Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1974 )


Menu:
  • f          -
    T``A~TORNEYGISNERAL
    OF     TEXAS
    AUSTIN.     .,?SXAS      78711
    August    21,   1974
    The Honorable Roy W. Mouer                                   Opinion   No.   H-   376
    Securities    Commissioner
    State Securities   Board                                     Re: Whether person making
    704 State Finance Building                                   secondary    sale of savings
    Austin,    Texas                                             association   stock is required
    to be registered   as dealer
    under Securities    Act and
    related questions.
    Dear Mr.        Mouer:
    You have requested our opinion on the following questions                        regarding
    permanent reserve fund stock issued by savings association:
    1. Is a person or company making secondary
    sales (i. e., sales other than by the issuer) of
    savings association    [permanent reserve fund]
    stock required to be registered    as a dealer or
    salesman    under The Securities   Act, (Article
    591-1, et seq.,   V. T. C.S.), if not otherwise
    exempted from registration     by Section 5 of
    The Securities   Act?
    2. Are sales of sayings association    [permanent
    reserve fund] subject to the anti-fraud   provisions
    (Sections 23.A, 29. C, 32 and 33.A) of the Securities
    Act?
    Section   11. bl of Article   85Za,   the Savings      and Loan Association
    Act,       reads:
    p.   1766
    The Honorable   Roy W.    Mouer    page 2          (H-376)
    Savings associations,    the officers, employees
    or agents,   savings accounts and the permanent
    reserve   stock thereof,   and the sale issuance  or
    offering of savings accounts and permanent reserve
    fund stock of any association     or Federal savings and
    loan association   are hereby exempted from all pro-
    visions of law of this State, other than this Act,
    which provide for supervision,      registration or regula-
    tion in connection with the sale, issuance or offering
    of securities, and the sale, issuance or offering of any
    such accounts or stock shall be legal without any action
    or approval whatsoever     on the part of any official,
    other than the Commissioner,       authorized to license,
    regulate,   or supervise  the sale, issuance or offering
    of securities.   (Emphasis added)
    Your questions are prompted by an apparent conflict between this
    provision   of the Savings and Loan Act (Acts 1963, 58 Leg., ch. 113, p. 269)
    and its caption.
    The Texas Constitution,    Art. 3, Section,5,   requires  that the title
    or caption of a bill give notice of its contents.   This provision insures
    that the Legislature  and the public will not be misled and inadvertently
    allow the passage of unintended legislation.
    The caption   to the Savings   and Loan Act reads    in part:
    . . . exempting savings accounts from securities
    laws; . . . providing that outstanding shares,    stock,
    share accounts and i,nvestment certificates   (excep_t
    Permanent Reserve    Fund Stock) shall be considered
    as savings accounts;  . . . (emphasis added).
    Notwithstanding  the emphasi,zed language,    Section 11.01 also purports to
    exempt reserve fund stock from the securities      laws of the state.   In our
    opinion, the caption and a porti,on of Section 11.01 are in irreconcilable
    conflict.
    p.   1767
    The Honorable    Roy W.   Mouer    page 3    (H-376)
    Only that part of the act in direct conflict with the title is void unless
    the “invalid parts are inextricably  interwoven in the texture of the Act so
    as to render the entire Act invalid. ” Fletcher v. State,      
    439 S. W. 2d 656
    ,
    659 (Tex. 1969);   Hayman Construction     Co. v. American    Indemnity Co..,
    
    471 S. W. 2d 564
     (Tex. 1971); State v. Blackwell,    
    500 S. W. 2d 97
     (Tex.
    Crim.   1973).  The inclusion or exclusion of permanent reserve fund stock
    in the exemption provision   does not affect the rest of the Act.
    ,If having struck the unconstitutional    part, the result ia broader
    legislation    than originally  enacted,  the whole act must fail. Texas-Louisiana
    Power Co. v. City of Farmersville,           
    67 S. W. 2d 235
     (Tex. Comm. App.
    1933).    In the present case the removal of permanent reserve fund stock
    from the exemption of Section 11.01 results in narrower legislation.           The
    Act contains a severance       clause.   We think the courts would view the
    caption defect as voiding only that which is in conflict with the caption,
    but as not affecting the rest of the Act.
    The Securities    Act, Article 581-1, et seq.,   V. T. C. S., applies to
    all transactions   involving permanent reserve fund stock.        Persons   making
    secondary    sales of savings association   permanent reserve fund stock may
    be required to register     thereunder,  and the anti-fraud   provisions  of that
    Act may be applied to such sales unless specifically        exempted by Sections
    5 and 6 of the Securities    Act.
    SUMMARY
    Section 11.01 of the Savings and Loan Act, Article
    852a, does not exempt savings and loan permanent
    reserve fund stock from otherwise applicable provisions
    of the Securities Act.   Article 581-1, et seq., V. T. C.S.
    Very   truly yours.
    p.   1768
    The Honorable   Roy W. Mouer   page 4          (H-376)
    APPROVED:
    DAVID M . KENDALL,      Chairman
    Opinion Committee
    p.   1769
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H-376

Judges: John Hill

Filed Date: 7/2/1974

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017