Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1971 )


Menu:
  • Honorable David Wade, M.D.                 Opinion No. M- 796
    Commissioner, Texas Department of
    Mental Health and Mental Retardation     Re:   Moving expenses of
    Box 12668, Capitol Station                       employees of the Texas
    Austin, Texas 78711                              Department of Mental
    Health and Mental Re-
    Dear Dr. Wade:                                   tardation.
    Your request for an opinion asks the following questions:
    "1. Does Section 20(c) of Article II of
    House Bill 2, Acts of the 61st Legislature, Second
    Called Session, 1969, bring the Texas Department
    of Mental Health and Mental Retardation within
    the provisions of Section 35 of Article V of
    House Bill 2, Acts of the 61st Legislature,
    Second Called Session, 1969?
    "2. If your answer to question 1 is in the
    affirmative, are the provisions of the second
    paragraph of Section 35 of Article V of House
    Bill 2, Acts of the 61st Legislature, Second
    Called Session, 1969, applicable to the Texas
    Department of Mental Health and Mental Retarda-
    tion.?"
    In regard to moving expenses of employees of the Texas
    Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, Subdivision (c)
    of Section 20 of Article II of House Bill 2, Acts 61st Leg., 2nd
    C.S. 1969, (General Appropriations Act for the biennium ending
    August 31, 1971) provides:
    "The Texas Department of Mental Health and
    Mental Retardation is hereby authorized to utilize
    the services of its Motor Pool to transfer and
    deliver the household goods and effects of its
    employees transferred from one place of employment
    to another within the Department when such service
    to such employee Is deemed to be in the best in-
    terest of the State of Texas; provided, however,
    this service shall not be extended to any new
    employee."
    -3864-
    -   .
    Dr. David Wade, page 2          (M-796)
    Furthermore, Section 35 of Article V of House Bill 2,
    Acts 61st Leg., 2nd C.S. 1969, provides the following concerning
    moving expenses of State employees:
    "None of the moneys appropriated in this
    Act may be expended for paying expenses of moving
    the household goods or other property or personal
    effects of officers or employees, provided however,
    that the Department of Agriculture, State Building
    Commission, Texas Employment Commission, Highway
    Department, Alcoholics (sic) Beverage Commission,
    Parks and Wildlife Department, Railroad Commission,
    Department of Public Safety, Water Development
    Board, Water Quality Board, and other agencies
    when specifically granted such authority by this
    Act, are authorized to pay costs of transporting
    and delivering only in State-owned equipment the
    household goods and effects of employees trans-
    ferred by the named departments from one permanent
    station to another, when in the judgment of the
    department, the best interest of the State will
    be served by such transfer.
    "It is further provided that in the event
    State-owned equipment is not available, and to
    avoid imposing the hardship of an employee working
    in one location while his family and personal be-
    longings are located elsewhere, the above authority
    may be extended to Include the use of a commercial
    transportation company for the moving of the em-
    ployees' household goods and other personal effects.
    Such state agencies may not utilize State funds for
    such purposes except upon presentation by the officer
    or employee of a bona fide receipt of payment for
    services rendered from a commercial transportation
    company.
    "State agencies which are specifically au-
    thorized above or elsewhere in this Act to use
    funds appropriated In this Act to move the house-
    hold goods or personal effects of officials or
    employees transferred by official order to new
    permanent duty stations at State expense, shall
    file a report of such moves with the Legislative
    Budget Board by November 1 of each fiscal year.
    Such report is to cover the preceding fiscal year
    and include the number of such official transfers
    -3865-
    Dr. David Wade, page 3                  (M-796)
    made, the employees' name and position titles,
    distances involved, and the detail of all ex-
    penditures for such transfers. It is specifically
    provided that the authority grantet by this section
    shall not extend to new employees,
    In construing the above quoted rovisions it was held
    in Attorney General's Opinion M-660 (197'0
    P that your Department
    is given authority to utilize its motor pool in the manner antl-
    cipated by Section 
    35, supra
    , by the provisions of Subdivision (c)
    of Section 
    20, supra
    . It was further held:
    1,
    it is our o inion that the language
    of Sections 35 and 
    2O(c7, supra
    , relating to
    'permanent duty stations' and transfer of an
    employee from one place of employment to another
    'within the Department', contemplates the permanent
    State Institution to which he Is to be transferred,
    and not a temporary location at which he is to re-
    side pending construction of his permanent duty
    station. . . .'
    In answer to your first question you are therefore ad-
    vised that Subdivision (c) of Section 20 of Article II of House
    Bill 2, Acts 61st Leg., 2nd C.S. 1969, brings the Texas Department
    of Mental Health and Mental Retardation within the provisions of
    Section 35 of Article V of House Bill 
    2, supra
    , insofar as i,t
    relates to permanent duty stations and transfer of an employee
    from one place of employment to another within the Department
    on a permanent transfer, but does not apply to a temporary lo-
    cation at which he is to reside pending permanent duty station.
    Furthermore, Section 35 Is not applicable to any new employee
    because of the limitations contained In Subdivision (c) of Section
    
    20, supra
    .
    In answer to your second question you are advised that
    the provisions of Section 35 of Article 
    V, supra
    , Including the
    second paragraph thereof, are applicable to employees of the Texas
    Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation.
    SUMMARY
    Pursuant to the provisions of Subdivision (c)
    of Section 20 of Article II of House Bill 2, Acts
    61st Leg., 2nd C.S. 1969, the provisions of Section
    35 of Article V of House Bill 
    2, supra
    , are appli-
    cable to the Texas Department of Mental Health and
    -3866-
    Dr. David Wade, page 4            (M-796)
    Mental Retardation.   Attorney General's Opinion
    M-660 (1970).
    /?
    General of Texas
    Prepared by John Reeves
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITPEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
    William J. Craig
    Linward Shivers
    Brandon Bickett
    James Mabry
    MEADE F. GRIFFIN
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    First Assistant
    -3867-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-796

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1971

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017