Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1966 )


Menu:
  • Hon. Joe Resweber                  Opinion No. C- 633
    County Attorney
    Harris County                      Re:   Whether a jury fee should
    Houston, Texas                           be paid in a juvenile case
    before a jury is allowed
    any party, and related
    Dear Mr. Resweber:                       questions.
    By your letter of February 1, 1966, you have requested
    an opinion in regard to the above stated matter. Your letter
    specifically contains the following questions:
    "1. Should a jury fee be paid in a
    juvenile case before a jury is allowed any
    party?
    "2. Should court costs be collected in
    contempt proceedings, where an adult party
    has been cited for contempt, for failure to
    pay child support in accordance with previous
    orders of the Juvenile Court, and found guilty
    thereof?
    "3. If either of the above questions is
    answered in the affirmative, who Is responsible
    for these fees and court costs?n
    The above questions will be considered in light of
    Article 2388-1, Vernon's Civil Statutes, which govern juvenile
    delinquency cases, and Articles 2380 to 2337 (inclusive) which
    govern juvenile dependency and neglect cases.
    Section 13 of Article 2838-1 provides in part as
    follows:
    "The Judge may conduct the hearing in
    an informal manner and may adjourn the hearing
    from time to time. . .If no jury is demanded
    the judge shall proceed with the h earing. . . .n
    (Emphasis added).
    Hon. Joe Resweber, page 2   (c-633)
    Subsection (3) of Section 13 of Article 2338-l states
    in part:
    Section 21 of Article 2338-lprovides, in part, as
    follows:
    "An appeal may be taken by any party
    aggrieved to the Court of CIvilAppeals and
    the case may be carried to the Supreme Court
    by writ of error or upon certificate as in
    other civil cases." (Emphasis added).
    In Dendy v. Wilson, 
    142 Tex. 460
    , 
    179 S.W.2d 269
    (1944), the Court states at page 274:
    "The act /F338-17provides for a jury
    trial when a jrry is3emanded, and authorizes
    the trial court to order a jury on Its own
    motion. Nothing Is said about the payment of
    a jury fee.      .We think, however, that
    the whole act'discloses that the legislature
    intended that proceedings instituted thereunder
    should be governed as far as practicable by the
    rules relating to civil practice." (Emphasis
    added).
    In Steed v. State, 
    143 Tex. 82
    , 
    183 S.W.2d 458
    (lg44),
    the Court stated at page 459:
    It
    .the legislature has made it abundantly
    clear Ghit this is a civil matter, and this court
    has followed the plain legislative Intent. It
    follows from this conclusion. . .that the rules
    of procedure relating to civil actions are ap-
    plicable to this case." (Emphasis added).
    The Court of Criminal Appeals also takes the position
    that Article 2338-l is a civil statute and proceedings thereunder,
    -3073-
    Hon. Joe Resweber, page 3    (C-633)
    Including commitment, are civil and not criminal in nature.
    Hultin v. State, 
    171 Tex. Crim. 475
    , 
    351 S.W.2d 248
    (1961).
    In Re Gonzales, 
    328 S.W.2d 475
    (Tex.Civ.APP. 1965,
    error ref.    n.r.e.), the Court stated at page 477:
    "A jury trial may be had only by com-
    lying with Texas Rules of Civil Procedure."
    Emphasis added).
    Article 2334, which concerns dependent and neglected
    child cases, states:
    "Any person Interested in any case under
    this title may appear therein and may be repres-
    ented by counsel, and may demand a jury as In
    other cases. If no jury is demanded, it sharl
    b deemed to have been waived. The judge of
    t:e court of his own motion, may order a jury
    to try suih case.' (Emphasis added).
    The same language quoted above can be found In Para-
    graph 3 of Article 2337, which concerns a hearing on support
    payments, after a finding of neglect and dependency.
    There are no cases specifically holding that a party
    demanding a jury according to Article 2334 or 2337, must comply
    with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. However, in Ex Parte
    Franklin, 
    393 S.W.2d 632
    Tex.Ci.v.App.1965, no writ historyf,
    the Court states at page i33:
    "The hearing from which the above described
    judgment and order was issued by the court was
    had on November 13, 1964. Prior to the hearing
    the father demanded a jury and deposited the
    customary jury fee." [Emphasis added).
    In light of the above quoted authorities, it is our
    opinion that juvenile cases under Article 2338-l and Articles
    2330-2337 (inclusive) are civil. In order to obtain a jury
    trial in a civil case, either Rule 216 or 217, Texas Rules of
    Civil Procedure must be satisfied, Rule 216 states:
    "No jury trial shall be had in any civil
    suit, unless application be made therefor and
    unless a fee of five dollars if in the district
    court and three dollars if in the county court
    be deposited by the applicant with the clerk
    -3074-
    Hon. Joe Resweber, page 4   (C-633)
    to the use of the county on or before appearance
    day, or if thereafter a reasonable time before
    the date set for trial of the cause on the non-
    jury docket, but not less than ten days in ad-
    vance. The clerk shall promptly enter a nota-
    tion of the payment of such fee upon the court's
    docket sheet."
