Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1962 )


Menu:
  • Mr. H. D. Dodgen               Opinion No. WW-1439
    Executive Secretary
    Game and Fish Commlsslon       Re:   Validity of Item l2b
    Austin, Texas                        of the current appro-
    priation for the Game
    and Fish Commission,
    Ch. 62, Acts 1961, 57th
    Leg., 1st Called Ses-
    sion, regarding construc-
    tion of piers, ramps and
    Dear Mr. Dodgen:                     related questions.
    Your request for an opinion reads as follows:
    "Your opinion WW-959 dated November 15,
    1960, in response to a request from this Depart-
    ment held that 'The Legislature has not author-
    ized the Game and Fish Commission to expend
    funds from the (Special) Game and Fish Fund'
    for the construction of~piers Into the Gulf
    of Mexico or inland bays for the purpose of
    accommodating the public In recreational
    fishing activities.'
    .
    "Item 12b of the current appropriation
    for the Game and Fish Commission, Ch. 62. Acts
    1961, 57th Legislature, 1st Called Session, p.
    203 at p. 293, reads as follows:
    For the Years Ending
    August 31,       August 31,
    1962             1963
    b.   For construction   $                $
    of piers, ramps,
    restrooms, and
    shelters for the
    use of fishermen
    in State Parks
    along the Gulf
    Coast and other
    areas of the State,
    including NTE $8,000
    for rehabilitating
    Mr. H. D. Dodgen, page 2 (W-1439)
    the Port Lavaca pier,
    out of receipts to
    the Special Game and
    Fish Fund derived from
    fishing licenses. . . .
    . . . . . . . . . . $100,000          $100,000
    "The Game and Fish Commission has not expended
    the funds thereby appropriated, in the belief that
    the appropriation is void by reason of a lack of
    pre-exlstln law, Article 3, Sec. 44, Constitution
    of Texas, 1%76. A bill was introduced at the
    Regular Session of the 57th Legislature which
    would have specifically authorized such an ex-
    penditure; however, it did not pass.
    "In view of the fact of the appropriation,
    It is deemed advisable again to seek the opinion
    of the Attorney General in respect to the question:
    "Is the appropriation contained in
    Item 
    12b, supra
    , a valid and effec-
    tive appropriation?"
    Attorney General's Opinion WW-959 (1960) held that
    the Legislature had not authorized the Game and Fish Commission
    to construct piers into the Gulf of Mexico or the inland bays
    for the purpose of accommodating the public in recreational
    fishing activities.
    House Bill 710, introduced at the Regular Session of
    the 57th Legislature, would have expressly authorized the ex-
    penditure contained in Item 12b of the appropriations for the
    Game and Fish Commission. However, this bill was not passed
    out of the Game and Fish Committee of the House.
    Article III, Section 44 of the Texas Constitution
    provides as follows:~
    "Sec. 44. The Legislature shall provide by
    law for the compensation of all officers, serv-
    ants, agents and public contractors, not provided
    for in this Constitution, but shall not grant
    extra compensation to any officer, agent, serv-
    ant, or public contractors, after such public
    service shall have been performed or contract
    entered into, for the performance of the same;
    Mr. H. D. Dodger% Page 3 (WW-1439)
    nor grant, by appropriation or otherwise, any
    amount of money out of the Treasury of the State,
    to any individual, on a claim, real or pretended,
    when the same shall not have been provided for
    by pre-existing law; nor employ any one in the name
    of the State, unless authorized by pre-existing
    law."
    On the basis of the provisions of this Section, it
    has been uniformly held that an appropriation by the Legis-
    lature is void, If not authorized by pre-existing law. State
    v. Haldeman, 
    163 S.W. 1020
    (Civ.App. 1913, error ref.); mn
    National Dank v. Sheppard, 
    123 Tex. 272
    , 
    71 S.W.2d 242
    (1934);
    Corsicana Cotton Mills v. Sheppard, 
    123 Tex. 352
    , 71 S.W.2d.
    247 (1934).
    Therefore, you are advised that the appropriation
    contained in Item 
    12b, supra
    , is void by reason of the absence
    of pre-existing law.
    SUMMARY
    Item 12b of the Current Appropriation for
    the Game and Fish Commission, Ch. 62, Acts 1961,
    57th Legislature, 1st Called Session, regarding
    the construction of piers, ramps, and related
    structures is void by reason of the absence of
    pre-existing law.
    Very truly yours,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney General of Texas
    IRW:mkh
    Assistant
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Robert Rowland
    Norman Suarez
    Grady Chandler
    REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    BY: Leonard Passmore
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-1439

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1962

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017