties may Ktribute             to
    operation of park located in Potter County). Although article 6081e, V.T.C.S., limits
    the county’s territorial    jurisdiction   to acquisition of park sites within county
    boundaries, no land acquisition is involved here. See Attorney General Opinion H-392
    (1974) (authority of county to purchase land outside its territorial limits); see also
    Attorney General Opinion H-462 (1974); Letter Advisory No. 133 (1977)(county
    ownership of land outside its boundaries).
    At Sylvan Beach Park, the shoreline is the boundary between Harris County and
    Chambers County. The pier begins at Harris County and extends for approximately
    220 feet over Chambers County. The language in article 6079e appears to be a grant
    of broad authority for the county commissioners to enter into any contract or
    agreement which would be of benefit to the park, including maintenance of a fishing
    pier which extends into another county. The county of course must maintain sufficient
    control over the pier to ensure that the public purpose for this expenditure is carried
    out. See Tex. Const. art. III, S52; Attorney General Opinion H-413 (1974).
    p. 873
    Honorable Joe Resweber    - Page Three
    SUMMARY
    Harris County may maintain a park fishing pier which
    extends from a Harris County Park into public waters located in
    another county.
    f-7
    MARK      WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    RICHARD E. GRAY III
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Amie Rodnick
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMlTTEE
    Susan L. Garrison, Acting Chairman
    Jon Bible
    Rick Gilpin
    Amie Rodnick
    p. 874
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-274

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1980

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017