Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1967 )


Menu:
  •     .    .
    Dr. George J. Beto                      Opinion No. MT97
    Director
    Texas Department of Corrections
    Huntevllle, Texas                       Re:   Whether the Department of
    Corrections   may legally
    require the return of
    Robert Samuel Frank to
    serve the remainder of
    his sentence.
    Dear Dr. Beto:
    You have requested     an opinion     of this   office   on the
    following   facts:
    Inmate’Robert Samuel Franks .T.D.C!; #x26098, whose
    parole was revoked onSeptember 16, 1963, under Proclamation
    No’. 63-3379, Is currently being held by authorities    in the
    State of New Jersey, and is refusing extradition     to Texas on
    the grounds that he does not owe this State any remaining
    time on his original   conviction.
    ‘The Inmate was originally    received In the TexasDe;
    partment of Corrections    from Potter County on May 2, 1953,
    to serve a lo-year   sentence for the offense of robbery.      Sen-
    tence to begin on December 2, 1952.       After having been credi-
    ted with 5 years, 7 months and 22 days on his original      sen-
    tence, the Inmate, on June 7, 1956, was granted an out-of-
    state conditional  pardon to the State of New Jersey by Procla-
    mation No. 56-0860.
    Hy Proclamation No. 584210, dated February 7, 1958,
    the Governor revoked Proclamation No. 56-0860 for violation
    of the conditions  of parole.
    By Proclamation No, 61-3720, dated November 9, 1961,
    the Governor granted another conditional   pardon to New Jersey
    “with no credit for time served on prior conditional   pardon,
    . . . .    (Hmphasis supplied).
    - 440 -
    Dr. George J. Beto,   Page 2 (M-97 )
    ProclamationNo.’   62-1115, dated April 16, 1962, re-
    voked the conditional     pardon granted by Proclamation No.
    61-3720,‘holding     same to be null and void and of no force
    and effect.
    By Proclamation No. 62-3776, dated November 16,
    1962; then Governor reinstated  the. conditionals pardon’ to Neti
    Jersey, granted him”on November 9, 1961, under Proclamation
    No. 61-3720, which was revoked’on April 16, 1962; under-
    Proclamation No. 62-1115, and set aside said revocation.
    . By Proclamation No. 63-3379; dated Se tember 13,
    1963, the Governor revoked Proclamation No. %l-3720 and
    ordered the Inmate be taken into custody and delivered  to
    the authorities  of the Texas Department of Corrections to
    serve the remainder of his sentence.
    By the terms of Proclamation No, 61-3720, dated
    November 9, 1961, Rob~ert Samuel Frank was denied credit
    for time served on prior conditional      pardon dated June 7,
    1956 (No. 56-0860). On June 7, 1956, when he was granted
    his first   out-of-state   conditional  pardon, he had been
    credited with 5 years, 7 months and 22 days on his original
    sentence.    Under the terms of Proclamation No. 61-3720, he
    was not credited,for     the time served from June 7, 1956 to
    November 9, 1961, a total of 5 years, 5 months and 2 days.
    Although the Proclamation No. 62-1115 revoked Proclamation
    No. 61-3720 and held same to be null and void, nevertheless,
    Proclamation No. 62-3776 reinstated      Proclamation No. 61-
    3720 fully,   thereby denying the Inmate credit for time
    served on parole between June 7, 1956 and November 9, 1961.
    The Governor has the right to issue conditional    par-
    dons and extending them on such conditions     as deemed by him
    to be advisable,   and when such clemency Is accepted by the
    prisoner,   he becomes bound by such conditions,    and upon
    determination   by the Governor that the prisoner has failed
    to fulfill   the conditions   of the clemency proclamation,
    the Governor is authorized to revoke such clemency, and the
    prisoner is not entitled     to credit on his sentence for the
    time he is at large.      Ex Parte Bryant, 230 S.w.2d 824 (Tex.
    Crlm. 1950).
    Each of the proclamations   of the Governor granting
    a conditional  pardon were conditioned   as follows:
    - 441 -
    Dr. George J. Beto,   Page, 3 (M-97,)
    If, however, he is guilty at any
    time'of   any misconduct or violation      of the
    law or fails to comply in any way with the
    terms hereof or for any other reason the
    Governor'may deem~suffjcient      (including   any
    facts not known to the Governor at the time
    of this clemency) this pardon shall be and
    is subject, to revocatfon    at the Governor's
    discretion,    with or without hearing, as the
    Governor may determine, and upon revocation
    by the Governor of this pardon, the same
    shall become and-,be null and void and of no
    force and effect,    and the Subject shall be,
    by order of the Governor, returned to and
    confined in the Penitentiary     to serve the
    sentence originally    imposed upon him or so
    much thereof as had not been served by the
    Subject at the time of his release under
    the terms of this or any previous clemency
    and the time during which the Subject is at
    large under this or any previous clemency
    shall not be considered or credited to the
    Subject as time served on his original        sen-
    tence."
    Also, each proclamation    of the Governor, revoking the
    conditional  pardon recited that he would receive no
    credit on his sentence for the time he was at large un-
    der the conditional   pardon.
    Under the facts presented, it is the opinion of
    this office   that Robert Samuel Frank must serve the re-
    maining 4 years, 4 months and 8 days on his original   con-
    viction.
    The authorities   attached to your letter,    touching
    the right to revoke probation during the probationary
    period, have no application     and are not controlling    where
    the probationary   period has not terminated.
    The Court of Criminal Appeals in Ex Parte Cochran,
    
    253 S.W.2d 443
    (195~2)~ held that where a reprfeve granted
    reiator provided that; upon violation      of stated conditions,
    time out of prison did not count as time served on a 25-
    year sentence,   and thereafter   a pardon was granted upon
    conditions   of relator's  previous clemency, the pardon was
    but a renewal of the original     contract by the relator and
    - 442 -
    Dr. George      J. Beto,   Page 4 (M-97 )
    the Governorand,  therefore;’ time during which relator was
    at large before the pardon was revoked would not be credited
    to’time served on the sentence upon violation  of the condi-
    tions of parole.
    SUMMARY
    Under the facts stated, the Governor’s
    revocation  in Proclamation No.‘6313379 is
    valid a8 the probationary   period had not
    ternlnated,  and the Department of Correc-
    tions may legally   require the return of
    Robert Saauel Frank to serve the remainder
    of his eentence.
    truly     yours,
    L?J7 Lz=--
    C. MARTIN
    General of Texas
    Prepared by Gilbert J. Pena
    A8siStant Attorney General
    GJP/dt
    APPROVED:
    OPINIONCOMMITTEE
    Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman
    W. V. Geppert, Co-Chairman
    Robert E. Owen
    Sam Kelley
    Pat Bailey
    Harold Kennedy
    A. J. Carubbi, Jr.
    Staff Legal Assistant
    - 443 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-97

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1967

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017