Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1978 )


Menu:
  •                       The Attorney                 General of Texas
    June   2, 1978
    JOHN   L. HILL
    Attorney General
    Honorable L. Alvis Vandygriff                         Opinion No. H- 1171
    Texas Savings & Loan Department
    P. 0. Box 1089                                        Re: Whether     the management
    Austin, Texas 78767                                   of     the  Savings   &     Loan
    Association may vote proxies of
    savings members and borrowing
    members in favor of a proposed
    merger.
    Dear Mr. Vandygriff:
    You have requested our opinion regarding the voting of general proxies
    by the    management   of a savings and loan association   in favor of a proposed
    merger.      You state that the management     of a particular    savings and loan
    association,   composed of savers, borrowers and owners of permanent       reserve
    fund stock, has agreed to merge with another savings and loan association.
    You first ask whether savers and borrowers are entitled to vote on the merger
    question.
    Section 10.03 of the Savings & Loan Act, article           852a, V.T.C.S.,   requires
    that a merger
    be approved  by a majority           of    the   total   vote   the
    members are entitled to cast.
    (Emphasis   added).    “Member” is defined   in the statute      as any
    person holding a savings account in an association,     or
    owning one or more shares of its Permanent        Reserve
    Fund Stock, or borrowing      from or assuming or obli-
    gated upon a loan in which an association          has an
    interest,  or owning property    which secures a loan in
    which an association has an interest.   The voting rights
    of members shall be as provided in the bylaws of each
    respective   association.
    P.   4733
    Honorable   L. Alvis Vandygriff    -    Page 2     (H-1171)
    Section 1.03(10). In the absence of any bylaw provision to the contrary,               each
    “member” is entitled to cast one vote by virtue of his membership
    plus an additional vote for each share or fraction thereof of
    the Permanent      Reserve Fund Stock of the association,     if
    any, owned by such member, and an additional vote for each
    One Hundred       Dollars ($100) or fraction    thereof  of the
    withdrawal    value of savings accounts,   if any, held by such
    member.
    Section 3.06.     Thus, in the situation you pose, each saver       and borrower of the
    association  is a “member” entitled to one vote plus additional      votes as provided in
    section 3.06.
    You next ask whether the management        of a savings and loan association   may
    vote the existing proxies of a member on a merger question.       In the usual instance,
    an association    requires that all savers and borrowers     execute   a general proxy,
    which “continueIs     in force from year to year,” unless revoked, pursuant to section
    3.06. A general proxy, however,
    only authorizes  the holder to vote on the ordinary affairs of
    the corporation,  such as the election of directors, etc., and
    does not authorize such holder to vote on the extraordinary
    matter of consolidating   one company with another.
    Fidelity Building & Loan Ass’n v. Thompson, 
    25 S.W.2d 247
    , 251 (Tex. Civ. App. -
    Dallas 1930). This case was reversed       on other grounds: however,     this relevant
    portion  of the Civil Appeals opinion was specifically~ approved~ and adopted.
    Fidelity Building & Loan Ass’n v. Thompson, 
    45 S.W.2d 167
    (Tex. Comm’n App. 1932,
    jdgmt adopted).   See
    -    Fletcher, Corporations   9 2060 (1974 ed). We believe it is clear
    that the management     of a savings and loan association    may not vote a member’s
    general proxy to effect a merger with another association.        Any attempt   to do so
    would be void. Fidelity Building & Loan Ass’n, m,        at 251.
    Your final question is whether the Savings & Loan Commissioner          may require
    special proxies to vote on a proposed merger.        The Commissioner     is empowered    to
    supervise  and regulate    savings and loan associations      under his jurisdiction    in a
    manner which is consistent        with the Savings & Loan Act.         Article 342-205(d),
    V.T.C.S.   The Commissioner      is also authorized  to see that such associations   follow
    the law as provided in section 8.13.           Since Fidelity Building & Loan Ass’n v.
    Thompson holds that general proxies may not be voted on a merger question, we
    believe it follows that the Commissioner        may require that the management      obtain
    from saver and borrower members special proxies authorizing           the management      to
    vote upon a proposed merger.
    p.   4734
    Honorable   L. Alvis Vandygriff   -    Page 3   (H-1171)
    SUMMARY
    In the absence of a bylaw provision to the contrary,       every
    saver and borrower of a savings and loan association         is a
    “member” entitled    to vote.     The management    of a savings
    and loan association   may not vote a member’s general proxy
    to effect a merger with another association.      The Savings &
    Loan Commissioner     is authorized   to require special proxies
    to vote on a proposed merger.
    APPROVED:
    C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman
    Opinion Committee
    jsn
    P.   4735
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-1171

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1978

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017