Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1972 )


Menu:
  • Hon. Bill T. Swanson, Chairman      Opinion No. M- 1194
    Oil, Gas, and Mining Committee
    House of Representatives            Re:   Whether office holders,
    State Capitol Building                    such as judges~,may
    Austin, Texas 78711                       simultaneously hold
    office on the boards
    of regents of State
    Dear Representative Swanson:              institutions.
    Your recent letter requesting the opinion of this
    office concerning the referenced matter states as follows.:
    "As chairman of the Oil and Gas Committee,
    I respectfully request an opinion from your
    office in regard to office holders, such as
    judges, also holding office on the Board of
    Regents of State institutions. I personally
    feel that this is in conflict with the State
    constitution, however, your office may clarify
    same. ”
    Section 33 of Article XVI of the Constitution of
    Texas, as amended in 1967, provides, in pertinent part, as
    follows:
    "The Accounting Officers of this State
    shall neither draw nor pay a warrant upon the
    Treasury in favor'of any~person for salary or
    compensation  as agent, officer or appointee,
    who holds at the same time any other office
    or position of honor, trust, or profit, under
    this State, except as prescribed in this Con-
    stitution. . . It is further provided, until
    September 1, 1969, and thereafter only if
    -5828-
    Won. Bill T. Swanson, page 2, (M-1194)
    authorized by the Legislature by general law
    under such restrictions and limitations as the
    Legislature may prescribe, that a non-elective
    State officer or employee may hold other non-
    elective offices or positions of honor, trust,
    or profit under this State or the United States,
    if the other offices or positions are of benefit
    to the State of Texas or are required by State
    or federal law, and there is no conflict with
    the original office or position for which he
    receives salary or compensation. . . .. (emphasis
    added.)
    Pursuant to the authorization contained in Section
    33, as amended, the Legislature enacted Article 6252-9a,
    Vernon's Civil Statutes, which, in substance, allows a non-
    elective State officer to hold another non-elective State or
    federal office when such dual office holding is of benefit
    to the State of Texas and is not incompatible with the orig-
    inal office held.
    Section 40 of Article XVI of the Constitution of
    Texas provides, in pertinent part, that:
    "NO person shall hold or exercise at the
    same time, more than one Civil Office of emolu-
    ment. . . .(I
    For purposes of your opinion request, we are assuming
    that the "judges" to whom you refer are elected officials and
    that they are paid their salaries by the State of Texas. We
    further assume that the members of the boards of regents to
    whom you refer receive no compensation from the State for
    their services as regents.
    In accordance with the hypothetical set of facts
    set forth in the preceding paragraph, Section 
    40, supra
    , is
    not applicable to your opinion request, inasmuch as a non-
    salaried regent does not hold a "civil office of emolument"
    -5829-
    Hon. Bill T. Swanson;page?,     .(M-119.4):::
    within the meaning of that Section. See Whithead v. Julian,
    
    476 S.W.2d 844
    (Tex.Sup.1972); Attorney General% Opinions
    NOS. M-409 (1969) and and M-042 (1971).
    Further, neither the proviso to the 1967 amendment
    to Section 
    33, supra
    , nor Article 6252-9a is applicable to
    your request, as both of those provisions apply.only to one
    holding two non-elective positions; we reiterate that we are
    assuming that the "judges" to whom you refer hold elective
    office.
    Thus, the only constitutional provision that remains
    apposite to your request is the first sentence of Section 33,
    
    quoted supra
    . In accordance with that provision, you are
    advised'that, in the event the elected, State-salaried judges
    to whom you refer are appointed to and accept a non-salaried
    position as members of the boards of regents of State institu-
    tions, they would not be entitled to receive any State compen-
    sation for the judicial positions they now hold. Bovett v.
    Calvert, 
    467 S.W.2d 205
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1971, error ref. n.r.e.)
    SUMMARY
    -------
    (1) Pursuant to Section 40 of Article XVI
    of the Constitution of Texas, the position of a
    non-salaried member of the board of regents of a
    State institution is not a "civil office of
    emolument" within the meaning of that Section.
    (2) Pursuant to Section 33 of Article XVI
    of the Constitution of Texas, an elected, State-
    salaried judge may also ho.ldthe non-salaried
    office of regent of a State-supported institution,
    but if so, he may receive no compensation from
    the State for his position as judge.
    C. MARTIN
    ney General of Texas
    -5830-
    Hon. Bill T. Swanson, page 4, W-1194)
    Prepared by Austin C. Bray, Jr.
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    Roger Tyler                             .
    Jack Sparks
    James Broadhurst
    Houghton Brownlee
    SAMUELD.MCDANIEL
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFREDWALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -5831-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-1194

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1972

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017