Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1975 )


Menu:
  • The Honorable   Jack E. Benson                                      Opinion   No.    H- 656
    Tarrant  County Auditor
    Tarrant  County Courthouse                                          Re:    Whether    a criminal    district
    Fort Worth,   Texas    76102                                        attorney   may be granted a salary
    increase    in mid-year     without
    following    the grievance    procedure
    of article    3912k, V. T. C.S.
    Dear   Mr.      Benson:
    You have      requested        our   opinion     regarding   whether      a criminal     district
    attorney      may be granted   a salary   increase  in mid-year                     without   following    the
    grievance      procedure   of article  3912k, V. T. C. S.
    Section    2(a)   of article     3912k provides:
    The salaries,    expenses,      and other allowances      of elected
    county and precinct     officers     shall be set each year during
    the regular   budget hearing       and adoption  proceedings      on
    giving notice as provided        by this Act.
    In Attorney      General   Opinion H-11 (1973),     we construed      this section   to mean
    that the salaries      of elected   county and precinct    officials,     haying once been
    set at a regular      budget hearing,      may not be increased       during   that fiscal year.
    Thus,    if a criminal    district   attorney    may be deemed      an elected    county or
    precinct    officer,   his salary    may not be increased      in mid-year      unless he
    invokes    the grievance      procedure     Fovided  by section     2(d) of article    3912k.
    We believe   it is clear that a criminal       district     attorney      is a district
    officer  rather than a county officer.        A criminal      district     attorney      is one “class
    or kind of district   attorneys.    ” Hill County v. Sheppard,             
    178 S.W.2d 261
    , 263
    (Tex.   Sup. 1944).   Furthermore,       the term “criminal          district     attorney”    means
    simply   “an attorney    for a criminal    district   court. ” la.,        at 263.      In Williams
    v. Huntress,    
    272 S.W.2d 87
    (Tex.       Sup. 1954), the Supreme              Court held that
    even a one-county     district   court is a “district     office.   ” 3,        at 88.     See also
    Bounds v. McCallum,         
    52 S.W.2d 1047
    , 1049 (Tex.          Sup. 1932).
    p.   2880
    The Honorable       Jack    E.       Benson      - page    2
    In addition,      article      6.05c,      Texas        Election   Code,      in listing   the order
    in which offices     must appear         on an election     ballot,   groups   the offices   into
    five categories:      federal,      statewide,    district,     county and precinct.        The offices
    of both district    attorney     and criminal      district    attorney    are included    under the
    category   of “district    office.    ” Finally,     article    3912e,   V. T. C. S.,   repeatedly
    recognizes      a distinction      between      “district    officers,   ” “county   officers,     ” and
    “precinct     officers.     ” Sections      1, 19(h), 19(l), 19(n), 19(q).         We believe      that
    these statutory        references      confirm      the implication      of Williams     V. 
    Huntress, supra
    ,     that a criminal       district    attorney,      even though his district         comprises
    only a single      county,     is a district      officer   rather than a county or precinct
    officer.     Accordingly,        it is our opinion        that the salary     payments      to the
    criminal     district    attorney     are not controlled         by section    2 of article     3912k.
    SUMMARY
    A criminal           district    attorney        is a district     officer    rather
    than a county or precinct      officer  and, as such,   is not
    required  to follow   the grievance    prbced’ure of arti.cle
    3912k in order   to receive   a salary increase.
    Very   truly    yours,
    Attorney       General     of Texas
    -ROVED:                             .
    C. ROBERT   HI                             

Document Info

Docket Number: H-656

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1975

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017