Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1979 )


Menu:
  •                            The Attorney               General of Texas
    March        16,    1979
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    supems cmln suildinp   Honorable Jerome Chapman                      Opinion No. NW-5
    P.O.ear ,m             Texas Department of Human
    Au&n. TX.78711
    512,47S-25ol             Resources                                   Re: Whether the Department of
    John H. Reagan Building                       Human Resources and a county
    Austin, Texas 78701                           which jointly operate  an infant
    101cumwce.Suite200                                                   adoption program may charge fees.
    m(P. TX.79202
    tWl42.9944
    Dear Mr. Chapman:
    You have requested our opinion regarding the collection of adoption
    fees which are assessed in the infant adoption program. operated jointly by
    the Texas Department      of -Human Resources land the Bell County Welfare
    Board. Child Welfare Boards are appointed by the county commissioners
    courts for’ the purpose of. improving the health, education and welfare of
    children in the state. V.T.C.S. art 6954 S 4. The local boards are entities
    of the Department      of Human Resou~rces “for the purposes of providing
    coordinated state and local public welfare services for $hildren and their
    families and coordinated utilization of federal, state, and local funds for
    these servicesw    
    Id. S 4(c).
    The Department of Human Resources has the
    duty to “[aldmhtfir      or supervise all child welfare service, except as
    otherwise provided for by law.” V.T.C.S. art. 695c, S 4f2). Adopting parents
    have been charged a fee amounting to 7% of their ,ineome. The proceeds of
    the fees are used generally to underwrite the expenses of the adoption
    program.
    There is no statutory authority for either the Department of Human
    Resources or Bell County to collect payments from adopting parents,
    whether such payments are characterized      as a fee or reimbursement      of
    government oosts. In the absence of specific statutory authorization,     the
    state or county may not amess fees. Nueces County’v. Currington, 
    162 S.W.2d 667
    (Ten. 1942); McCaUa v. City of Rockdale, 
    246 S.W. 654
    (Tex.
    1922); Attorney General Opinions Ii-1302 (1978); H-1052, H-990 (1977); H-702,
    H-647 (1975); H-443 (1974); WW-l482 (1962): V-l236 (1951); V-744 (1948);
    V.T.C.S. art. 5139ez, 5 9 (adoption investigation   fee permitted in Orange
    County).
    p.     14
    Honorable Jerome Chapman      -      Page Two     (MN-5)
    SUMMARY
    Neither BeII County         nor the Texas Department       of    Human
    Resources has authority    to assess adoption fees.
    MARK     WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    TED L. HARTLEY
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by David B. Brooks
    Asdistant Attorney’General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    C. Rob& Heath, Chairman
    David B. Brooks
    Rick GiIpin
    William G Reid
    DavidYoung     .
    Bruce Youngblood
    p-    15
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-5

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1979

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017