Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1966 )


Menu:
  •       Honorable James E. Barlow           Opinion No. c-695
    Criminal Dlstrlct Attorney
    Bexar   county                      HE:   Whether the County
    San Antonio, Texas                        Clerk has the duty
    to record a deed con-
    ATTN: Mr. Vernon T. Sanford, Jr.          veylng real property
    Assistant Criminal District         located within a sub-
    Attorney                          division in the absence
    County Affairs Section              of proof   that   Article
    974a, V.C.S., has been
    complied with and re-
    Dear Mr. Barlow:                          lated questions.
    In your recent letter, you requested an Attorney General’s
    Opinion with reference to problems arising as a result of the
    failure of subdividers of land within the corporate limits or
    extraterrltorlaljurisdictionof the City OS San Antonio to re-
    cord maps or plats of aubdlvlsionaor re-eubdivlaiona.
    In that connection, you stated that such subdividershave
    been “selling their subdivided lots by means of deeds referring
    to an unrecorded plat Sollowed by a metes and bounds description
    and sometimes by means of deeds containing only a metes and
    .-.   bounds description” (without any reference to the unrecorded
    pl&ta reflecting subdividedacreage out of which the tracts con-.
    veyed by such deeds are carved); and you ask if the County Clerk
    la required, upon request, to file and record such deeds, when
    properly acknowledged, under the provisions of Article 6626,
    Vernon’s Civil Statutes, or if the County Clerk, prior to filing
    such deeds, Is burdened with the duty to determine the location
    of the land covered by such deeds and, upon determining that
    such land is located within the city or extraterritorial Juris-
    diction thereof, to refuse to file and record such deeds until
    the provisions of Article g4a, Vernon’s Civil Statutes,  iS
    applicable, are complied with.
    When requested to file and record any deed, including
    “deeds referring to an unrecorded plat followed by a metes and
    bounds description” or I’deedacontaining only a metes and bounds
    description” (without any reference to the unrecorded plats re-
    flecting subdlvlded acreage out OS which the tracts covered by
    such deeds are carved), the County Clerk is governed by the pro-
    visions of said Article 6626, the pertinent portions of which
    are as follows:
    -3346-
    .   -
    L-1
    Honorable James E. Barlow, page 2 (C-695)
    "The Sollowlng Instrumentsof writing which
    shall have been acknowledgedor proved according
    to law, are authorized to be recorded, viz: all
    deeds, . . . or other Instrumentsof writing con-
    cerning any lands or tenements, . . . provided,
    however, that In cases of aubdlvlalonor re-aub-
    dlvlalon of real property no map or plat of any
    such subdivision or re-subdivisionshall be filed
    or recorded unless and until the same shall have
    been authorized by the CommissionersCourt of the
    county In which the real estate'Is situated by
    order duly entered In the minutes of said Court,
    except in cases of the partition or other subdl-
    vision through a court of record; provided that
    where the real estate Is situated within the cor-
    porate limits or within five miles of the corpor-
    ate limits of any incorporatedcity or town, the'
    governing body thereof or the ,cltyplanning com-
    mission, as the case may be, as provided in Artl-
    cle g4a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, shall
    perform the duties hereinaboveImposed upon the
    'CommlssIoneraCourt.n
    Said Article 6626 clearly authorizes the recording of all
    properly acknowledged deeds, Including-suchdeeds containing
    the types of descriptions referred to hereinabove.
    In that regard, the Sollowlng holding reflects the duty
    placed upon the County Clerk:
    '"It la the duty of the county clerk to re-
    cord all deposited written Instrumentsauthorized,
    required or permitted to be recorded in his office.
    "The clerk's mlnlsterlalduty to record la
    properly enforced by mandamus." Turrentlne vs.
    Iaaane, 
    389 S.W.2d 336
    (Tex.Clv.App.,1965).
    Prior to the filing and recording of maps or plats of aub-
    divisions or re-subdlvlslons,said Article 6626 requires proper
    authorization of such maps or plats In the manner therein set
    forth; however, no prior authorizationIs therein required as
    a prerequisite to the filing and recording of any other lnatru-
    ments of writing (specificallyIncluding deeds) concerning any
    lands or tenements.    -
    Furthermore, said Article 97&a, and Article 427b, Vernon's
    Penal Code, to which you referred In your aforementioned letter,
    provide for the Imposition of certain duties only In connection
    with the preparation, filing and recording of plans, maps, plats
    -3347-
    ,
    &-’   .
    Honorable James E. E&Wow, page 3 (c-695)
    or replata of aubdlvlalona or additions and not ln,any con-
    nection whatsoever with deeds.
    Finally, Article 1137h, Vernon's Penal Code, which you
    also mentioned In your letter to this office, makes any party
    "subdividing or re-subdividingany real estate" guilty  of a
    misdemeanor IS such party uses "the aubdlvlslon~aor re-aub-
    division's description In any deed of conveyance or contract
    of sale delivered to a purchaser unless and until the map
    and plat of such aubdlvlalon or re-subdivisionshall have
    been duly authorized (as therein provided) and such map and
    plat thereof has actually been filed for record with the
    Clerk of the County Court of the county in which the real
    estate Is situated." Said Article 1137h la applicable, there-
    Sore, only to parties subdividing or resubdlvldlngreal estate
    and Is not applicable to County Clerks In the performance of
    their official duties. As to such parties subdividing and
    resubdlvldlng real estate, it should also be noted that said
    Article 1137h provides for a Sine and/or conflnement~lnthe
    county jail upon conviction of such misdemeanor.
    In answer to your request for clarlSlcatlonof Attorney
    General's Opinion No. V-934 (1949) wherein It Is stated that
    the owner of a subdivision "Is not authorized to subdivide
    his tract unless he complies with the provisions of (said
    Article) gi'4a;"and, "IS the owner falls to make a map or
    plat as required, the County Clerk should refuse to record
    the field notes submitted to his office," It Is our opinion
    that the field notes of a subdivision cannot be recorded in
    the plat records unless the field notes are accompanied by
    _H-       a duly authorized map or platof such subdivision for record-
    ing, and It Is our further oprnlon that the term "field notes"
    as used therein does not refer to or mean metes and bounds
    &;;rlptlona contained In deeds of conveyance or contracts of
    .
    SUMNARY
    The County Clerk is re ulred by the
    provisions of Article B626, V.C.S.,
    to file and record upon request prop-
    erly acknowledged deeds, notwlthstand-
    lng a failure of compliance with the
    provisions of Article q4a, V.C.S.,
    with reference to the recordatlon of
    plats (or plans, maps or replats) of
    -3348-
    .   .3       *                                                   ..,
    I
    .       .
    Honorable James E. Barlow, page 4 (c-695)
    subdlvlalona or additions, out of
    which the tracts of land deacrlbed
    In such deeds are carved.
    Very truly yours,
    WAQOONERCARR
    Assistant Attorney General
    CDJjr/lre
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Larry Craddock
    John Reeves
    Pat Bailey
    Roger Tgler
    APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    By: T. B. Wright
    -3349-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-695

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1966

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017