Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  •                        February 18, 1971
    Honorable Enrique H. Pena
    County Attorney
    Room 201;~City-County Building
    El,Paso, Texas 79901          Opinion No. M-794
    Re:   Fees for hearings before
    a Justice of the Peaoe
    for revocation of driver'8
    liaense pursuant to
    Article 6687b, Section 22,
    Dear Mr. Penar                     Vernon's Civil Statutes.
    In your request for our opinion you ask what fees, if
    are payable to a Justice of the Peaae for conducting
    i%ings   on the revocation of driver's license under Arti-
    cle 6687b, Section 22, Vernon's Civil Statutes,
    II
    . . . the anewer sought is not whether
    the Department of Pub1i.cSafety is author-
    ized to pay, but rather whether s   agency,
    political subdivision,~or person, is obligated
    to pay a fee to a Justice of the Peace hear-
    ing these cases. And if the Justice of the
    Peace is entitled to a fee, whom does he
    look to for payment?"
    The legielature has provided in Article 6687b, Section
    22, for hearings on the revocation of driver's license to
    be held before a mayor, the judge of the police court, or a
    Justice of the Peace. These heaninqs have been viewed as
    administrative rather than criminal-in nature.
    mont of Public Safety v. Cox, 279 S.W.Zd 661
    1955. error ref. n.r.e.1: 7 Tex.Jur.Zd 340. Automobiles,
    Sec. 32. Article 6687b makes no provisions for the payment
    of fees by the Department of Public Safety or other state
    agency or anyone else to the Justice of the Peace for
    conducting hearings pursuant to Section 22, This office has
    previously held that the Department of Public Safety is not
    authorized to pay court costs for these hearings. Attorney
    General's Opinion No. V-554 (1948).
    -3858-
    Honorable Enrique II.Pena, Page 2      (M-794)
    A public officer, such as a Justice of the Peace, is
    entitled only to those fees prescribed by law. When the
    legislature imposes upon an officer an additional duty,
    such as the hearings under Section 22 of Article 6687b,
    without providing additional compensation, the officer
    must perform the-duty without exira compensation. McCalla
    v. City of Rockdale, 
    112 Tex. 209
    , 
    246 S.W. 654
    (1922);
    47 Tex. Jur.2d 213. 227-228. Public Officers. Sec. 168. ~'
    177; Attorney General's Opinion No. V-554 (1948). No -
    statutory authority provides for the payment of any fees
    for the administrative hearings in question. We there-
    fore are of the opinion that a Justice of the Peace is
    not entitled to an extra fee for conducting the adminstra-
    tive hearings in question.
    SUMMARY
    A Justice of the Peace is not entitled to
    any fee for conducting administrative hearings
    on the revocation or suspension of driver's
    license pursuant to Article 6667b, Vernon's
    Civil Statutes.
    Prepared by Roland Daniel Green, III
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    John Reeves
    Jerry Roberts
    Sally Phillips
    Steve ~ollahan
    -3859-
    Honorable Enrique H. Pena, Page 3     (M-794)
    MEADE F. GRIFFIN
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant Attorney f3eneral
    -3860-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-794

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017