-
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ,OF TEXAS Aus~nv. -78711 Sept.embsrlS~ 1972 Honorable C. J. Eden .,Opinion No. M- 1218 County Attorney Stephens County.~ Rer Authority of the Com- 110 East -Walker missioners Court to Breckenridge, Texas 76024 grant a permit to a corporation for use of,right-oi,lrlaysof county roads for locating pipeline for transmission . ~of water in connection with water flood operation Dear Mr. Eden: in oil p.roduction. '. We have received your recent request, .accompanied by your able brief, for an opinion of this department on the following question: ,"Whether or not the Conmkssidners Court of Stephens County or.a Commissioner of said county has the authority.to grant a permit or license to give consent for a Texas corporation, quali- fied.as a public utility, to lay pipeline along the right-of,-way of a county .road.for the trans- mission of water to a s,econd corporation, ,an oil produoing'corporation, for use.,,inwater-floe@ operations :inzo'nne&ion with.the production of oil." Yourletter which~accompanied your request indicates that the applicant is. "Gra-Pet Gas,Company, a~Texas ,corpora- tion, which corporation is classified as a public utility. . . .'I An examination of the Articles of Incorporation of the Gra-Pet Gas Company leaves considerable doubt in our mind Hon. C. J. Eden, page 2, (M-1218) as to whether the purpose clause gives the corporation the authority to buy and sell water. Nor do we find in the arti- cles any provision which would classify the corporation as a public utility in connection with the sale of water. We are of then opinion that absent an amendment to the articles to remedy the above stated deficiencies, the Commissioners Court has no power to grant the permit, nor doesthe corporation have the right to lay the lines. We are of the opinion, however, that a Texas corpor- ation with authority to sell and transport water as a public utility would have the right under Article 1433, Vernon's Civil Statutes, so far as the county is concerned, to lay its lines along the right of'way of a county road. Article 1433 reads as follows: "Any water corporation shall have the power to sell and furnish such quantities of water as may be required by the city, town or village where located for public or private buildings or for other purposes; and such corporation shall have the power to lay pipes, mains and conductors for conducting water through the streets, alleys, lanes and squares ,of any such city, town or vil- lage, with the consent of the governing body thereof, and under such regulations as it may prescribe. Such cornoration is further author- ized to lav its pipes, mains and conductors and,other~ fixtures forconductinq~water throuqh, under, alonq, across and over all'public roads, streets and waters lvinq and situated outside the territorial limits of any such city: town, or villaqe in such manner as not to incommode the public in the use of such roads, streets and waters. Any such corporation shall notify the State Highway Commission, or the Commissioners Court having jurisdiction,' as the case may be, -5973- . Hon. C. J. Eden, page 3; (~-1218) when. it.proposed-to build 1ines:along the right of way of any.State Highway, or county road;. outside the limits ofiany 'incorporated city'or town, whereupon theyHighway .Commission, or the Commissioners Court'may~, if. it SOS desires,~ designate the'place alon the,right,of,way: where such lines shall be constructed. The public-agency, having' jurisdiction' or 'control of ~a highway:$or county'.ruad,:that isi the:.:. Highways Commission~orthe Commiss%oners- Court, :be, may-:require.any such cor- .:as:the,-:case~,may poration, at its 'bwn,,expense;:to. relocate:its lines on a State Highway or county road outside ..the:.limits, _.._ ., ofan inaorporated..city:or~town; so ,, asto-permit~'the &$&ng~:,or charqfng pf: trafffq. ,~:.lanes. by.giving thirty,,..QC)-days'~writtenhotic,e tosuch .corp&ati'on~'a&specifying .the'line or,' ..linesYto``.be.moved,``~and indicatirq the pla&on, the,ne~.~right of way,were ~such-line or lines. .mny,-.be,..placed.. 'When deemed necessary'to:pre- ': ,..serve.~the.public health;~ any company .or corpora- ,tion-chartered:under:the.-laws of this .State::for the purpose.lof.,,,constructing:waterworks or' fur-." ni,shing water supply :ta'.anycity .ortown,. shall. have::the.right:of :emin'entdomain ~to condemn.' ,private property ~necessary.',for the construction of supply reservoirs:~or standpipes~ for water work.:Actsl87.4, ‘p. 134; G.L. ,Vol. 8. p. '136: Acts'l909, .p. 8; Acts 1949.;.51st.Leg.. p. 137~0, ch. 622, S 1." (Emphasis added.) ,t: ,,Attorney.lOene~al'e'.Opi~ion,Nb;M-508 (1969) includes 'the follautin~.:pete~ne~t'~ l&+aQ&: . "It has been recognized further that.it is in the public interest to,receive utility services: therefore; oublic;utilities~ are authorized to use ~the streets-and highways.:"Gtate v. City of',Austin' (State,v. ~City.of-,Dallasj; 160 Tex. '348; 331 S.W;2d 131 (1960). -5974- I Hon. C. J. Eden, page 4, (M-1218) "The Legislature acting for the State has primary and plenary power to control public roads and streets. Recognizing this proposition,'the Court in State v. City of Dallas (State v. City of Austin),
