-
February 18, 1971 Honorable Enrique H. Pena County Attorney Room 201;~City-County Building El,Paso, Texas 79901 Opinion No. M-794 Re: Fees for hearings before a Justice of the Peaoe for revocation of driver'8 liaense pursuant to Article 6687b, Section 22, Dear Mr. Penar Vernon's Civil Statutes. In your request for our opinion you ask what fees, if are payable to a Justice of the Peaae for conducting i%ings on the revocation of driver's license under Arti- cle 6687b, Section 22, Vernon's Civil Statutes, II . . . the anewer sought is not whether the Department of Pub1i.cSafety is author- ized to pay, but rather whether s agency, political subdivision,~or person, is obligated to pay a fee to a Justice of the Peace hear- ing these cases. And if the Justice of the Peace is entitled to a fee, whom does he look to for payment?" The legielature has provided in Article 6687b, Section 22, for hearings on the revocation of driver's license to be held before a mayor, the judge of the police court, or a Justice of the Peace. These heaninqs have been viewed as administrative rather than criminal-in nature. mont of Public Safety v. Cox, 279 S.W.Zd 661 1955. error ref. n.r.e.1: 7 Tex.Jur.Zd 340. Automobiles, Sec. 32. Article 6687b makes no provisions for the payment of fees by the Department of Public Safety or other state agency or anyone else to the Justice of the Peace for conducting hearings pursuant to Section 22, This office has previously held that the Department of Public Safety is not authorized to pay court costs for these hearings. Attorney General's Opinion No. V-554 (1948). -3858- Honorable Enrique II.Pena, Page 2 (M-794) A public officer, such as a Justice of the Peace, is entitled only to those fees prescribed by law. When the legislature imposes upon an officer an additional duty, such as the hearings under Section 22 of Article 6687b, without providing additional compensation, the officer must perform the-duty without exira compensation. McCalla v. City of Rockdale,
112 Tex. 209,
246 S.W. 654(1922); 47 Tex. Jur.2d 213. 227-228. Public Officers. Sec. 168. ~' 177; Attorney General's Opinion No. V-554 (1948). No - statutory authority provides for the payment of any fees for the administrative hearings in question. We there- fore are of the opinion that a Justice of the Peace is not entitled to an extra fee for conducting the adminstra- tive hearings in question. SUMMARY A Justice of the Peace is not entitled to any fee for conducting administrative hearings on the revocation or suspension of driver's license pursuant to Article 6667b, Vernon's Civil Statutes. Prepared by Roland Daniel Green, III Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman John Reeves Jerry Roberts Sally Phillips Steve ~ollahan -3859- Honorable Enrique H. Pena, Page 3 (M-794) MEADE F. GRIFFIN Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant Attorney f3eneral -3860-
Document Info
Docket Number: M-794
Judges: Crawford Martin
Filed Date: 7/2/1971
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017