Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1967 )


Menu:
  •                              A
    F        EXAS
    AUSTIN.   TEXAS       m3711
    C,HAWFORlD    C. lMARTlN
    .a-l-rORN~X (IENERAI.
    February 15, 1967
    Mr. Coke R. Stevenson, Jr.           Opinion No .~M- 26
    Administrator
    Texas Liquor Control Board           Re:     1s the Texas Liquor Control
    Austin, Texas                                Board authorized to issue a
    carrier’s permit to an alr-
    line company holding a certl-
    flcate of convenience and
    necessity Issued by the
    Clvll Aeronautics Board of
    the United States, even though
    It does not hold a like certi-
    flcate from the Railroad Com-
    mission of Texas or the Inter-
    state Commerce Commission of
    Dear Mr. Stevenson:                         the United States?
    You have requested.an opinion from this office on the
    above captioned ~questlon.
    Artlole 666~15(12) of Vernon’s Penal Code provides, in
    part, as follows :
    “(12) Carrier Permlt. The word tcarrler8
    when used in this Section shall mean and
    Include water carriers, airplane lines, all
    steam, electric, and motor power railway
    carriers, and common carrier motor carriers
    operating under a certificate of convenience
    and necessity issued by the Railroad Commission
    of Texas or by certificate,8Issued by the
    Interstate Commerce Commission. The holders
    of such certificates shall be authorized to
    transport liquor into and out of this State
    and between pointswithin this State. Such
    carriers shall furnish such information oon-
    cernlng the transportation of liquor as may
    be required by the Board.”
    The Texas Liquor Control Act was passed In 19% with the
    words “airplane lines” not included in Article 666~15(12). In
    1937 the Texas Legislature amended this section to include
    “airplane lines”, but did not amend the requirement that all
    such carriers be holders of certificates of convenience and
    - 109 -
    .      -
    Mr. coke R. Stevenson, Jr., page 2, (M-26)
    necessity from either the Texas Railroad Commission or the
    Interstate Commerce Commission. Subsequent amendments have
    not, to this date, changed this requirement as to airplane
    lines.
    The Texas Railroad Commission was ~establlshed by statute
    In 1891 to regulate railroads in Texas. Since that time the
    activities of the Railroad Commission have been broadened to
    include motor carriers on State highways, 011 and gas, and
    gas companies. The Rallroad Commission has not, since its
    Inception In 1891, had any statutory authority over "airplane
    lines".
    The Interstate Commerce Act of 188,7, 24 U.S. Stat.L. 379,
    created the Interstate Commerce Commission to regulate trans-
    portation by common carrier of passengers or property when made
    wholly by railroad or partly by railroad and partly by water
    when both are used. An amendment In 1917, 40 U.S. Stat.L. 101,
    gave the Interstate Commerce Commission the power to establish
    reasonable rules and regulations. A further amendment in 1920,
    41 U.S. Stat.L. 474, expended coverage to Include 011 pipe lines
    and wire or wireless communication. This 1920 amendment also
    called for Issuance of certificates of pub110 convenience and
    necessity.
    Jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission was also
    extended by the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 U.S. Stat.L. 543.
    Section 207(a) of that Act called for the Issuance of certificates
    of public convenience and necessity. The Transprrtatlon Act of
    1940, 54 U.S. Stat.L. 898, again modified the Interstate Commerce
    Commission, but did not lrcrease the areas under the Commission's
    control.
    Federal control over avlatlon began with the Alr Commerce
    Act OS 1926, 44 U.S. Stat.L. 568. The provisions of this Act
    were to be enforced by the Secretary of the Department of Com-
    merce, with full powers to provide for the Issuance of any type
    of certificate he deemed necessary.
    In the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938, 52 U.S. Stat.L. 971,
    Congress created the Civil Aeronautics Authority and transfer-ed
    all officers and personnel hired by the Secretary of Commerce
    under the Air Commerce Act of 1926 to this new Authority.
    This 1938 Act provided in Sec. 401(a) that "no air carrier
    shall engage In air transportation unless there Is In force a
    certificate issued by the Authority authorizing such." Sec.
    401(d) provided for the "Issuance of Certl+Ycate if such trans-
    portation Is required by public oonvenlence and necessity."
    Sec. 701(a) created the Air Safety Board to operate Independent
    of the Authority in the area of alr safety.
    - 110-
    Mr. Coke R. Stevenson,;Jr., .Mge 3, (M-26)
