Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1976 )


Menu:
  • The Honorable John C. White        Opinion No. H-764
    Commissioner of Agriculture
    Texas Department of Agriculture    Re: Whether persons who
    P. 0. Box 12847                    sell citrus fruit from
    Austin, Texas   78711              door to door must be
    licensed under the Citrus
    Bonding and Licensing
    Act.
    Dear Commissioner White:
    You have requested our opinion concerning an apparent
    conflict between sections 22 and 4(b) (5) of article 118b,
    V.T.C.S., The Citrus Fruit Growers Act. Section 22 of the
    Act provides in part:
    The provisions of this Act shall not
    apply to a retailer of citrus fruit. . . .
    Section 4(b)(5), enacted by the 64th Legislature, provides:
    For a license as a 'dealer' who sells
    any citrus fruit from door to door or
    from temporary locations, the sum of
    One Dollar ($1).
    You have asked whether persons described in section
    4 (b) (5) are "retailer[sl" within the meaning of section 22
    and if so which provision prevails. The word "retailer" is
    not defined in the Act. However, we need not fully explore
    the scope of the meaning of "retailer" for in our view even
    were these vendors within the normal definition of "retailer,"
    the new section 4(b)(5) clearly removes them from the scope
    of that term as used in section 22.
    p. 3228
    The Honorable John C. White - page 2      (H-764)
    It is well established that in the case of conflict
    between statutory provisions the later enacted and more
    specific provisions must control. 53 Tex.Jur. Zd, Statutes,
    5s 100, 101, 143, 161, 187, and authorities cited therein.
    Since section 4(b)(5) is both the later enacted and more
    specific provision, it must control. Accordingly, it is our
    opinion that persons who sell citrus fruit door to door or
    from a temnorarv location are not “retailerlsl”     within the
    exemption contaked~in  section 22. See Paui v. Eggman, 
    53 Cal. Rptr. 237
    (Cal. Ct. App. 1966);xrest       v. Morgan, 
    7 N.Y.S.2d 988
    (Sup. Ct. N.Y. 1938).
    SUMMARY
    Section 4(b) (5) of article 118b prevails
    over section 22 of the same article.
    Thus, persons who sell citrus fruit door
    to door or from temporary locations are
    not within the exemption granted to
    "retailer[sl" in section 22.
    Very truly yours,
    Attorney General of Texas
    APPROVED:
    Ti&yiQ+y    KENDALL,~ First Assistant
    C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman
    Opinion Committee
    jwb
    pm 3229
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-764

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1976

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017