Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  • Honorable Robert S. Calvert            Opinion No. M- 948
    Comptroller of Public Accounts
    Austin, Texas                          Re:   Is special $1.00 fee
    assessed against each
    delinquent tax receipt
    by S.B. 414 applicable
    to 1971 receipts issued
    for the period beginning
    February 1, 1972, and
    Dear Sir:                                    ending June 30, 19727
    We have received your request for an official opinion,
    which reads as follows:
    "The collection of the 1971 State and County Ad
    Valorem Taxes listed on the 1971 tax rolls legal-
    ly begins on October 1, 1971. A current tax
    receipt is issued to the taxpayer if the tax is
    paid during the nine months period beginning
    October 1, 1971 and ending June 30, 1972. A penalty
    is lnvoked at February 1, 1972, on unpaid taxes.
    "On July 1, 1972, all unpaid 1971 Ad Valorem Taxes
    are listed on delinquent tax rolls and from that
    date forward, the current tax receipt Is no longer
    issued. In its place a redemption certificate is
    issued to cover delinquent tax payments on real
    property and Insolvent receipts In cases of delinquent
    payments on personal property.
    "Section 4 of Senate Bill No. 414, passed by the
    62nd Le islature, levies a special fee of one
    dollar 7 $1.00) on each delinquent tax receipt.
    Please advise me if this fee is applicable to
    current 1971 receipts issued during the five
    months period beginning February 1, 1972, and
    ending June 30, 1972."
    Senate Bill No. 414, enacted by the 62nd Legislature
    (amending Article 7100,V.C.S.) became effective ninety (90)
    -4639-
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 2      (M-948)
    days from date of adjournment, the effective day being August
    3% 1971. This Bill creates and establishes a Legislative
    Property Tax Committee for the general purpose of making
    Inquiry into the process of ad valorem taxation in Texas
    and provides a special fee of one ($1.00) dollar to be
    collected by each County Tax Assessor-Collector for each
    delinquent tax receipt, redemption certificate, judgment
    receipt, and certain other receipts issued for taxes paid,
    in addition to the fees otherwise provided by law for such
    services, which are to be remitted to the Comptroller and
    by such officer deposited in the State Treasury as a
    special fund for the use of the aforesaid Property Tax
    Committee.
    Section 4 of Senate Bill No. 414, In its pertinent
    portion, reads as follows:
    "In addition to the fees authorized by Article
    73311 Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, as
    amended
    _-    each County Tax Assessor-Collector shall
    collect and remit to the Comptroller, as directed,
    a special fee of One Dollar ($1) for each delinquent
    tax receipt, redemption certificate, judgment
    receipt, or any of them, processed by the County
    Tax Office, and also for each receipt issued for
    taxes paid under provisions of Articles 7207, 7208,
    7209 and 7346 through 7349, inclusive, of the Revised
    Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, or any of them, the
    proceeds of this additional fee to be deposited
    in the State Treasury as a special fund for the
    use of the Property Tax Committee herein created.
    11
    ..."
    Where there Is nothing to indicate that the legislature
    did not Intend exactly what it said, its language is to be
    literally construed. Trimer v. Carlton, 
    264 S.W. 253
    ,
    (Tex.Civ.App.1924) aff. 116 Tex.572, 
    296 S.W. 1070
    ; Lincoln
    Nat'1 Life Ins. Co. v. Freudenstein, 
    87 S.W.2d 810
    (Tex.Clv.
    App. 1935 no writ); EirazosRiver Authority v. City of Graham,
    
    163 Tex. 169
    , 
    354 S.W.2d 99
    (1962).
    It is apparent from the material furnished with your
    request that the prevailing practice of Tax Assessors and
    Collectors of our State is to issue receipts on the same form
    for all payments of ad valorem taxes made from October 1 of
    -4640-
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 3     (M-948)
    the taxable year to June 30th, both Inclusive, of the next
    following calendar year. These receipts are distinguished
    only by the inclusion of penalty and interest on those
    receipts (excepting split-payments) issued for payments
    made on and after February 1st and until July 1st of the
    following calendar year. These, including those Issued for
    the so-called split-payments, are called "current receipts"
    by these officers, although the printed forms are merely
    labelled "State and County Tax Receipt" for the taxable
    year involved. The other receipts furnished by the Comptroller
    for use by the Assessor-Collectors are denominated "Certificate
    of Redemption", "Judgment Receipt", "Insolvent Receipt",
    and "Supplemental State and County Tax Receipt". From all
    we have been able to ascertain there is no receipt now used
    by such Assessors and Collectors that is labelled or denominated
    "delinquent tax receipt", as such. As we find it, the
    yoregoing enumerated receipts or certificates are all that
    are issued for the respective tax payments.
