Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1979 )


Menu:
  •                       The Attorney                  General of Texas
    December       18,   1979
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Charles Murphy, Director            Opinion No. MW-10 4
    Texas Aeronautics Commission
    P. 0. Box 12607, Capitol Station              Re: Authority of the legislature
    410 East 5th Street                           to direct the charging of fees
    Austin, Texas 78711                           through riders to the General
    Appropriations Act.
    Dear Mr. Murphy:
    You have requested our opinion whether the legislature, through a
    rider to the General Appropriations Act, may validly direct the Texas
    Aeronautics Commission to chame a reasonable fee for the publication
    entitled Texas Airport Directory. -
    The commission’s authority to publish the Directory and other such
    publications is found in the general law in article 46c6, subdivision 8,
    V.T.C.S, which reeds in pertinent part:
    The Commission may isme such aeronautical p&lie&
    tions as may be required in the public interest
    This statute includes no specific grant of authority for thi commission
    to set or charge fees for such publications, and statutes are “strictly
    construed against fixing a fee by implication, as regards both the fixing of
    the fee end the officer entitled thereto.”      Moore v. Sheppard, 
    192 S.W.2d 559
    , 561 (Tex 1946). Therefore, the commission has no authority under
    article 46c-6, subdivision 8 to set or collect a fee for the Directory.
    However, article 4413(33), V.T.C.S., relates to the charge for sale of
    publications of executive departments and state agencies, and provides in
    section 1 that:
    Any.depertment  or agency in the executive branch
    of    the   state   government may, unless otherwise
    specifically directed by statute, set and collect a
    sales charge for DUbliCatiOnS end other Drinted matter
    when SUCKcharges are deemed to be in the public
    interest
    P-   324
    Honorable Charles Murphy      -   Page Two      (MW-104)
    (Emphasis added.
    Thus, article 44l3(33) clearly permits the Texas Aeronautics Commission, at its
    discretion end when it deems it in the public interest to do so, to set end charge a fee for
    any or all of the publications authorized by article 46~6, subdivision 8.
    But, by rider to the General Appropriations Act of 1979, the legislature attempts to
    direct the commission to set a fee for the Diectory.     The specific language is found in
    article III, at III-8 of the act, end states:
    The Commission is hereby directed to set a reasonable fee for the
    publication entitled Texas Airport Directory. Fun& received from
    sale of the publication shall be deposited to the General Revenue
    Fund
    It is settled law in Texas that a rider attached to a general    appropriation bill cannot
    repeal, modify or amend an existing general law. See Attorney          General Opinions V-1254,
    V-1253 (1951), and cases cited       The legislature cannot make        mandatory by a general
    appropriation rider that which the general law makes permissive        or discretionary. &
    In Attorney   General   Opinion MW-51 (19791, the above Opinion V-1254 was relied
    upon, and stated:
    . . . a general appropriation bill may contain any provisions or
    riders which detail, limit, or restrict the use of funds or otherwise
    insure that the money is spent for the required activity for which it
    is therein appropriated, if the provisions or riders are necessarily
    connected with end incidental to the appropriation and use of the
    fun&, and provided they do not conflict with general legislation.
    As ln the case of MW-51, which dealt in this instance with a General Appropriations
    Act rider directing the State Board of Control to set certain minimum and maximum
    pad&g rates, the rider directing the Commission to set e reasonable fee for the Directory
    “neither appropriates nor details, limits or restricts the use of funds.” It is instead a
    general directive to the Texas Aeronautics Commission to take certain affirmative action,
    and it may not validly be included in the General Appropriations Act.
    Furthermore, the language of the rider directing that funds “received from sale of
    the publication shall be deposited to the General Revenue Fund’ conflicts with the general
    law stated in section 3 of article 4413(33), which provides that:
    Money collected from the chalges authorized by this Act shall be
    deposited in the fund from which the costs of printing the
    respective publications or materiels were onginelly pald, end such
    moneys shall be subject to epproprlatlon by the Legislature.
    (Emphasis added.
    P.   325
    Honorable Charles Murphy     -     Page Three         (NW-104)
    SUMMARY
    The Texas Aeronautics Commission has the authority to set and
    charge a fee for its publications issued in the public interest. A
    General Appropriations Act rider directing the Texas Aeronautics
    Commission to set a reasonable fee for the publication entitled
    Texas Airport Directory is invalid since it is an attempt to enact
    general legislation in the appropriations act.
    MARK     WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    TED L. HARTLEY
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Bob Gemmage
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    C. Robert Heath, Chairmen
    David B. Brooks
    Walter Davis
    Bob Gemmage
    Susan Garrison
    Rick Gilpin
    William G Reid
    Bruce Youngblood
    P.     326
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-104

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1979

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017