Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1972 )


Menu:
  •                        August25, 1972
    Hon. James P. Baker, Chairman        Opinion No. M-1193
    Texas Board of Licensure for
    Nursing Home Administrators       Re:   Reconciliation of Section
    P. 0. Box 4246                             3, Subsection (9), and
    Austin, Texas 78767                        Section 10, Subsection (61,
    of Article 4442d, the Texas
    Board of Licensure for Nurs-
    ing Rome Administrators Act,
    relating to deposit and
    withdrawal of fees and
    monies received by the
    Dear Mr. Baker:                            Board.
    In your recent original and supplemental requests you
    asked our office for,an opinion on the following questions:
    Question 1. Should the Board of Licensure
    for Nursing Home Administrators comply with Article
    4442d, Section 10(6), or with the newly added
    Section 3(9) of Article 44428, Vernon's Civil
    Statutes, or may it choose to comply with which-
    ever provision it deems most suited to its duties?
    Question 2. If the Board must comply with
    Section 3(g), is the Board required to deposit
    all of its funds into the State Treasury, or is
    it required to deposit only the money received
    from the license fees?
    Question 3. If the Board must comply with
    Section 3(g), must the Board deposit all license
    fee receipts with the State Treasury,=   does the
    requirement affect only those license fees re-
    ceived after June 15, 1971, which is the effective
    date of the amendment requiring license fees to
    be deposited into the State Treasury?
    Question 4. Is the appropriations bill~to be
    considered a "special" law? If so, can it amend
    the Act, which appears to be a general law?
    -5824-
    Hon. James P. Baker, page 2    (M-1193)
    Question 5. Is a special fund created by the
    appropriations bill?
    When a bill becomes law and material is added to the
    law at a later time by an amendment, it is presumed that the
    Legislature intended that the old law remain in effect unless
    the amendment contains an expressed or implied repeal of the old
    law or unless there is such an irreconcilable conflict that both
    cannot remain in effect. Cole v. State, 
    106 Tex. 472
    , 
    170 S.W. 1036
    (1914); Hankins v. Connally, 206 S.W.Zd 89 (Tex.Civ.App.
    1947, error ref. n.r.e.); County of Harris v. Tennessee Products
    Pipe Line Co., 
    332 S.W.2d 777
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1960, no writ);
    Howth v. Case (J.E.) Threshing Machine Co., 
    280 S.W. 238
    (Tex.
    Civ.App. 1925, error ref.); Hunnicut v. Lee, 16 S.W.Zd 968 (Tex:
    Civ.App. 1929, no writ).
    Texas does not favor repeal by implication, but does
    favor considering laws relating to the same subject as though
    thev
    ---.a
    were included in the same act so as to harmonize and give
    effect to them. &chardson v. Cameron County, 275 S.W.Zd 709
    (Tex.Civ.App. 19!
    55, no writ): Gordon v. LaIce, 
    163 Tex. 392
    , 356
    s.w.Zd 138 (1962)~ f International Service Int3. Co. v. Jackson,
    
    335 S.W.2d 420
    (Texm                          ~- n-T--e.
    pp. 1960, error rei-          _
    -----T-,-
    It is also presumed that when two statutes are in pari
    materia,,but it may be impossible to completely reconcile them,~
    the older statute will be repealed by implication only to the
    extent of the actual irreconcilable conflict. Whittenberq v.
    Craven, 
    250 S.W. 152
    (Tex. Comm.App. 1924); Townsend v. Terrell,
    1118x.   463, 
    16 S.W.2d 1063
    (Tex.Comm.App,.1929); Meek v.44
    Wheeler County, 124 S.W.Zd 331 (Tex.Civ.App. 1939) aff'd 1
    S.W.Zd 885; Firbt Nat. Bank v. Lee County Cotton Oil Co., 
    250 S.W. 313
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1923) aff'd 
    274 S.W. 127
    .
    Two statutes are under consideration here. Article
    4442d, Section 10(6), Vernon's Civil Statutes, was enacted in
    1969 and reads as follows:
    "~11 fees or other monies received by said
    board under this law shall be deposited to the
    account of the board in federally insured ac-
    counts and shall be Daid out on vouchers duly
    issued in a manner directed by the board. Ail
    mnniaa
    _..---- -- so --------
    -- received and placed to the accountof
    the board may be us--  ed -~
    bv the
    _``~board in defraying
    its expenses In carrying on izhe provisions of
    -5825"
    Hon. James P. Baker, page 3     (M-1193)
    this law. No expenses incurred by said board
    shall be paid by the State." (Emphasis added;)
    Article 44428, Section 3(9), Vernon's Civil Statutes,
    was added in 1971, effective June 15, 1971, and reads as follows:
    "All license fees shall be deposited in
    the state treasury." (Emphasis added.)
    Article 4442d, Section 3(9), creates an irreconcilable
    conflict with Article 44426, Section lO(6). As a result you are
    advised that Article 4442d, Section 10(6), which allows all monies
    collected by the Texas Hoard of Licensure for Nursing Home Ad-
    ministrators to be expended by the Board for its operations is
    now limited by Article 4442d, Section 3(9).
    The Board, under Article 4442d, Section 10(3), is autho-
    rized to set an initial license fee not to exceed one hundred
    dollars ($100) for a two-year period. A renewal license fee,
    also not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) for the biennium,
    is also authorized. In addition, the Legislature has specifical-
    ly authorized the Board to collect an examination fee of seventy
    dollars ($70). This fee,which must accompany the application
    for the required examination and is not refundable, is to be
    used for investigation, processing and testing purposes. In
    addition, reasonable fees may be set for the issuance of copies
    of public records in the Board's office , certificates or transcripts,
    and duplicates of lost instruments.
    From the fees collected, the Board must deposit the
    initial license fee and the renewal license fee to the State
    Treasury. All other fees may be deposited to the account of
    the Board under Article 44428, Section lO(6).
    The Third Called Session of the Sixty-Sfcond Legis-
    lature in 1972 passed a general appropriation act which'was a
    general, not a special, law. This act contains an appropriation
    for )jhisBoard's operation out of the Nursing Home Administrators
    Fund . In making this appropriation the Legislature made an ap-
    propriation back to the Board from those funds which should have
    62nd Leg., 3rd C.S. 1972, S.B. 1.
    22., 111-105-106.
    1Acts
    -5826-
    Hon. James~P. Baker, page 4     (M-1193)
    been paid into the State Treasury since June 15, 1971, the ef-
    fective date of Article 44426, .Section3(9).
    SUMMARY,
    The Board of Nursing Home Administrators must
    deposit the initial license fee, which may not ex-
    ceed one hundred dollars ($100) for the biennium,
    and the renewal license fee, which also may not
    exceed one hundred dollars ($100) for the biennium,
    into the State Treasury beginning June 15, 1971.
    All other fees and monies received by the Board
    shall be deposited to the account of the Board
    as provided in Article 4442d, Section 10(6), Vernon's
    Civil Statutes.
    Prepared by Linda Neeley
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    Jim Swearingen
    Harriet Burke
    James Hackney
    Robert Lemens
    SAMUEL D. MCDANIEL
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -5827-