    The well established custom of these officers to recognize
    the date of July 1st of the year succeeding the taxable year as
    the beginning of all ad valorem tax delinquencies doubtless
    came into being because such date was, and has been since 1931,
    the time the Assessor and Collector of Taxes was required by
    law to begin his list of lands and lots and/or property on
    which any taxes for the preceding year were delinquent (Art.
    7336, v.c.s.). Apparently this caused many of these officers
    to form a firm conviction that payments made before July 1
    immediately following the taxable year were "current" and not
    delinquent, although the delinouency date for any taxable
    year has been since 1897 specified by statute as February first
    of the next succeeding year. This has been the determining
    date ever since, with the exception of the 1935-1939 Depression
    years during which the date of delinquency determination was
    made to coincide with the beginning of the delinquent tax roll
    (July 1st). In construing the 1897 tax laws, the Court in
    Clark et al vs. Elmendorf, 
    78 S.W. 539
    (Tex.Civ.App., 1904, error
    ref.) held that the taxes involved were delinquent on February
    first of each year, and the provision as to the collector making
    a list of delinquent taxes has no reference whatever to the time
    when the taxes became delinquent.
    In 1939 the delinquency date of February first was restored
    by an amendment to Article 7336, and the pertinent portion of
    this Article now reads as follows:
    -4641-
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 4      (M-948)
    11
    .   .   .
    "(b) All poll taxes and all ad valorem taxes, un-
    less one-half I
    (l/2) thereof have been paid on or
    before November thirtieth as hereinabove provided,
    shall become delinquent if not paid prior to
    February first of the year next succeeding the year
    for which the return of the assessment rolls of
    the county are made to the Comptroller of Public
    Accounts. If one-half (l/2) of said ad valorem
    taxes have been paid on or before the thirtieth
    day of November as herein provided, the remaining
    one-half (l/2) of such taxes shall be delinquent if
    not paid before the first day of July of the year
    next succeeding the year for which the return of
    the assessment rolls of the county are made to the
    Comptroller of Public Accounts.
    II
    ...t, (Emphasis added).
    Thus, it is clearly apparent that the delinquency date for
    single-payment taxes is February 1st; for split-payments it is
    July 1st.~ Forest Park Lanes Ltd. v. Keith,-441 S.W.2d 920
    (Tex.Civ.App.,chfleld                             Company v.
    Warren' Independent School District,lC53 S.W.2d 190 (Tex.Civ.
    APP., 1970, writ ref., n.r.e.).
    Under the system now prevailing, the assessor-collector
    issues to one paying his taxes between January 31 and July 1,
    a general tax receipt for such taxes due, plus penalty and
    interest. This is all the statutes require of him and we
    foresee no necessity for a change of such procedure other than
    the assessment and collection of the $1.00 special fee provided
    by Senate Bill No. 414. Such officer% specification of the
    character of the receipt Issued in such case in of no import
    - - under Senate Bill No. 414 it Is a receipt for payment of
    delinquent taxes.
    Hence, it Is the opinion of this office that your question
    should be answered In the affirmative.
    We note that some of the letters received in regard to
    this question mention a feared hardship on the taxpayers In
    those counties using data processing whereby each piece of
    property is listed separately, in that multiple receipts in
    many cases will encourage such taxpayers to wait until July 1,
    so as to be charged for only one receipt listing all of his
    -4642 -
    Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 5         (M-948)
    properties. We see no insurmountable difficulty in reconciling
    such "data processing" methods to the methods prescribed for
    the execution of such duties by the Comptroller under Article
    7210, Vernon's Civil Statutes.
    SUMMARY
    The $1.00 6 ecial fee levied by Section 4 of
    Senate Bill No. fi
    14, Acts 62nd Legislature, R.S.,
    1971, Chapter 221, page 1063, amending Article
    7100, V.C.S., on each delinquent tax receipt is
    applicable to 1971 single-payment tax receipts
    issued for the period beginning February 1, 1972,
    and ending June 30, 1972.
    The Comptroller under authority of Article
    7210, V.C.S., may prescribe methods of reconciling
    inequities between "data processing" counties and
    counties using single receipt forms for multiple
    property listing.
    Y    very ply,
    Prepared by Robert L. Lattlmore
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    James Broadhurst
    Jack Goodman
    Sam Jones
    John Banks
    SAM MCDANIEL
    Acting Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WRITE
    First Assistant                -4643-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-948

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017