Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1974 )


Menu:
  •                TEEA~TORNICYGENERAL
    OF TrExAs
    Aua.rs~.      T-s          787ll
    October      21.   1974
    The Honorable  William H. Sk&on                             Opinion No.      H-   427
    Chairman,  Board of Pardons and Paroles
    Room 711, Stephen F. Austin Bldg.                           Re:   Availability under the
    Austin, Texas 78701                                               Open Records Act of
    files of the Board of
    Dear   Mr.   Skelton:                                             Pardons and Paroles
    You have asked whether the Board of Pardons and Paroles is required
    to make available its files on prisoners to the public and individual members
    of the Legislature.  You have directed our attention to Article 42.12,  Sec. 27,
    V. T. C. C. P., which provides:
    All information    obtained in connection with
    inmates of the Texas Department           of Corrections
    subject to parole or executive clemency           or indivi-
    duals who may be on parole and under the super-
    vision of the division,     or persons directly iden-
    tified in any proposed plan of release for a parolee,
    shall be privileged    information     and shall not be
    subject to public inspection:     provided,     however,
    that all such information      shall be available     to the
    Governor and the Board of Pardons and Paroles
    upon request.     It is further provided,      that statis-
    tical and general information        respecting the parole
    program and system,        including the names of pa-
    roled prisoners     and data recorded in connection
    with parole services,       shall be subject to public
    inspection at any reasonable        time.
    The Cpen Records      Act,   Article      6252-17a,      V. T. C. S.,    provides   in part
    that:
    Sec. 3. (a) All information      collected,
    assembled,    or maintained by governmental
    bodies pursuant to law or ordinance or in con-
    nection with the transaction  of official business
    is public information   and available to the public
    p.   1978
    The Honorable          William    H. Skelton,   page 2   (H-427)
    during         normal business hours of any govern-
    mental         body, with the following exceptions only:
    (1) information   deemed confidential by law,
    either Constitutional,   statutory, or by judicial
    decision:
    .   .   .
    By virtue of the language of Article 42.12,  Sec. 27, V. T. C. C. P.,
    indicating that parole information   on inmates is privileged   and not
    subject to inspection by the public,   we believe it is information  deemed
    confidential  by law and thus not required to be disclosed    to members
    of the public under the Open Records Act.
    The Open Records             Act also provides:
    Sec.    3(a) . . .
    (b) This section does not authorize withholding
    of information    or limit the availability    of records
    to the public, except as specifically       stated in this
    section.    This section is not authority to withhold
    information    from individual members        or committees
    of the legislature   to use for legislative     purposes.
    Sec.     14(a) . e .
    (c) This Act does not give authority to withhold
    information   from individual members    or committees
    of the Legislature  of the State of Texas to use for
    legislative        purposes.
    In Attorney General Opinion H-353 (1974) we considered     these pro-
    visions of the Open Records Act.      There we decided that while an agency
    could find no authority in the Open Records Act to deny a legislator’s
    request for information,    the Open Records Act did not give legislators
    access to information    made confidential by other statutes.   Both pro-
    visions of the Open Records Act which discuss legislative     access to
    information   are limited by their terms to the Open Records Act and do
    not support an interpretation   that the provisions were intended to affirm-
    atively open material    made confidential elsewhere.
    p* 1979
    The Honorable    William   H. Skelton.        page 3    (H-427)
    Due to the limited scope of your inquiry we do not consider the
    obligation of the Board to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued
    by a legislative     committee   or with a request by a co-ittee     to inspect
    the Board’s     files.  See, The Legislative     Reorganization  Act of 1961,
    Article   5429f, Sets.%       and 18. V. T. C.S.
    SUMMARY
    The Cpen Records Act does not require the Board
    of Pardons and Paroles to reveal its files on an inmate
    to an individual legislator.
    Very    truly yours,
    DAVID M. KENDALL,          Chairman
    Opinion Committee
    p.    1980
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-427

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1974

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017