Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1974 )


Menu:
  •                            AUIWXTN.   T-s            78711
    September      10. 1974
    The Honorable Mark White                       Opinion No,     H-   396
    Office of the Secretary of State
    Austin,  Texas                                 Re:     Certification  of political
    parties pursuant to Art.
    13.45,   Subd. 2. Texas
    Dear Secretary    White:                               Election Code.
    Subdivision 2 of Article 13.45 of the Texas Election Code. provides
    a means for (a) political parties whose nominee for governor in the last
    general election received less than 2 per cent of the total vote cast, or
    (b) a new party, or (c) a previously      existing  party that had no candidate
    for governor in the last election,    to nominate candidates for state-wide
    and local elections   by nomination at a convention.        However,    it requires
    as a condition to having the names of such candidates printed on the
    official ballot, that a list of the participants   in the precinct    conventions
    be filed with your office within 20 days after the party’s        state convention.
    The list, to be filed by the temporary       chairman of each precinct con-
    vention, must aggregate at least one per cent of the total votes cast for
    governor in the last preceding general election.         If there are insufficient
    names on the precinct lists,     they are to be supplemented       by a petition
    requesting that the party’s    name be printed on the ballot.
    The statute requires that: (1) the precinct list and the supplemental
    petition show the name, address and registration     certificate number of
    each signer;   (2) no person who voted that year in any primary or parti-
    cipated in any convention of any other party shell be eligible to sign: and
    (3) to each signer there must be administered    an oath as to the facts.
    At the time you certify to the county clerks of the State the list of
    candidates to be on the general ballot,  as required by Art. 1.03 of ‘the
    Election Code, you are required by Art.    13.45,  Subd, 2, to certify the
    names of the parties subject to that subdivision which had complied with
    its requirements.
    p.    1853
    .
    The Honorable    Mark   White,   page 2   (H-396)
    you have asked:
    1) May the Secretary     of State adopt reasonable   means
    to ascertain  if those citizens signing petitions pur-
    suant to Article 13.45,    subd. 2, Vernon’s   Texas
    Election Code are legally registered     voters?
    2) May the Secrets.ry of State utilize methods of statis-
    tical sampling to ascertain if those citizens signing the
    ” petitions pursuant to Art. 13.45,   subd. 2 are legally
    registered   voters?
    It is now.well established    in our law that the’officer    charged with cerr
    tifying the petition performs     a judicial and not a ministerial    function. City
    of El Paso v. Tuck, 
    282 S.W.2d 764
    (Tex. Civ. App.,          El Paso 1955, writ
    ref’d.,   n. r. e.) cert.den.,  
    352 U.S. 828
    .
    Such officer may adopt any means he believes to be right and proper to
    ascertain  the qualifications  of those signing the petition and his decision
    will not be disturbed in the absence of fraud or arbitrariness.      Akers v.
    Remington,    
    115 S.W.2d 714
    (Tax. Civ. App.,  Fort Worth 1938, writ dism. );
    City of El~Paso v. 
    Tuck, supra
    ; Attorney General Opinions O-488 (1939);
    O-7218 (1946); C-263 (1964); H-199 (1974).
    We therefore answer your first question in the affirmative.    As Secretary
    of State, you not only may, but you must, adopt reasonable     means to ascertain
    if those who sign petitions required by Subdivision 2 of Article 13.45 of the
    Texas Election Code are legally registered   voters.
    What are reasonable      means may vary according      to the circumstances.
    Whether statistical     sampling will satisfy the requirement    will depend upon
    your satisfaction    that an actual examination   of each signature is impossible
    and that the sample is sufficiently     large and is chosen in such a way that it
    will reflect the status of all signers within a close degree of reliability.     No
    particular   petition or sampling method is before us. and we have neither
    the facts nor the expertise     to determine whether a specific sampling method
    in a specific instance is proper.
    p. 1854
    The Honorable          Mark    White,   page 3 (H-396)
    We therefore answer your second question that, although the normal
    and preferred  method would be an actual        counting of the signatures,
    where circumstances     indicate its necessity,   you are not necessarily   pre-
    cluded from utilizing methods of statistical     sampling to ascertain if
    those signing the petitions filed pursuant to Subdivision 2 of Article 13.45
    of the Election Code ar~e, in fact,legally    registered  voters.
    ~SUMMARY
    The Secretary  of State, in determining whether
    persons signing petitions pursuant to Subdivision 2
    of Article 13.45 of the Election Code are legally
    registered  voters,  may adopt such reasonable     means
    as he feels will be right and proper.    In some’cir-
    cumstances             the use of statistical        sampling   may be
    permissible.
    Very    truly yours,
    Attorney    General    of Texas
    APPFoYED:
    ,,(,
    i
    3
    I
    1
    LA.&           . wT
    YO   K> Firs      Assistant
    ---.
    DAVID M. KENDALL,                  Chairman
    Opinion Committee
    p.   1855
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-396

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1974

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017