-
The Honorable Dolph Briscoe Opinion No. H-841 Governor The State of Texas Re: Placement of a statue State Capitol in the Alamo chapel. Austin, Texas 78701 Dear Governor Briecoe: You have requested our opinion regarding the validity of the placement of a statue in the Alamo Chapel. You state that a private charitable fund has donated a substantial sum to the Daughters of the Republic of Texas for the purpose of constructing a statue depicting four heroes of the Battle of the Alamo. The proposed statue would be approximately eight feet in height and would be mounted on a five foot granite pedestal. In order to place the statue within the Alamo Church, it would be necessary to excavate the base to a depth of approximately four feet. Acts 1905, 29th Leg., ch. 7 at 7, 8, enacted into law in 1905, directed the Governor to deliver the Alamo Church property, including the Church itself, to the custody and care of the Daughters of the Republic of Texas, to be maintained by that organization as & memorial to the heroes of the Battle of the Alamo. Section 3 of the statute requires that the Alamo Church be maintained or remodeled upon plans adopted by the Daughters of the Republic of Texas, and approved by the Governor of Texas; provided that no than es or alter- in t e A amo Church ations shall b made ---li-+- -- p. 3546 The Honorable Dolph Briscoe - page 2 (H-841) It is clear that the statue may not be erected within the Alamo Chauel if its Placement therein would reauire anv "change or alteration" in the Church. In Mayer L-Texas - Tire & Rubber Co.,
223 S.W. 874(Tex. Civ. App. -- Ft. Worth m)T theurt held that the word 'alteration,' as applied to a building, means a substantial change
therein. 223 S.W. at 875. Emphasis added) We recently noted that most other jurisdictions agree that "alteration" means a modification or variation that does not destroy the identity of the thing affected. See Attorney General Opinion H-813 (1976), and authoritiesxted therein. "Alteration," defined as "substantial change," thus denotes a greater degree of modification or variation than does mere "change." In our opinion, the excavation to a depth of four feet would without question constitute a "change" in the Alamo Church. As a result, we believe that the placement of a .statue in the Alamo Church proper which would require such an excavation would violate the terms of the statute. SUMMARY Placement within the Alamo Chapel of a statue which would require excavation to a depth of four feet would violate the terms of Acts 1905, 29th Leg., ch. 7, at 7, 8. Very truly yours, Attorney General of Texas p. 3547 The Honorable Dolph Briscoe - page 3 (H-841) Opinion Committee ,jwb pa 3548
Document Info
Docket Number: H-841
Judges: John Hill
Filed Date: 7/2/1976
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017