Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1978 )


Menu:
  •    The Attorney                  General of Texas
    January        17,   1978
    The Honorable Robert J. Winn                       Opinion No. H- 1115
    Executive Director of the Governor’s
    Coordinating Office for the Visually         Re:      Implementation of the
    Handicapped                                  statutory program for purchases
    P. 0. Box 13047, Capitol Station                   of blind-made products by the
    Austin, Texas 78711                                state.
    The Honorable Homer A. Foerster
    State Board of Control
    L.B. J. Building
    Austin, Texas 787ll
    Gentlemen:
    You have requested our opinion regarding the implementation          of the
    statutory program for purchases of blind-made products by the state.
    The 64th Legislature enacted two separate statutes which require state
    agencies to procure “all suitable products or services,” where available, from
    “nonprofit agencies for the blind.” House Bill 1673, a broad statute providing
    educational services to the blind, was enacted on May 31, 1975. Section 16 of
    the act, now codified as article 664-5, V.T.C.S., establishes a Texas
    Commission on Purchases of Blind-Made Products and Services, whose duty it
    is
    to determine the fair market price of all suitable
    products and services manufactured by the blind and
    offered for sale to the various agencies and depart-
    ments of the government of the State of Texas and of
    the political subdivisions of the state by any nonprofit
    agency for the blind organized under the laws of the
    State of Texas and recognized by the State Commis-
    sion for the Blind as capable of contributing to the
    purposes of this article, to revise such prices from
    time to time in accordance with changing market
    conditions, and to make such rules and regulations
    regarding specifications, time of delivery, authoriza-
    tion of a central nonprofit agency to facilitate     the
    P.     4561
    ,    .
    The Honorable Robert J. Winn
    The Honorable Homer A. Foerster       -    Page 2   (R-1115)
    distribution of orders among agencies for the blind, and
    other relevant matters of procedure as shall be necessary to
    carry out the purposes of this article. The needs of various
    state agencies shall be processed by requisition through the
    State Board of Control and in accordance with those rules
    and regulations to be established by the State Board of
    Control.
    Sec. 3. Article 664-5 requires that
    IalU suitable products or services hereinafter procured in
    accordance with applicable state specifications by or for any
    state department or agency, including agencies and depart-
    ments of political subdivisions, shall be procured from such
    nonprofit agencies for the blind in all cases where such
    products or services are available within the period specified
    at the price determined by the committee to be the fair
    market price for the products or services so procured, unless
    otherwise specifically provided by the Constitution of the
    State of Texas.
    Sec. 4.
    House Bill 2016, now codified as article 664-6, V.T.C.S., is similar in most
    respects to article 664-5. It creates a Texas Committee on Purchases of Blind-
    Made Products and Services and authorizes the Committee to determine the fair
    market price of all products and services manufactured by the blind for sale to
    state agencies. Section 4, however, imposes a caveat not present in article 664-5:
    All suitable products or services procured by or for a state
    department or agency shall be procured from nonprofit
    agencies for the blind if the products or services are
    available within the period specified and at the price
    determined by the committee to be the fair market price for
    the products or services unless otherwise specifically provid-
    ed by the Constitution of the State of Texas. However, in
    no event, shall the price paid be in excess of the cost 3
    comparable    products or servmes avarlable from other
    sources.
    Sec. 4 (Emphasis added). House Bill 2016 was enacted on the same date as, but
    prior to, House Bill 1673. Since the Senate amended House Bill 1673, it was not
    finally approved until the House concurred in the amendments.        See Ca les v.
    Cole, 
    102 S.W.2d 173
    (Tex. 1937). The vote to concur took placexter +i-&iaz
    Fge      of House Bill 2016. Texas Senate Journal, 64th Leg., 2068-70 (1975); Texas
    House Journal, 64th Leg., 4436, 4492 (1975).
    P.    4562
    ,,     .
    The Honorable Robert J. Winn
    The Honorable Homer A. Foerster      -   Page 3       (H-1115)
    It is well established that statutes relating to the same subject matter and
    having the same general purpose are to be construed with reference to one another.
    Whittenburg v. Craven, 
    258 S.W. 152
    , 153 (Tex. Comm’n App. 1924, jdgmt adopted).
    This rule of construction is particularly applicable to statutes enacted at the same
    session of the Legislature.    Wright v. Broeter, 
    196 S.W.2d 82
    , 85 (Tex. 1946). Such
    statutes must be harmonized. and effect given to each, unless there is an
    irreconcilable conflict between them. McGrady v. Terrell, 
    84 S.W. 641
    , 642 (Tex.
    1905).
    In our opinion, an irreconcilable conflict exists between the language of the
    two statutes.   Both require that the state purchase available products and services
    from nonprofit agencies for the blind at a price previously determined by the
    Committee.      Article 664-6, however, would permit the Board of Control, as
    purchasing agent for the state, to override this requirement whenever it determines
    that the price fixed by the Committee is “in excess of the cost of comparable
    products or services available from other sources. I’ We believe that this provision
    of article 664-6, not present in article 664-5, must be deemed largely to render
    nugatory the price-fixing duties of the Committee.
    In Ex parte de Jesus de la 0, 
    227 S.W.2d 212
    (Tex. Crim. 19501, the court held
    that
    [wl~here two acts passed at the same session of the
    legislature cannot be reconciled by any known rule of
    construction, the first ln time or position must give way to
    the last, and the latter act will stand as the final expression
    of the legislative will.
    
    Id. at 213.
    Since the two statutes are in irreconcilable conflict, and since article
    F64-6 was enacted prior to article 664-5, it is our opinion that the latter, being the
    latest expression of legislative intent, must prevail.
    SUMMARY
    Article 664-5, V.T.C.S., being a later expression of legisla-
    tive intent, prevails over conflicting provisions of article
    664-6, V.T.C.S.     As a result, the state is required to
    purchase available products and services from nonprofit
    agencies for the blind at the fair market price set by the
    Texas Committee on Purchases of Blind-Made Products and
    Services.
    P.   4563
    The Honorable Robert J. Winn
    The Honorable Homer A. Foerster   -   Page 4    (H-1115)
    orney General of Texas
    Opinion Committee
    jst
    p.   4564
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-1115

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1978

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017