-
. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Hon. John A. Menefee opitiion’ NO. M-870 County Attorney Upton County Courthouse Re: Liability of a county for Rankiti,Texas 79778 a medical bill of an in- digent~prlsonerwhose residence is located in the county of his lncar- ceration and in the local county hospital district-, but who was treated out- side the county and in Dear Mr. Menefee: another hospital district. Your recent letter requesting the opinion of this office concerning the referencedmatter states, in part, as follows: *I herewith request an opinion as to the liability of Upton County for the medical bill and expenses'ofan indigent prison& whose resi- dence is in a hospital district in Upton County created under the provision of House Bill Number 816,60th Legislature,Re lar Session (Vernon's Ann.CXv.St. Article b&g&&Y in accordancewith Article 9, Section 9 of the Con,stitutionof,the State of Texas. This indigent'prlsoner~ was treated and cared for In a hospital not located In Upton County, Texas. "The facts and background of the matter are as follows:. . . "Now in view of the foregoing,please answer the following questions: "1. Is Upton County~llablefor the bill for medical treatment and hospital care of the Indigent prisoner, Francis William Dalgleish? "In the event the answer to the foregoing Is yes, please answer this question: -4239- Hon. John A. Menefee, page 2 (M-870) n2. Can the County place in Its budget an item 'for medical care and hospltallzatlonof slck,prlsonersin county Jails' and levy a tax therefor? “3. In the event the answer to the question number one (1) is no, does the liability for the 'medicalbill lie with the McCamey County Hospital District?" Your letter relates that the area of Upton County I: coextensive with the area of two hospital districts, the McCar County Hospital District and the Rankin County Hospital Dlstr: each of these districts comprise a portion of Upton County. Your letter, also, in regards to the factual sltuat states that the indigent prisoner was taken by the Sheriff of Upton County, who had him in his custody, to a doctor for an examination,and that 4, .*. . the doctor informed the sheriff that the prisoner was suffering from a blockage of the kidneys and that if he was not immediatelyremoved to a hospital having proper facilities, this man would moat likely die in his cell. The doctor informed the sheriff that the Rankin County Hospital District did not have the facilities and would not admit him or accept hlm as a patient. In the meantime. . .(t)he sheriff . then called (another)doctor. . . and he was Informed that the McCamey County Hospital Dis- trict did not have the facilitiesin the hospital to treat this patient and that he would not be able to admit him because of the lack of facilities there for the proper treatment. Whereupon, the sheriff made inquiries and was Lnformed that the Ode&a Medical Center Hospital In Odessa, Texas (located in Eotor County) had the facilitiesand would accept him. The sheriff of Upton County secured an order from the County Judge of Upton County to transfer the prisoner to the Odessa Medical Center Hospital in Odessa.' You further state that the medical bill Incurred indigent prlisonerat the Odessa hospital was approximately -4240- Hon. John A..Menefee,page 3 (M-870) At the time of his arrest, the Indigentprisoner was a resident of McCamey in Upton County, and of the McCamey County Hospital Mstrict. When arrested, he was taken to the Upton County Jail, located in Rankin, Texas, and within the Rankin County Hos- pital District. His illness was contractedwhile incarceratedin the County Jail. Section 9 of Article IX of the Constitutionof Texas, as enacted‘in1962, provides, in part, that: "The Legislaturemay by law provide for the creation, establishment,maintenanceand operation of hospital districts. . ., providing that any district so created shall assume full responsibility for providing medical and hospital care for its needy Inhabitants. . .; providing that after its creation no:other'munic~pallt P litI 1 b aivision shall have the powerYt?lety taxe3 s" ' '~a or Issue bonds or other obllgatlonsfor hospital pur- posesor for providing medical care within the boundaries of the district; . ;"' (Emphasisadded.) Your letter states that the indigent prisoner was a resident of the McCamey County Hospital District. This District was created by Acts 60th Legislature,Re lar Session, 1967, Chapter 183,Page 384 (which Is Article &"494s note, Vernon's Civil Statutes). The Act creating the Hospital District provzdes, in '. part, as follows: (Emphasisadded.) ',provides Article 1037, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure that: "Each county shall be liable for all expense Incurred on account of prisoners confined in jail k t d d t prlscners brought ~ome~no``e~c``~y'f~rxc``fe keeping, or on -4241- Hon. John A. Menefee, page 4 (M-870) habeas corpus or change of venue; In which cases the county from which the prisoner is brought shall be liable for the expense of his safe keeping." (Emphasisadded.) Article 1040, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,provides, In part, that: "For the safe keeping, support and maln- tenance of prisoners confined in Jail or