Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  •                      THE   ATTORNEY                  GENERAL
    OF%%XAS
    .AUSTIN.       TEXAR     78711
    t:HUAWWHD   C.   MAHTIN
    November 15, 1971
    Honorable Jinmy Morris                      Opinion No. M- 997
    Criminal District Attorney
    Navarro County Courthouse                   Re: Construction of Sec. 12, 33
    Coreicana, Texas 75110                          and 40 of Art. XVI, Conet.
    of Texas, and Art. 6252-9a,
    V.C.S., relating to certain
    city offices and Aeeietant
    Dear Mr. Morris:                                Poetuaeter.
    Your recent letter requesting the opinion of this office
    concerning the referenced matter poses the following questions:
    "1. Can a man 8erve a city as Civil Service
    Conmissioner (non-salary office) for the Police
    and Fire Departments and at the earnatime serve
    the same city as a member of the Board of Equali-
    zation (also a non-salary office)?
    "2. Can a man nerve ae Civil Service Corn-
    missioner for the Police and Fire Departments and
    at the saxe time be Aesietant Postmaster (a federal
    .
    office paying a salary)?"
    For purposes of this opinion we assume these offices serve a
    city or town and are non-elective.
    The following provisions of the Constitution of Texas are
    pertinent to your inquiry:
    "No . . . person holding or exercising any
    office.of profit or trust, under the United
    States,  or either of them, . . . ehall . . .
    hold or exercine any office of profit or trust
    under thie State." Article XVI, Section 12.
    -4863-
    Honorable Jimmy Morris,   page 2   (M-997)
    "The Accounting Officers of this State shall
    neither draw nor pay a warrant upon the Treasury
    in favor of any person for salary or compensation
    as agent, officer or appointee, who holds at the
    same time any other office or position of honor.
    trust, or profit, under this State, except as pre-
    scribed in this Constitution . . . It is further
    provided, _ . . if authorized by the Legislature
    by general law under such restrictions and limita-
    tions as the Legislature may prescribe, that a non-
    elective .State officer or employee may hold other
    non-elective offices or positions of honor, trust, or
    profit under this State or the United States, if the other
    offices or positions are of benefit to the State of
    Texas or are required by State or federal law, and
    there is no conflict with the original office or position
    for which he receives salary or compensation . . . n
    Article   XVI, Section 33,
    "No person shall hold or exercise, at the same
    time, more than one Civil Office of emolument,
    exceptthat of Justice of Peace, County Commissioner,
    Notary Public and Postmaster . . . unless otherwise
    specially provided herein." Article XVI, Section 40.
    Pursuant to the authorization contained in the 1967 amend-
    ment to Section 33 of Article 
    XVI, supra
    . the Legielature. in
    1969, enacted Article 6252~?a which p-&ides, in-full, as
    follows:
    "Section 1. A nonelective state officer or
    emnlovee may hold other nonelective offices or
    positions of honor, trust, or nrofit under this
    state or the United States, if his holdins the
    other offices or positions is of benefit to
    the State of Texas or is required by state or
    federal law, and if there is no conflict betwean
    his holding the office or uoaition and his hold-
    inq the oriqinal office or wsition for which the
    officer or employee receives salary or compensation.
    -4864-
    -
    Wonorable Jimmy Morris. page 3       W-997)
    “Sec. 2.  Before a nonelective atate officer
    or employee may accept an offer to serve in other
    nonelective offices or positions of honor, trust,
    or profit, the officer or employee must obtain
    from the governing body, or if there is no govern-
    ing body, the executive head of the agency. division,
    department, or institution with which he ie aeeociated
    or employed, a finding that the requirements of Sec-
    tion 1 of this Act have been fulfilled. The govern-
    ing body or executive head shall make an official
    record of the finding and of the compensation to
    be received by the nonelective officer or employee
    from such additional nonelective office or position
    of~honor, truet, or profit including specifically
    salary, bonus, per diem or other type of compensa-
    tion.
    "Sec. 3.
    The governing body or executive head
    shall promulgate rulea and regulations necessary
    to
    carry out the purposes of thim Act.” (Pmpha8i.s
    added.)
    In regard8 to your firat question, it is settled that the
    municipal poaitionr therein set forth are offices of trust
    under the State of Texa8. Willi v. Potts, 
    377 S.W.2d 622
    (Tex.
