Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  • Honorable George K. Smith      Opinion No. M-892
    County Auditor
    Records Building               Re:   Whether proceeds from the
    Dallas, Texas 75202                  sale of bonds issued by
    Dallas County for road
    improvements may be commin-
    gled with other monies
    under authority of Article
    VIII, Section 9, Texas
    Dear Mr. Smith:                      Constitution.
    You ask whether your county‘can transfer certain funds
    to the counties consolidated "General Fund" from a "Capital
    Improvement Fund" made up of proceeds from the sale of a
    certain issue of tax supported road bonds.
    Article VIII, Section 9, Texas Constitution, as amended
    in 1967, reads, in part:
    I!
    . . . Any county may put all tax
    money collected by the county into one
    general fund, without regard to the purpose
    or source of each tax . . .v (Emphasis
    added)
    This language of the Constitution Is clear that the
    "General Fund" is to be made up of funds raised by taxation
    and not proceeds from the sale of bonds.
    Our prior Opinion NO. ~-207 (1968)   reads, in part:
    The 1967 amendment to Section
    9 besiowing power upon any county to put
    all its tax money into one fund does not
    require that this be done, but instead
    confers the power subject to the good judg-
    ment of the Commissioners Court, so long
    as it does not impair outstanding bonds
    or,obligations. Limited exercis? of
    conferred power, as under the facts here,
    4347
    Honorable George K. Smith, page 2                    (M-892)
    is well recognized by our Courts. cf.
    State v. City of Austin, 
    160 Tex. 348
    ,
    s w 2d 737   143 (1960). " (Emphasis
    edj..       ’
    It is also elementary that the proceeds from the sale
    of county bonds can only be used for the purpose authorized
    and may not be diverted to other purposes or uses. Barrington
    v. Cokinas, 
    161 Tex. 136
    , 
    338 S.W.2d 133
    (1960).
    In view of the constitutional limitation on monies ell-
    gible for deposit in the General Fund, as well as the restric-
    tions on the use of bond proceeds, we find no merit in the
    proposition that bond proceeds or a portion thereof are subject
    to deposit in such fund pending their expenditure.
    SUMMARY
    Section 9 of Article VIII Texas
    Constitution, as amended in 1967 allows
    a county to deposit all tax money col-
    lected by the county in one general fund,
    without regard to the purpose or source
    of each tax, but does not permit the
    deposit of bond proceeds in the general
    fund.
    Prepared by Robert B. Davis
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    John Reeves
    Austin~Bray
    Jack Goodman
    Fisher Tyler
    4348
    ,                ,-   .-
    ,   t   ,.   ~
    Honorable George K. Smith, page‘3   (M-892)
    MEADE F. GRIFFIN
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    4349
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-892

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017