Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  • Honorable   Robert F. Atkins                     Opinion   No.    M-799
    County Attorney
    San Jacinto County Courthouse                    Re:       Authority of a County      to
    Coldspring,   Texas 77331                                  lease its property.
    Dear   Mr.    Atkins:
    Your recent letter       requesting      an opinion   from   this office   poses
    the following question:
    “Whether  the Commissioners’    Court of
    San Jacinto County can lease to private individuals
    a portion of the old State Highways and Farm-to-
    Market Roads that have been turned back to the
    County? ”
    A general       statement  of law applicable to powers          of the Com-
    missioners’   Court      is set out in the following statement:             .
    “Although     the commissioners’      court,   as
    the a,cting governing     body of the county, has juris-
    diction touching in some respect almost every
    feature,of   the county’s business,      its power extends
    only to such business      of the county as is entrusted
    to it by the constitution    or statute.    In other words,
    the jurisdiction    of the commissioners’       court over
    the county business      is not general and all-inclusive,
    but is limited to matters      or Rowers specifically
    covered by the constitution      and statutes.      The court
    does not have general police powers.          %foreover,     it
    must conform to the statutory mode prescribed             for
    the~exercise     of its powers.”    15 Tex. Jur. 2d 261-2.
    Counties,    Section 35, and cases there cited. (Em-
    phasis added. )
    -3877-
    Honorable         Robert F. Atkinr,                page 2                  (M-799)
    Article             2351,      ’ in part,   provides      that:
    1
    “Each              commissioners’           court     shall:
    “3.                Lay out and establish,            change and dis-
    continue public roads            and highways.
    ‘1. . .
    “6.                Exercise      general    control over          all roads,
    highways,      ferries    and bridges          in their
    counties.
    I,
    .   .
    “15.               Said court shall have all such other powers
    and jurisdiction,    and shall perform all such
    other duties,    as are now or may hereafter
    be prescribed     by law. ” (Emphasis  added. )
    While              Article      1577 deals      with the sale of real          estate   by the
    county, there is no language therein that either expressly      or neces-
    sarily implies that a county may lease its own property for any pur-
    pose.   Since its amendment    in 1953 (Acts 53rd Leg.,    R. S. , Ch. 133,
    p. 447), Article   1577 has constituted the general authority of a county
    to sell or dispose of real estate, with no provision    therein contained for
    leasing land.    We find no cases of any appellate court having construed
    this Article with reference   to the power of a county to lease land.
    We do find several   statutes authorizing a county,                                  or certain
    counties,  to make a lease of county owned land for certain                                    purposes
    and under specified  conditions:
    (1)            an airport,   Articles  2351,   subdivision  18(a) and Article
    1269h,   subdivision   D (Attorney   General Opinion No.
    M-758 (1970) so holding);
    1               All       references         to Articles       are to Vernon’s       Civil    Statutes.
    -3878-
    Honorable     Robert    F. Atkins,    page   3            (M-799)
    (2)     county hospital:    Articles   4494a, 4494b.   4494~.  4494d,
    4494e. 4494f,    4494g.   4494h,   4494j. 4494k.’ 44941. and
    4494m.
    This office has consistently    held since February      17, 1948, that
    there is no general authority conferred       by the Constitution    or statutes
    authorizing the Commissioners’        Court to lease its property.       Attorney
    General Opinions Nos. R-1073       (1948);   V-1085 (1950); V-1457      (1952);
    and C-678 (1966).    In view of the foregoing,      it will be presumed     that the
    Legislature   has had knowledge of this departmental         construction,    and
    having met numerous     times without amending the statutes to provide
    authority for counties to lease property,       it has acquiesced    in that con-
    struction and did not desire to grant general authority to counties to
    lease property.   Likewise,   it is settled that the courts will ordinarily
    adopt and uphold the statutory    construction  of the Attorney   General if
    such is deemed reasonable.       53 Tex. Jur. 2d 262-263,    Statutes,  177.
    further stating:
    “In     particular,    an opinion or ruling of the
    Attorney       General    is highly persuasive    and will be
    carefully      considered     and followed in case of doubt
    as to the      proper construction      to be given a statute.        ”
    We hold, therefore,   that in the absence pf a statut’e conferring
    upon the county the authority to lease its property,      such authority does
    not exist.  Consequently,    even assuming   that title to the abandoned high-
    way property is in the county,    the Commissioners’      Court of San Jacinto
    County is without authority to lease it or any portion thereof.
    SUMMARY
    There is no existing general statutory authority
    authorizing  a county to lease its property for any pur-
    pose, and before any county may lease its property,         the
    Legislature  would have to enact appropriate    legislation
    empowering    counties to lease their property.
    Very*y          yours,
    Attorney        eneral   of Texas
    LY
    -3879-
    .   ,.   .
    Honorable      Robert F. Atkinr,   page 4      (M-799)
    Prepared      by Edward B. Rather
    Assistant     Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns     Taylor,  Chairman
    W. E.     Allen, Co-Chairman
    MerriIl      Finnell
    Arthur      Sandlin        -
    Bob Lattimore
    Max Hamilton
    MEADE F. GRIFFIN
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED        WALKER
    Executive      Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -3880-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-799

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017