319 S.W.2d 767(Tex.Civ.App. 1959. aff.
331 S.W.2d 737) said at page 773: 'There can be no question but that the Legislature can lawfully,,permit cities and private corporations to place facilities in streets and highways to provide essential utility.service for the public, . . .' "The Legislature has seen fit to grant direct statutory authorization to public utilities to use public roads~.and~hiqhwavs. Some,such authority isfound in Articles 1416, .1433, 1436a and 143633, Vernon's Civil Statutes. .IGuld therefore appear that Article 6203d, Vernon's Civil Statutes, would be rendered inapplicable to the q'uestion presented, since no additional grant of an easement would be necessary in order to entitle public utilities to take advantage of the right-of-way of existing public roadways. Accordingly, the Texas Board of Corrections would not be obligated to collect, nor public utilities required to pay, for placing lines in, on, along or across existing public roadways traversing State land under the custody and control of the Texas Department of Corrections." (Emphasis added.) In view of all of the foregoing, a Texas water corporation, qualified as a public utility, hasthe right to lay its pipes along the right of way of county roads pursuant to Article 1433. Note that we have held that under certain facts, the corporation has the right to lay its lines. This is under authority of the Legislature as expressed in Article 1433 and -5975- Hon. C. J. Eden, page 5, (M-1218) is not pursuant .to any permit issued by the county. Indeed, the statute does not provide for a permit except as to where on the right,of way the pipes shall be laid. We make the above statement for the reason that the question hae~ been raised of ~claims that the abutting land owners might have against the county where the county right of way has been obtained by ,prescription, ,As we interpret Article 1433, the county is not a party to any .action taken by the corporation. Such action is under authority of a legislative.enactment, and the doctrine of sovereign immunity protects the State from suit. With reference to the right under.a State statute of the utility to lay its lines, see Heldt v. Southwestern Bell Te1ephon.e Co., 482 S.W.Zd 352, 356 (Tex.Civ.App. 1972) where the Court wrote, in what we co,nsider a'valid analogy: "Appellee. under the authority of Article 'V.A.C.S.., is authorized to erect its poles, .~1464~, w~ires and other fixtures along, upon and across any public roads,, streets and waters-of Texas, subjeot only to the restriction that same must be done~ in a manner as not to incommode the pub- lic inthe use of such roads, streets, and waters; This is a right granted by the State.which cannot be denied by a municipality or city. . . ." (Emphasis added.) SUMMARY ------- A Texas, corporation, provided it is quali- fied as a water corporation and as a public utility, has,the right under Article 1433, Vernon's Civil Statutes, to lay its pipes along the right of way of county roads, subject to the conditions set out in said Article. -597 6- . Hon. C. J. Eden, page 6, (~-1218) truly yours, Prepared by James S. Swearingen Assistant Attorney Gener~al APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman Pat Bailey Jack Sparks Charles Lind Scott Garrison SAMUEL D. MCDANIEL Staff Legal Assistant ALFREDWALKER mecutive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant -5977-
Document Info
Docket Number: M-1218
Judges: Crawford Martin
Filed Date: 7/2/1972
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017