Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1964 )


Menu:
  •          THEATJFORNEYGENERAL
    OF   TEXAS
    Honorable Jerry Sadler
    Commissioner of the General Land Office
    and Chairman of the School Land Board
    Austin, Texas
    Opinion No. C-349
    Re:    Whether the School Land Board
    in fixing the consideration for
    an amendment of a term mineral
    lease may increase the royalty
    Dear Mr. Sadler:                  chargeable under such lease.
    You request our opinion as to the authority of the School
    Land Board in granting amendments to existing mineral leases
    under Article 5344c, Vernon's Civil Statutes, to increase the
    royalty required to be paid.
    We are informed that over the years the State of Texas
    issued a considerable number of 25-year term oil and gas leases.
    In order to prevent the rapid depletion of reserves under such
    areas and to prevent wasteful production practices, and to in-
    crease the revenue of the Public Free School J?und,Iiouse.Bill
    17, Acts of the 50th Legislature, Regular Session 1947, Chapter
    82, page 139, codified in Vernon's as Article 5344c, Vernon's
    Civil Statutes, was enacted. (Section 5 of House Bill 17).
    This Act authorized the School Land Board, on application made
    prior to October 1, 1948,to amend such leases so as to extend
    the term thereof for as long as minerals are being produced in
    paying quantities and authorized the Board to fix the consideration
    for each such amendment. (Section 2 of House Bill 17.).
    Section 2 of House Bill 17, Acts of the 50th Legislature,
    Regular Session 1947, was amended in 1963by the enactment of
    Senate Bill 196,Acts of the 58th Legislature, Regular Session
    1963,Chapter 174, age 485, so as to change the cutoff date
    from October 1, 194f; to January 1, 1965. No other change was
    made by the 1963amegdment. Section 2, as amended, now provides:
    "Sec. 2. Any lease heretofore granted and
    in good standing covering any of the lands
    -1657-
    --    *
    Hon. Jerry Sadler, Page 2 (c-349)
    or areas referred to in Section 1 of this Act,
    upon application by any owner thereof to the
    Commissioner of the General Land Office before
    January 1, 1965,may be amended under the terms
    of this Act so as to provide that such lease
    shall remain in effect as long after the~expira-
    tion of its primary term as oil, gas, or other
    mineral covered by ,suchlease is produced there-
    from, provided any amendment executed by virtue
    of this Act shall include only those ,minerals
    covered in the original agreement to which said
    amendment is made; and providing further, that
    in ame'ndingsuch,leases same shall be amended and
    renewed separately as to each mineral thereunder,
    except as to 'oil and gas' which may be contained
    in one lease and each such lease shall remain in
    effect as long after the expiration of its primary
    term as such mineral covered by such lease is pro-
    duced therefrom in paying quantities. The School
    Land Board shall fix the consideration for each
    such amendment; which shall not be less than Two
    Dollars ($2) per acre , 'provided that any such
    amendment shall not change the original consider-.
    atlcnin any lease to the extent that the state
    shall thereafter receive less than the original
    royalty provided in said leases. If the consider-
    ation so fixed is paid in cash within ninety (90)
    days after such consideration has been fixed, the
    Commissioner of the General Land Office shall
    execute and deliver to the owner of such lease
    an instrument evidencing such amendment., If the
    consideration is n&paid    within the ninety (90)
    days, the application shall be conclusively pre-
    sumed to have been withdrawn. This Act shall
    not authorize the Commissioner of the General
    Land Office or the School Land Board to change
    or amend the lease involved in any other respect."
    (Underlined portion only than e,by the amendment -
    8).,
    previously read October 1, 19f-i
    The intention of the Legislature is the law. 53 Tex.Jur.
    2d 180, Statutes, Sec. 12.5. The Act allows a new consideration
    for the benefit of the State in exchange for permitting the ex-
    tension amendment. The last sentence in Section 
    2, supra
    ,
    therefore, would not prohibit a change in the consideration.
    Had the legislature intended that consideration be only in the
    nature of a cash bonus, we believe that it uould have said so.
    At least, it would have been pointless to forbid royalty change
    only in a downward direction, if it were intended that no royalty
    change at'all was to be permitted. Negating a portion of the
    -1658-
    .   .-
    Hon. Jerry Sadler, Page 3 (c-349)
    right seems by implication to be an affirmation of the remain-
    der of the right. To held otherwise requires that the royalty
    provision in the statute,'for all practical purposes; be,given
    no effect whatever.
    In our opinion, the provision that the consideration
    must be paid in 90 days should be%construed as meaning only the
    "bonus" part of the consideration, as obviously royalties would
    probably be paid over a much longer period.o,ftime. When so
    construed, all parts of the statute are harmonized and every
    part of the statute is given meaning. This accords with standard
    rules of statutory construction. 53 Tex.Jur.2d 227 et seq.,
    Statutes, Sets. 159-60;
    Our conclusion is strengthened by the fact that the iden-
    tical provisions prior to the change of the cutoff date.were
    construed by the School Land Board as authorizing the royalty
    to be increased as part of the consideration for the amendment
    of leases, and the royalty in numerous leases was so increased.
    The Legislature, by the reenactment of these provisions in the
    1963 Act approved such construction. Isbell v. Gulf Union Oil
    co., 147'Ttx. 6, 
    209 S.W.2d 762
    (1948).
    You are therefore advised that the Board, in fixing the
    considera~tionfor a leasesamendment under Article 5344c, Vern-
    on% Civil Statutes, may increase the royalty provided in such
    lease in addition to charging the bonus provided in Article
    5344c.
    SUHHARY
    The,,SchoolLand Beard in permitting an
    amendment to an existing term least
    under Article 5344c, Vernon's Civil
    Statutes, may increase the royalty
    chargeable under such lease as a part
    of the censideration for such amtnd-
    ment.
    Yours very truly,
    WAGGONER CARR
    Attorney General
    JRtms
    -1659-
    --   .
    Hon. Jerry Sadler, page 4 (C-349)
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Milton Richardson
    Malcolm L. Quick
    Brady Coleman
    APPROVED F'ORTHE ATTORI'WYGENERAL
    By: Roger Tyler
    -1660-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-349

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1964

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017