Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  • .’
    Honorable Neal .E. Birmingham                   Opinion No.   M-959
    Criminal District Attorney
    Cass County Courthouse                          Re:   Whether H. B. 305 and S. B.
    P. 0. Box 555                                         240, 62nd Leg.,    R.S.,   1971,
    Linden, Texas 75563                                   conflict as to the filing of
    condemnation    cases in Cass
    Dear Mr.    Birmingham:                               County, and related questions.
    You request our opinion construing Senate Bill 240 and House Bill
    305, both enacted by the 62nd Legislature   at its Regular Session in 1971,
    wherein they relate to eminent domain proceedings     in Cass County.  Spe-
    cifically you ask,
    ‘1. . . with whom should a proceeding     in eminent
    domain be instituted,   who will appoint the special com-
    missioners,    receive their awards,   and, in the absence
    of an objection to such awards,   file judgment? ”
    You state that Cass      County has no county court at law.
    Our opinion is that a petition    in condemnation  should be filed with
    the Judge of the 5th Judicial District     Court of Cass County who has juris-
    diction over all further proceedings.      1
    Senate Bill 240 is the latest act of the Legislature   and will prevail
    over   House Bill 305 to the extent of any irreconcilable    conflict. 2 Ex parte
    1.       This opinion    does not cover the period of time between May 19, 1971,
    the effective   date of H. B. 305, and June 9, 1971, the effective date of
    S. B. 240.
    2.       H. B. 305 was passed by the House on April 29, 1971, and by the Senate
    on May 13, 1971.   S. B. 240 was finally passed by both the Senate and
    the House on May 31, 1971.
    -4696-
    c
    Honorable    Neal E.   Birmingham,     page 2              (M-959)
    De Jesus    De La 0, 
    227 S.W.2d 212
    (Tex. Grim.  1950); Attorney General’s
    Opinions    No. M-501 (1969) and No. V-990 (1950. ) To the extent the two
    Acts may     be reconciled both must stand.  Wright v. Broeter,   
    145 Tex. 142
    ,
    
    196 S.W. 2d
    82 (1946. )
    We know of no law in effect at the time of the enactment of Senate
    Bill 240 or House Bill 305 which granted to the county court of Cass County
    any special jurisdiction   in eminent domain cases.      Both of these Acts re-
    moved from that court differing jurisdiction      in eminent domain cases. Touse
    Bill 305 removed certain trial jurisdiction     and vested it in the 5th Judicial
    District Court.    Cass~ County is in this Judicial District and no other.    Art.
    199, v. c. s.   Any and all jurisdiction  relating to eminent domain which may
    have remained in the County Court after the enactment of House Bill 305 was
    wholly divested by Senate Bill 240 which was subsequently        enacted.  (See
    footnote 2. ) Section 1 of the latter Act reads,
    “The district courts of all counties in the State
    shall have jurisdiction    concurrent with the county courts
    at law in eminent domain cases.       The county courts shall
    have no jurisdiction    in eminent domain cases. ” (Emphasis
    added. )
    Further,    Article 1960, Vernon’s         Civil   Statutes,   as amended   by Sec.
    7 of Senate Bill   240 reads in part,
    ‘1. . . The county courts       shall have no jurisdiction
    in eminent domain cases. ”
    Section    2 of Senate Bill   240 reads,
    “In all counties in which there is no county court
    at law with jurisdiction   of eminent domain cases,     the
    party desiring to initiate condemnation     proceedings   shall
    file its petition with the district judge; and objections   to
    the award of the special commissioners       shall be filed in
    the district court. ” (Emphasis     added. )
    Our opinion is that a petition in condemnation   should be filed with the
    Judge of the 5th Judicial District,   and that he should appoint the special com-
    missioners,  receive their award and, in the absence of an objection thereto,
    enter judgment.
    -4697-
    I
    .’
    Honorable    Neal E.     Birmingham,    page 3        (M-959)
    SUMMARY
    In proceedings    in eminent domain in Cass County
    the petition in condemnation      should bd filed with the Judge
    of the 5th Judicial District,    and he should appoint the special
    commi$sioners,      receive their award and, in the absence of
    an objection thereto,    enter judgment.
    eneral     of Texas
    Prepared    by John T. Richards,       II and Ronald E.   Tigner,
    Assistant   Attorneys General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor,   Chairman
    W. E. Allen,  Co-Chairman
    Jerry Roberts
    Watson Arnold
    S. J. Aronson
    William  Travis
    SAM MCDANIEL
    Acting Staff Legal      Assistant
    ALFRED      WALKER
    Executive   Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -4698-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-959

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017