Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  • Honorable Robert E. Stewart        Opinion No. M-915
    Commiesloner
    State Banking Department
    John Ii.Reagan Building
    Austin, Texas                      Re: Branch Banking; Machines
    for the purpose of perform-
    ing services (obtaining
    Dear Hr. Stewart:                      cash) by automation.
    You have requested an opinion from this office which
    reads as follows:
    II        -4
    A Corporation, manufacturer of automated
    bank teller equipment, has submitted to this offlce 2
    the description and proposed use of a machine
    It Is referred to by the manufacturer as 'the auto-
    mation of tradltlonal~services performed by bank
    tellersI. A full memorandum and ~exhlblts are attached
    describing &he procedures resulting In (1)~wlthdrawals
    from         on the premises of the Issuing Bank and
    In (2>mdrawals     not made at the Issuing Bank.
    "Please advise us whether ln the proposed trans-
    actions both.on and away from'the drawee bank premises
    the bank Is e'waglng lwbusln&s     In moi%tban one
    place or iwcashlng checks outside Its noun banking
    house, *contrary .to the provisions of Article 16, Sec-
    tlon-~16-.ofthe Texas Constitution or'ArtXcle 342-903,
    Vernon'& Texas Civil Statutes.“.
    Article XVI, Section ,16 of the Constitution of Texas
    reads as follows:
    1-2   The name of the manufacturer, and the trade name of the
    machine are omitted throughout as shown by blank spaces
    where the context Indicates.
    -4460-
    Honorable Robert E. Stewart, page 2          (M-915)
    "The Legislature shall by general laws, authorize
    the Incorporation of corporate bodies with banking
    and discounting privileges, and shall provide for a
    system of State supervision, regulation and control
    of such bodies which will adequately protect and
    secure the depositors and creditors thereof.
    "No such corporate body shall be chartered until
    all of the authorized capital stock has been sub-
    scribed and paid for In full In cash. Such body
    corporate shall not be authorized to engage In
    business at more than one place which shall be des-
    ignated In its charter.
    "NO foreign corporation, other than the national
    banks of the United States, shall be permitted to
    exercise banking or dlscountln privileges In thls
    State. As amended Nov. 8, igOt; Aug. 23, 1937."
    A title 342-903, Vernon's Civil Statutes, as last
    amended,5 reads in part as follows:
    "NO State, national or private bank shall engage
    in business in more than one place, maintain any
    branch office, or cash checks or receive deposits ex-
    cept In Its own banking house. For purposes of this
    article 'banking house' means the building In whose
    offices the business of the bank Is conducted and
    which is functionally one place of business, Including
    (a) office facilities whose nearest wall Is located
    within five hundred (500) feet of the nearest wall
    of the central building and Is physically connected
    to the central building by tunnel, passageway or
    hallway providing direct access between the central
    building and the connected office facility or b
    pneumatic tube or other similar carrier, and (b3 In
    addition, In a county having a population of at
    least 350,000 according to the last preceding federal
    census, If authorized in the manner hereinafter
    provided, not more than one (1) automobile drive-in
    facility whose nearest boundary Is located within
    one thousand eight hundred fifty (1,850) feet of the
    1971, ch. 358,   P. 1352,
    -4461-
    Honorable Robert E. Stewart, page 3          (M-915)
    nearest wall of the central building but more than
    five hundred (500) feet therefrom and is connected
    to the central building by tunnel, passageway or
    hallway providing direct access between the central
    building and the connected automobile drive-in
    faclllty or by pneumatic tube or other similar
    carrier. The entire banking house shall for all
    purposes under the law be considered one Integral
    banking house. The term 'automobile drive-in facility'
    as herein used shall mean a facility offering banking
    services solely to persons who arrive at such facility
    In an automobile and remain therein during the trans-
    action of business with the bank. . . ."
    From the Information which has been furnished with your
    request for an opinion, It Is reflected that the automated ma-
    chines will be Installed and operated only on the premises where
    the bank which makes the machine available Is authorized under
    Its charter to engage In the banking business.
    It is set out In the documents furnished us with your
    opinion request that the machines will be operated and used
    as follows in dispensing cash to customers of each participating
    bank.
    "A bank wouid enter Into agreements with other
    -banks whereby each of the banks would encode the
    bank identification cards of certain customers to 4
    enable such customers to obtain cash from a
    Installed on the premises of each of the par-t-
    lng banks. Each bank issuing ldentlflcatlon cards
    (the VIssulng Bank') would also enter into agree-
    ments with its customers providing that after money
    was dispensed to a customer the following would
    occur:
    "1, If the withdrawal was made from the         5
    on the premises of the Issuing Bank, the withdrawal:
    would be treated as any other checking account wlth-
    drawal by the customer by an appropriate debit to
    the customer's accou?t; or
    4-5    See Footnote 
    2, supra
    .
    -4462-
    Honorable     Robert E. Stewart, page 4          W-915)
    "2. If the withdrawal was not made at the Is-
    suing Bank, (k%)the transaction would be tre~ated
    as the cashing of a check drawn on the Issuing Bank,
    (b) the bank at which cash had been dispensed (the
    'Dispensing Bank'.)would tranemgt the transaction
    slip prepared by the              through normal
    clearing channels to fhe Issuing Rank, (c) the
    Issuing Bank would debit the customer's account
    for the amount of money dispensed If .a sufficient
    balance was available, Andy (d) If the customer's
    checking account at the Issuing Bank contained ln-
    sufficient funds, the Issuing  Bank would return
    the transaction slip to the Dispensing Bank unpaid
    and the Dispensing-Bank would have to seek collec-
    tion from the customer.
    "In either case, the cash withdrawal Is the
    essential equivalent of cashing a check, drawn on
    the Issuing Bank, at either the Issuing Bank or a
    Dispensing Rank.
    "If the participating banks are members of a
    bank credit card association such as Master Charge
    or BankAmerlcard, the customer could be permitted
    to elect to have his withdrawal either 'credited'
    (sic) against his checking account at the Issuing
    Bank or treated as a cash advance under the rules
    of such credit card programs."
    It therefore appears from the facts submitted, that the
    use and operation of an automated machine in the manner above
    set out would be In conformity with normal banking  operations,
    (such aspa bank teller would perform In cashing a check) and
    the use of such automated .machines on the premises of partici-
    pating banks would not be In violation of Article XVI Section
    16 of the Constitution of 
    Texas, supra
    , and Article  
    34%903, supra
    .
    SUHHARY
    The use of automated machines In dispensing
    cash, on the premises of a banking house, under
    b           See Footnote 
    2, supra
    .
    -4463-
    Honorable Robert E. Stewart, page 5          (M-915)
    the facts submitted, would not violate Article
    XVI, Section 16 of the Constitution of Texas or
    Article 342-903, Vernon's Civil Ststutes.
    YoursZery   truly,
    Prepared by John H. Banks
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    2. T. Fortescue
    Dyer Moore
    Jim Swearlngen
    Jack Goodman
    MEADE F. GRIFFIN
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -4464-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-915

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017