    Rule 217, states:
    "The deposit for a jury fee shall not be
    required when the party shall within the time
    for making such deposit, file with the clerk
    his affidavit to the effect that he is unable
    to make such deposit and that he cannot; by
    the pledge of property,or otherwise obtain the
    money necessary for that purpose; and the
    court shall then order t;e clerk to enter the
    suit onthe jury docket.
    In order to demand a jury under the above stated rules,
    a party must either pay the fee or file the affidavit of in-
    ability to pay. Therefore, It is our opinion that these rules
    must be complied with In cases arising under Article 2338-l and
    Articles 2330-2337 (inclusive).
    Question #2 concerns contempt proceedings under Article
    2337 and Section 13-A of Article 23384,  for failure to comply
    with support orders entered in both dependency cases and delin-
    quency cases. Article 2337 provides, in part, as follows:
    .It   is further provided. ~. .that
    such pas&t or other responsible person shall
    pay in the manner directed by the court such
    sum as will in whole or in part support such
    child.        .The court shall have full power
    to enforde'said judgments for support by civil
    contempt proceedings. . . .n
    Section 13-A of Article 2338-1, has the same language
    as quoted above from Article 2337, giving the Court contempt
    power following a finding of delinquency.
    Having concluded above that cases under Article 2338-1
    and Articles    2330-2337 (inclusive) are civil cases, then it
    follows that contempt proceedings under these Articles must
    necessarily be civil, and therefore subject to the same rule
    of costs as in other civil cases. Rule 125, Texas Rules of Civil
    Procedure provides:
    -3075-
    Hon. Joe Resweber, page 5 (C-633)
    "Each party to a suit shall be liable to
    the officers of the court for all costs in-
    curred by himself."
    Rule 127, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, provides:
    "Each party to a suit shall be liable
    for a13 costs incurred by him. If the costs
    cannot be collected from the party against
    whom they have been adjudged, execution may
    issue against any party in such suit for the
    amount oft'
    costs incurred by such party, but
    no more.
    Rule 145, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, provides in
    part as follows:
    "A party who is required to give security
    for costs may file with the clerk or justice
    of the peace an affidavit that he is too poor
    to pay the costs. . . .
    Attorney General's Opinion No. v-1484 (1952), states
    in part as follows:
    n
    . . .And costs are assessable in all
    civil actions unless an applicable statute
    expressly provides otherwise." (Emphasis
    added).
    No statutes expressly exempt assessment of costs in
    contempt proceedings follow1   support orders under Article
    2338-l or Articles 2330-2337"Tinclusive). Also, It is noted
    that in contempt proceedings for child support following a
    divorce action costs are assessed. Livingston v. Nealy, 
    382 S.W.2d 511
    (Tex.Civ.App. 1964, error ref. n.r.e.).marte
    Helms, 
    152 Tex. 480
    , 
    259 S.W.2d 184
    (1953).
    Therefore, it is our opinion that Question #2 must
    be answered in the affirmative. Costs should be assessed in
    contempt proceedings In accordance with the above quoted rules
    of procedure.
    Question #3 poses the problem of who is liable for
    jury fees under Articles 2338-l and 2330-2337 (inclusive); And
    the problem of who Is liable for costs in contempt proceedings
    under Articles 2338-l and 2330-2337 (inclusive).
    It is this office's opinion that the party demanding
    jury trial under Articles 2334, 2337 or 2338-1 must pay fees in
    -3076-
    Hon. Joe Resweber, page 6   (C-633)
    compliance with Rules 216 and 217, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
    It is our further opinion that costs should be as-
    sessed against the defendant in contempt proceedings under
    Article 2 37 or Article 2338-l a8 provided for by Rules 125,
    127 and 125, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
    SUMMARY
    A jury fee should be paid in compliance with
    Rules 216 and 217, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure,
    for juvenile cases arising under Article 2338-l
    or Articles 2330-2337 (inclusive).
    Court costs should be collected in contempt
    proceedings under Article 2337 or Section 13-A
    of Article 2338-l. Such costs should be assessed
    the defendant in accordance with Rules 125, 127
    and 145, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
    Very truly yours,
    WAGGGNRR CARR
    Attorney Qeneral
    JCMcC:mkh
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. 0. Shultz, Chairman
    H. Grady Chandler
    Pat Bailey
    Milton Richardson
    Robert Flowers
    APPROVRDFOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    BY: T. B. Wright
    -3077-