    This division of responsibility led to a reorganization
    in 1940 which sew certain functions of the Civil Aeronautics
    Authority,transferred to an Administrator of Civil Aeronautics.
    Only those functions dealing with air safety and the Air Safety
    Board were excepted from this Initial reorganization. A second
    reorganization saw the Administrator of Civil Aeronautics and
    the Air Safety Board transferred,to the Department of Commerce.
    Finally, as a part of this second step, the Civil Aeronautics
    Board was created out of the combined functions of the Air
    Safety Board and what .remalnedof the Civil Aeronautics Au-
    thority. The Civil Aeronautics Board as part of Its duties
    was to Initiate Investigation of aircraft accidents, prescribe
    safety rules and preside over hearings looking to the suspension
    and revocation of certificates. The Air Safety Board and Civil
    Aeronautics Authority were effectively abolished by this re-
    organization.
    In 1958 Congress passed the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.,S.C.A.
    8s 1301 et seq., which created the Pederal Aviation Qency,   @g
    1341-1355, to assume the duties and function of the Civil Aero-
    nautlcs Administration; and which brought the Civil Aeronautics
    Board, 881321-1325, under Its jurisdiction. Section 1171(a)
    of the Federal Aviation Program,provides that no air carrier
    shall engage In a,nyair ,transportationunless there is In force
    a certificate of,publlc convenience and necessity issued by the
    Board (Civil Aeronautics Board) authorizing such air carrier to
    engage In such transportation.
    The foregoing analysis of statutory authority shows that
    the Texas Railroad Commission and the Unlted States Interstate
    Commerce Commission have never had the authorltx to Issue certlz-
    lcates of public convenience and necessity to airplane 1Lnes.
    At present only the Clvll Aeronautics Board of the United States
    exercises this function In Interstate commerce. This Board was
    established In 1940, but Its predecessors In responsibility had
    their beginning in 1926, separate and apart from the Interstate
    Commerce Commission. Thus, It cannot be said that the Civil
    Aeronautics Board has “lnherlted” any of Its powers from the
    Interstate Commerce Commission.
    It Is apparent that the Texas Legislature Intended for
    the Texas Liquor Control Board to have authority to issue permits
    under Article 666~15(12) to “airplane lines” when it amended the
    statute In 1937. In view of the fact, as outlined above, that
    the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Railroad Commission
    never had the authority to Issue certificates of convenience
    and necessity to “airplane lines”, this 1937 amendment needed
    the additional requirement, with respect to “airplane lines”,
    - 111 -
    Mr. Coke R. Stevenson, Jr., Page 4, (M-26)
    that the applicant have a certlfloate of convenience and neces-
    sity from the federal or state agency authorized to Issue same.
    When literal enforcement of a'statute would 1 d to conse-
    quences which the Legislature could not have %ended,    the
    statute should be given a construction which will promote the
    declared purpose of the le lslatlon. Baldridge v. State, 
    321 S.W.2d 309
    (Tex.Crim. 19597 . Therefore, It i the 0pinZon of
    this office that the Texas Liquor Control BoaFd is authorized
    to issue a Carrier's Permit as defined in Article 666~15(12),
    Vernon's Penal Code, to an airline company holding a Certlf-
    lcate of Public Convenience and Necessity issued by the Civil
    Aeronautics Board of the United States, even though it does
    not hold a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity from the
    Railroad Commission of Texas or such certificate Issued by
    the Interstate Commerce Commission of the United States,
    SUNMARY
    The Texas Liquor Control Board Is authorized
    to issue a Carrier's Permit as defined in
    Article 666~15(12), Vernon's Penal Code, to
    an airline company holding a Certificate of
    Public Convenience and Necessity Issued by
    the Civil Aeronautics Board of the United
    States, even though It does not hold a Cer-
    tificate of Convenience and Necessity from
    the Railroad Commission of Texas or such
    certificate issued by the Interstate Commerce
    Commission of the United States.
    truly yours,
    Prepared by James H. Quick
    Assistant Attorney General
    :vmo
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman
    W. V. Geppert, Co-chairman
    Paul Martin
    Llnward Shivers
    Houghton Brownlee, Jr.
    W. 0. Shultz
    A. J. CARUBBI, JR.
    Staff Legal Assistant        - 112 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-26

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1967

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017