under guard, the sheriff shall be allowed the following charges: 'I . . . "3. For necessarymedical bill and reason- able extra cosipansatlon for attention to a The foregoingArt&es 1037 and 1040 are found in Chapter 104 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,whioh Chapter Is styled "Costs Paid by Counties." Several prior Opinions of this Office have held that a. county Is liable for the necessaryand reasonable medical expenses lncurred:bya prisoner during sickness, and that the proper amount of'the charges for such medical treatment'lsto be determinedby the commissioners'courtand paid by the county. Attorney General's Opinions Nos. c-538 (lg65), ww-1509 (19%;; i%j4 (19%. and O-4708 (1942). None of these or any other Opinion of this Offlc! or any decision of any appellate court of this State of which we are aware, has consideredthe liability of.a county for Its indigent rlsoners where a hospital district comprising ~thewhole or a part !&-tTi- e county and having the powers under consideration,exists. Attorney General's Opinion No. M-171 (1967) held that a hospital district, created pursuant to Section 9 of Article IX of the Constitutionof Texas,
quoted supra, has the full responslbilltY for providingmedical and hospital care for indigent residentsof such district and that, when the hospital district cannot adequately 1 barge its responslbilltyto such Indigent inhabitantbecause of a i:ck of sufficienthospital facllltles, it may send the indigent -4242- Hen, John A. Menefee, page 5 : (M-870) to-a hospital outside the district -andlegally pay for such.out- of-districtexpenses. Attorney General's Opinion No, C-334 (1964) held that a hospital district oreated pursuant to the foregoing constitu- tional provision assumes the responsibilityfor medical care of Indigentswithin Its district that'was theretoforeimposed on the county commissionerscourt pursuant to Articles 2351 and 4438, Vernon's Civil Statutes. Attorney General's Opinion No, c-646 (1966) held that Section 9 of Article II of the Constitutionof Texas does not permit a county in which a hospital district Is created pursuant thereto to expend tax monies for med.loaland hospital services. We are of the opinion that, under the circumstancesset forth in your letter, the prov@$ons of Articles 1037 and 1040 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure, supra, relating to the llabllltyof a county for medical bills of prisoners,must yield to the express broad Zanguage of Section 9 of Article IX of the ' Constitutionof Texas which is undersoored,supra, and to the underscoredlangua e of the Act oreatlng the McCamey County Hospital District 7Article 4494q,,note,Vernon's Civil Statutes, mpra). The language covers lndlgents and needy Inhabitants, whether or not they are prlsoneys. While a county may, by statute,be given authority In certain areas, this authority may, by constitutionalprovision, be delegatedto another entity. See Attorney General's Opinion NO. c-334
(1964), supra. Accordingly,you are advised that, under the particular circumstancesset forth in your letter, the McCamey County Hospital District,the district of the residence of the indigent prisoner, 1s liable for the medical bills incurred in his treatment, not- withstandingthe fact that he was a prisoner In the custody of the county sheriff, and further notwithstandingthe fact that he was treated outside the boundaries of that Hospital District. AttorneyGeneral's Opinion No. M+171
(1967), supra. As your first question has been answered in the negative, we do not deem It necessary to consider your second question. Your third question 1s answered in the'affirmatlve. -4243- Hon.'John A. Menefee, page 6 t ,,.-' : (M-870) SUMMARY:. Under the facts presented, and pursuant to Section 9 of Article IX-of the Constitutionof Texas, the hospital dlstrlct.of'whlchan indigent prisoner held by the Sheriff of the county is's resident Is liable for the medical bills Incurred In treating the prisoner,when that hospital dls- trlct did not have adequate facilities for treat- ing him, and the treatment had to be administered In a hospital without the boundaraes of the hospital 'district. Under the facts presented, the provisions of Articles 1037 and 1040 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedurerelating"to ccunty responsibilityfor the med~cal~bllisof prisonersmust yield to the broad .~language of the foregoing constitutionalprovision, and of the.Act creating the.hospitaldistrict (Article 449&q note, .Vernoti's~Ci.vil Statutes) that was enacted .pursuantto 'suchconstltutlonalprovision. 'Its language IS comprehensiveenough to -include;.all needy and indigent-Inhabitantressdents,whether. . '. 'or not they are prisoners.. n . . neral of Texas Prepared'by~ Austin C. Bray, Jr. Asslstant.AttorneyGeneral. APPROVED:. -. OPINION COMMITTKR .' Kerns Taylor, ChaIrman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman Jim Swearlngen John Hanks Fisher Tyler .,. Sam McDaniel -4244- Hon. John A. Menefee; p+ge,,7~ MEXDE F. GRIFFIN StaPf Legal Assistant ALFFBDWALm Executive Assistant NOLA WIiI!I'E First Assistant -4245-
Document Info
Docket Number: M-870
Judges: Crawford Martin
Filed Date: 7/2/1971
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017