-
. Hon. Hugh C. Yantis, Jr. Opinion No. M-810 Executive Director Texas Water Quality Board Re: Authority of Texas Water 1108 Lavaca Street Quality Board to require Austin, Texas 70701 owners or operators of solid waste disposal sites to post bona to insure proper closing of Dear Mr. Yantis: sit&. In your request for an official,opinion of this office you state: II...It would appear to me that requiring the owners: or~operators of industrial solid waste disposal sites to be bonded by a surety company would be a desir- able way of insuring financial,responsi- bility when it becomes necessary to close a conunercial-industrial solid waste disposal site. Since the solid Waste Act does'not specifically author- ize the Water Qualit)+ Boar&to requke a surety bona. as a &ondition precedent .to licensings &n:.industrial solid waste 'site, .I hereby requests an Attorney General's opinion asto whether or not the.Water Quality Board.can requires such a bona at; the present time." Basically, there is but one rule for construction of statutes, and thakis that the legislative intent must govern. All other canons of,iriterpretation, so called, are but grounds of argument resorted to for the purpose of ascertaining the true meaning of the law. Mills County v. Lampasas County,
90 Tex. 603,
40 S.W. 403(1897); Imperial Irrigation Co. v. Jayne,
104 Tex. 395,
138 S.W. 575(1911). -3934- ’ Hon. Hugh C. Yantis, Jr., page 2 (M-810) State Boards and Agencies can exercise only such author- ity as is conferred on them by the law of the State of Texas .- -. - - or necessarily implied from a specific grant of authority. Ft. Worth Cavalry Club v. Sheppard,
125 Tex. 339, 83 S.w.Zd 660 (1935); Tri-City Fresh Water Supply District No. 2 v. Mz,
135 Tex. 280,
142 S.W.2d 945(1940). "A delegation of power, when permitted, must be expressed by clear and express terms or by clear implication. An ad- ministrative agency has only such author- ity, especially with respect to the regu- lation and control of private rights and properties, as is clearly delegated or necessarily implied from that expressly delegated. And when a statute delegating a power directs the manner of its exer- cise, that method is exclusive of all others." 53 Tex.Jur.2d 68, Statutes g36. We further find that the statutory grant of an express power carries with it, by implication, every incidental power that is necessary and proper to the execution of the power expressly granted. "But interpretation by implication is per- missible only when it is necessary. Re- sort may not be had to implications if the statute is explicit to the pointin ques- tion. Nor is it permissible to resort to implication in order to arrive at an inten- tion other than that which the statute rea- sonably reflects. Again, nothing is to be implied that is inconsistent with express provisions..." 53 Tex.Jur.2d 204, Statutes Ei141. The Solid Waste Disposal Act, codified as Article 4477-7, Vernon's Civil Statutes, does not specifically authorize the Texas Water Quality Board to require a surety bona as a con- dition precedent to licensing an owner or operator of a solid waste disposal site. -3935- Hon. Hugh C. Yantis, Jr., page 3 (M-810) Under the foregoing rules of statutory construction, we do not believe that the Legislature intended to author- ize the Texas Water Quality Board to require a bond under the Solid Waste Disposal Act to insure proper closing of a site when its use has been completed. Because the Act does not contain express provisions allowing such a bond to be required, is silent on the question of financial respon- sibility, and does not contain any other provision from which the authority of the Board to require such a bond can be reasonably implied, we hold that the Board does not have such authority. Your second question need not be answered since 'a bond may not be required under the present law. SUMMARY ----__- Under the provisions of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, Article 4477-7, V.C.S., The Texas Water Quality Board has no authority to require a surety bond as a condition precedent to issuing a li- cense to the owner or operator of a solid waste disposal site. Respectfully submitted, CRAWFORD C. MARTIN Attorney General of Texas by: First Assistant Prepared by Roland H. Allen Assistant Attorney General -3936- Hon. Hugh C. Yantis, Jr., page 4 (M-810) APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman w. E. Allen, Co-Chairman John Reeves Bob Lemeris John Banks Rex H. White MEADE F. GRIFFIN Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant -3931-
Document Info
Docket Number: M-810
Judges: Crawford Martin
Filed Date: 7/2/1971
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017