Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1972 )


Menu:
  • Honorable Tom Hanna                        Opinion   No.   M-1263
    Crlmlnal Dlstrlct Attorney
    Jefferson      County                      Re:   Whether State buying
    Beaumont, Texas                                  in real property at
    delinquent tax sale
    may sell same before
    expiration  of two year
    redemption period, or
    may rent Same and
    apply rent to taxes or
    general revenue fund,
    Dear Mr.      Hanna:                             and related questlons.
    We have received your request for an Opinion        from this
    office   on the following numbered questions:
    “1.      After  the State has bought In property at
    a delinquent tax sale, may It then sell such
    property before the two year redemption period
    Is up?
    “2.      May the State and County collect rent from
    a tenant who Is living on the property after
    the State and County has taken in such property
    at a tax sale?
    “3.     If your answer to questlon number 2 was yes,
    please advise as to whether or not the rent
    money must be applied to taxes or whether or not’
    it may be put Into the general fund like any other
    County revenues ?
    “4 .    If the rent Is applied to the taxes, what must
    the State and County do with the property after
    the taxes are paid In full?
    “5.     If rent money Is collectible   after the State
    has bought in said property,   must the State and
    County prorate each rent payment an;:.?g the other
    taxing unita that were Tialntlffs    ln tne origins3
    tax case?”
    .   .
    Honorable   Tom Hanna,   Page 2    (M-1263)
    Article  7345b, Section 9, Vernon’s Civil Statutes,       provii
    among other things, that If property be sold to any taxing
    unit which Is a party to the kdament in said suit.         the title
    to said property‘shail   be bid-in-and   held by sald taxi
    for the use and benefit of Itself     and all other tax-i--=%2
    ng un
    which arnartleme           sum        which kve been ad.ludaed fo
    vldes tMte       taxing unlt may sill    and convey the property
    so purchased by it at any tlms In any manner determined to be
    most advantageous to said taxkg      unfts either at public or
    private sale, subject to any then exlstlng right of redemptior
    It may be polnted out here th t thi       Section was enacted i
    1947 (Acts 50th Leg., Reg. Se&         ps 1061) and amended then
    earlier statutes   on this subjeci’which    are Articles 7288 and
    7289.
    Articles  7288 and 7289, Vernon’s Civil Statutes,     pro-
    vide In substance,     that upon failure   of sale of any real
    estate at tax sale Sor want of a purchaser, it shall be bid
    off’ to the State   for the taxes and penalties    due, and all
    costs accruing thereon, conveyed to the State and held by it
    until the same shall have been redeemed by the owner within
    two years from the date of the deed to the State or Is sold
    by the State.     Article   7328, Vernon’s Civil Statut.es, insofar
    as pertinent to this Inquiry, provides -for the public sale
    OS the land so conveyed to the State and not redeemed within
    the tlms prescribed      by law, and that the proceeds of such
    sale, after deducting and paying the amount of the county tax
    to the County Treasurer, shall be sent to the State Treasurer
    The next Soregoing mentioned articles    were Involved in
    Attorney General Opinion No. O-3405 lgkl),       which held in
    substance that where property was or I ginally bid off jointly
    to county, city and state following     a delinquent tax judgment
    the State’s    portion of rents accruing from the property after
    the period of redemption expired and prior to final fore-
    closure sale should be handled by the State Treasurer       in the
    same manner as If it were the proceeds of the original       tax
    foreclosure   . The effect .ol this opinion 1s that the taxing
    authorities    were deemed to have had the authority to collect
    rents for the use of such property during the period of time
    they held the title    to same. Our Texas Suoreme Court in
    Spak v. City of Dallas, 
    111 Tex. 350
    , 355; 235 S .W. 513, (19
    nela tat,
    property .Sn a thing consists not merely In
    Its   &ershlp    and possession, but In the unrestricted
    -6197-
    Honorable   Tom Hanna, page 3         (M-1263)
    right of use,, enjoyment and disposal.  Anything which
    destroys any of these elements of property,  to that
    extent destroys the property itself.   The substantial
    value of the property lies In Its use.”
    Hence, It Is apparent that the benefits         and profits    from the
    use of property belong to the holder of the ownership and
    posseeslon     of such property.      Your query Involves rents
    accrued during the time the State and County held the title
    and possession      of the real property In question.       Thus, the
    State and County are entitled         to the rents the same as rents
    and profits     accruing on any other property owned by them,
    58 Tex. Jur.2d, 470 Vendor and Purchaser, Sec. 250.              This
    being so, It necessarily       follows that the rental money so
    collected     should be retained by the State and County and
    placed to their credit in their respective          funds.   It Is .not
    proceeds from the original        salt of the property as 1s rt-
    qulrtd to be applied toward the payment of the delinquent
    taxes owed by the former owner of the Droptrty as might be
    Inferred from certain language in said Opinion No. o-3405.
    Such a mlsappllcatlon      of the rent money to the credit of
    one no longer holding title         to the property would be a
    rtstrlctlon     of the legal owner’s rlght of use,      enjoyment and
    disposal     of the property,   over and above the mtre right of
    redemption allowed for-the        two year statutory   period.     We
    believe     that In ‘this regard Opinion No. O-3405 should be
    interpreted      to merely designate the State Treasurer as the
    proper recipient      of the rent money belonging to the State as
    general revenue.
    In view of the foregoing,   your numbered questions art
    answer by the following  correspondingly numbered paragraphs:
    1.    The State may sell real property purchased at
    tax salt, before expiration  of the two years
    redemption period.
    2.    The State and County are authorized to collect rent
    from a tenant of real property purchased at a tax sale.
    3.    The rent money accruing from renl’property    after its
    purchase by the State at a tax sale anti held for the
    benefit of Itself   and the County, belongs to the
    State and County in proportion    to the amounts secured
    by their respective   liens, and should be deposited
    Into the respective   funds of said bodies like any
    other revenues collected.
    -6198-
    i
    Honorable    Tom Hanna, page 4        (M-IL63)
    4.     The  rent accruing :fttr the foreclosure sale
    belongs to the State and County and is not appllc-
    able as credit on tht delinquent taxes of the
    former owner of the property.
    5.     Any rent money accrued and collected  on real
    property after pUrChaSt of same by the State and
    County at tax salt and before final sale thereon,
    should be prorated among the taxing units adjudged
    to have tax litnt against said property.
    SUMMARY
    The following  holdings art made relative   to real
    property purchased at delinquent ad valorem tax salt:
    (1) The State may sell the property before expiration
    o? the two year redemption period.     (2) The State and
    County art authorized to rent the property.     Rent money
    accruing from the property after Its purchase belongs
    . pro rata to the taxing units and should be deposited
    Sor their use In their respective    funds like any other
    revenues collected.     Rent money on such property accruing
    after foreclosure   salt and before final salt should be
    prorated among taxing units having liens on property.
    Prepared by Robert    Lattlmort
    Assistant Attorney    General
    -6199-
    Honorable    Tom Hanna, page 5      (M-1263)
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chalrman
    W.E. Allen, Co-Chalrmtn
    Slg Aronson
    Lang Baker
    Llnward Shivers
    Roland Allen
    SAMUELD. m: DANIEL
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFREDWALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLAWHITE
    First Assistant
    -6200-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-1263

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1972

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017