Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  • ,
    October 8, 1971
    Ronarable Preston Smith                Opinion No. M-971
    Governor of Texas
    State Capitol                          Re:   Effect of State’s nepotism
    Austin, Texas 78711                          law (Articles  432 and 435,
    V.P.C.) on employments by
    regional councils  of govern-
    Dear Werner    With:                         ment .
    Yout request     reads     in part   a8 folIowr:
    “The Governor, as the State’s        chief
    Zanning officer,      has the responsibility
    $ or “’administering    State financial     assis-
    tance to the verious        regirsael councils     of
    governments in Texas.          By stats  law, this
    office    also prerider     techmical assistance
    to these regional counc~ils as necessary.
    In thir regard, I am hereby requesting youi
    WEftten    OpiaiOm    CWcsrmimg a point e§ law
    which has recently       arisen    in one sf there
    Ngional     ceuucils.
    “Specifically,     what effect,  if any,
    does the State’s nepotism statute have in
    .regard to re ional ceuncils         of governments?
    If the nepot 4 am law is applicable,        are there
    points WI&h may ,be wwmerated as general
    uidelines      for ,regional councils   to follow
    f o insure
    .‘,       that they are not in violation?”
    Arttcle   433, Vernou’s        Penal Code, provides      in part:
    “No officer     of this State nor any
    officer    of aay district,      county, city, pre-
    cinct,    sclwaal district,     OF other municipal
    oubdlvision of this State, nor any officer
    er member of any State district,          county,
    ciQ-9    school   district   or  other  municipal
    board, or judge of any court, created by or
    -4746-
    Honorable         Preston   Smith,     page     2      (M-971)
    under authority        of any General 01 Special
    Law of this State,         nor any member of the
    Legislature,       shall appoint,     or vote for, or
    confirm the appointment           to any office,  posi-
    tion,    clerkship,     em loyment or duty, of any
    person related       with Pn the second degrees by
    affinity     or within the third degree by con-
    sanguinity      to the person so ap ointing       or
    so voting,      or to any other mtm1 er of any
    such board, the Legislature,            or court of which
    such     erson so a pointing        or voting may be
    a mea 1 er, when t Re salary,        fees, or compensa-
    tion of such appointee          is to be paid for, di-
    rectly    or indirectly,      out of or from public
    funds or fees of office           of any kind or char-
    acter whatsoever;         . . .‘I.
    Article   435,     Vernon’s       Penal   Code,   provides:
    “No officer    or other person included
    within then third preceding      article    shall
    a prove any account or draw or authorize
    t Re drawing of any warrant or order to pay
    any salary,     fee or compensation      of such
    ineligibl,e   officer   or parson,    kpowing him
    to be so ineligible.”
    It thus appears that Article      432 proNbits     any
    officer       any subdivision
    of                   of the State from appo.inting,
    votin    for or confirming     the appointment   to any office,
    posit f on, clerkship,     e loyment or duty, of any person
    related   within   the proh7 bitive   degree when the salary,
    fee or compensation      is to be paid for directly    or in-
    dkrectly    out of gr from public funds of any kind or char-
    acter.
    The regional     councils  of governmsnt,ars        created
    pursuant   to the provisions      of Article   lOlln,     Vernon’s Civil
    Statutes,   and are governed by,a.regional,planning             commission.,
    Section   4 of Article    1Ollm specific,ally     states,    .‘a re,gional
    pl;``t;ommissi~n         shall   be a polite1       subdivision     of’
    . It is therefore      our opinion that the provi-
    sions of A&iey432         and 435, Vernon’s Penal Code, are appli-
    cable to the smpioyees       of a regional    planning     commission.
    -4747 -
    .   ~.   ,, ,/’
    ,
    Ibnorabla   Preston         !%ith,   page J        (M-971)
    <
    Section         6 of   Article    
    lOllm, supra
    .   provides:
    “Sec.       (a) A Regional Planning Com-
    6.
    mission  is authorized   to apply for, contract
    for, receive   and expend for its purposes   any
    funds or grants from any participating     govarn-
    mental unit or from the State of Texas, federal
    government, or any other source.
    *l(b) The Commission shall have no p;;;r
    to levy any character     of tax whatever.
    participating    governmental   units may appro-
    priate    funds to the Commission for the cost
    and lxpenses required     in the performance   of
    its purp0sas.e
    Articles  432 and 43s do not       rohibit    the payment
    by a participating    govornmantal     unit o e a rant      payable
    to a regional  plrnniag    commission.      Thaso   rticlos     would,
    however, prohibit   the payment of any salary,         fee or corn--
    pensatian  to a parson    related  within the prohibitive
    degree by eithor   tho rogional    planning    cammission     or govom-
    mental unit.
    Tho wtim          laws of this State (Articles
    432   and 435, V.P.C.)       lro      licablo   to rogianal
    planning   caissions         and t7 3 ir amployeos.     These
    Articles   do not prohibit        payments of grants by
    governmental     units to a ro ional planning          corn-          .
    missicm,   but the       do rohi it       lyments to per-
    sems related                       %
    rit h in t ii a prohib  Ptive dograa af
    a salary,    foe or compoasation         whether suck pay-
    mont is made by a gevormmental            unit or the
    rogional   plannimg commission.
    Prepared    by John Reeves
    Assistant    Attorney Ganoral
    -474&
    .   .    -
    Honorablo   Proston   Smith,   pago 4       (Y-971)
    APPROVED:
    OPINIONCOMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor,  Chairman
    W. E. Allen,  Co-Chairman
    Malcolm Quick
    Sally' Phillips
    Dick Chote
    Harriet Burke
    SAMMCDANIEL
    Acting Staff Legal     Assistant
    ALFREDWALKER                                    I.‘.
    Executive Assistant
    NOLAWHITE
    First Assistant
    .
    -47499
    .
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-971

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017