    Sup. 1964); Attorney Qoner8l's Opinion No. U-842 (1971).
    This office hae previouely held in AttOMey  General's
    Opinien No. M-193 (1968) that the prohibitions contained in
    Section6 12, 33 and 40 of Article XVI must all be considered
    in light of the proviso that was added to Section 33 by means
    of the 1967 amendment to that section. That proviso specifically
    authorizes the holding, by a non-elective State officer or
    employee, of more than one office or position of honor, truet,
    or profit under the laws of thim State or of the United States,
    provided the other office is of benefit to the State of Texas
    or is required by law and there is no conflict with the original
    office.
    -4865-
    .   .   -
    Honorable Jimmy Morris. page 4   (M-997)
    We are in accord with the reasoning of Attorney General's
    Opinion No. M-193 (1968), and the authorities cited therein, and
    hold that the 1967 amendment to Section 33 of Article XVI, in
    addition to explicitly amending that Section, had the effect of
    impliedly amending Sections 12 and 40 of that Article, and that
    those Sections must. accordinglv.
    - -- be construed in consonance with
    that amendment, and Article 6252-9a enacted pursuant thereto.
    Moreover, it has long been established that Section 40 of
    Article XVI, prohibiting the holding by one person of more than
    one civil office of emolument
    "applies only to offices of emolument.
    anolument means a pecuniary profit, gain, or
    advantage; hence the same uerson mav hold two
    civil offices where no nay, compensation, or
    pecuniary gain attaches to one of them, provided
    they are not incompatible." 47 Tex. Jur.2d 41.
    Public Officers, Section 27. (Emphasis added.)
    That Section is, therefore, inapplicable to your inquiry.
    YOU are therefore advised that, in answer to your first
    question, one person may, at the same time, hold both the offices
    of Civil Service Commissioner and thatof 'memberof a Board of
    Equalization, provided the findings and other requirements of
    Section 2 of Article 6252-9a have been met.
    Your second question involves the legality of one's boldinq
    the offices of a city Civil Service Commissioner, which is non-
    salaried, and that of Assistant Postmaster, a salaried federal
    position.
    We are of the opinion that the blanket prohibition of
    Section 12 of Article XVI, forbidding the holder of a federal
    office of profit or trust from holding a State office is also not
    applicable to the,situation set forth in your second question,
    by virtue of the addition of the 1967 proviso to Section 33 of
    -4866-
    I.   .
    Honorable Jimmy Morris,   page 5    (M-997)
    Article XVI and the provisions of Article 6252-9a.
    Therefore, you are further advised that one person may, at
    the same time, hold both the office of Civil Service Conmissioner
    and the federal office of Assistant Postmaster, provided the
    findings and other requirements of Section 2 of Article 6252-98
    have been met.
    We are also of the opinion that none of the offices at
    issue in this opinion are incompatible, and that they fall within
    the legally acceptable standard, which has been stated as follows:
    Wffices   are incompatible where their duties
    are or may be inconsistent or (In) conflict, but
    not where their duties are wholly unrelated,  are in
    no manner inconsistent and are never in conflict,
    and where neither office is accountable or under the
    dominion of, or subordinate to, the other, or has
    any right or power to interfere with the other in
    the performance of any duty." 47 Tex.Jur.Zd 43,
    Public Officers, Section 20.
    SUMMARY
    (1) Pursuant to Sections 12, 33, and 40
    of Article XVI of the Constitution of Texas,
    one person may, at the same time, hold the
    offices of Civil Service Coanniesionerand
    member of the Board of Equalization of a town
    or city, provided he has complied with the
    requirements of Section 2 of Article 6252-9a,
    Vernon's Civil Statutes.
    (2) Pursuant to Sections 12, 33, and 40
    of Article XVI of the Constitution of Texas,
    one person may, at the same time, hold the office
    -4867-
    _.   .
    Honorable Jimmy Morris, page 6    W-997)
    of Civil Service Cosnniesionerand the office
    of Assistant Postmaster both in a town or
    city, provided he has complied with the re-
    quirements of Section 2 of Article 6252-98,
    Vernon's Civil Statutes.
    Ve    truly yours,
    H
    General of Texas
    Prepared by Austin C. Bray, Jr.
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    Fred E. Davis
    Lonny Zwiener
    Linward Shivers
    Lewis Jones
    SAM MCDANIEL
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -4868-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-997

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017