Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1964 )


Menu:
  • Honorable J. M. Falkner               Opinion No. C-308
    State Banking Conusissioner
    John H. Reagan Office Building
    Austin, Texas
    Re: Whether concrete containers to
    enclose caskets in garden type
    cemeteries to prevent graves from
    settling, are funeral merchandise
    within the contemplation of Article
    548b, Vernon's Civil Statutes and
    -related questions.
    Dear Mr. Falkner:
    ~You have requested the opinion of this office on the
    following questions:
    ...
    1.   Are concrete containers suitable to enclose caskets
    In garden type cemeteries, to prevent graves .from
    settling; funeral merchand$s,ewithin the contern+
    plation of Article 548b, Vernon's Civil Statutes,
    asamended?
    2.   Assuming that said concrete containers are deemed
    funeral merchandise within the terms of Article
    548b, Vernon's Civi‘lStatutes, as amended, do said
    containers when fully paid and Installed-in a'
    grave space owned..bya purchaser become exempt as
    a ,crypt, niche, or mausoleum?
    3.   Is Article 548b(l), Vernon's Civil Statutes, which
    provides that delivery of funeral merchandise prior
    to death does not constitute performance In full
    or~in part of an installment contract for prepaid
    funeral benefits under the statutes, constitutional?
    4.   Under the provisions.of Article 548b, Vernon's Civil.
    Statutes, prior to the amendment in 1963, does mer-
    chandise of this type coristitute.prepaidfuneral
    merchandise requiring the deposit of payments received
    on contract to be deposited In a state,or national
    bank, or building and loan association in'this state
    for the benefit and protection of such purchasers?
    -1467-
    .   .                                               -   .
    Honorable J. M. Falkner, page 2 (c- 308)
    We answer your first question as follows:
    "Concrete containers", ,if they are to be included within
    the purview of Art. 548bz, Vernon's Civil Staiutes, must be within
    the meaning of the term funeral merchandise as used in Section
    1 of that Article.
    1
    Article 548b, Vernon's Civil Statutes, Sec. 1, provides
    in part as follows:                                           .
    11
    . . . Any individual, firm, partnership, corporation,-
    or association. . . , desiring to sell pre-arranged
    or prepaid fur-era1services or funeral merchandise
    (including caskets, grave vaults, and all other
    articles of merchandise incidental to a funeral
    service, but excluding grave lots, grave spaces,
    grave markers, monuments, tombstones, crypts, niches,
    and mausoleums) in this state, . . . shall obtain
    a permit from the State Ranking Department of this
    state authorizing the transaction of this type of
    business before conducting such business." (Emphasis
    added.)
    Funeral merchandise~is defined so as to include 'grave
    vaults"; however, Article 548b, Vernon's Civil Statutes, does
    not provide a specific definition of "grave vaults" nor do any
    .of'the reported cases contain such a delinition.
    In Sec. 1, of Article 912a, Vernon's Civil Statutes,~
    relattig~to perpetual care cemeteries, a grave is defined as,
    "a space'of ground in a burial park intended to be used for
    the permanent interment in the ground oft the remains of a deceased
    person."
    A standard reference work in the field of mortuary
    science defines-a "burial vault" as. "A tomb or receotacle
    in which a casket is placed for burial." Pasic Principles of
    -.'FuneralService, R. Victor Landig, 1956, p. 91. InModern
    Mortuary Science, John H. Eckels, 1948, a vault IS defined:
    worm                with vaulted roof,'an arched apt or
    chamber) rkfers to an outer case of concrete, metal, stone
    or brick.'
    From the above, we conclude that "grave vaults" include
    any container within which a casket might b.eplaced for burial,
    and you are therefore advised that "boncrete containers" are
    a type of "grave vault" 'andthus within the contemplation of
    Art. 548b, Vernon's Civil Statutes, aspfuneral merchandise.
    -1468-
    Honorable J. M.   Falkner,   page 3~(~-308)
    :Your second question asks whether the containers if
    fully paid for and Installed are exempt as crypts, niches,
    or mausoleums; from the regulation of prepaid or prearranged
    funeral merchandise described in Art. 548b, g 1'
    In'answering this question, we looked to definitions
    of crypt, 'niche,and mausoleum to determine if the "concrete    .,
    containers,"In question could everbe considered to be one
    of the& excluded.items.
    As in-question one, we find no definitions in Art.
    5486, of the terms; however, Art. 912a.-1,Vernon's Civil
    Statutes, provides assistance in determining the proper meaning
    to be'aseribed to the terms in that its definitions of the
    ttirms’ayeof long standing and unaltered byeamendment.
    "Mausoleum" Is defined in Art. 912a-1 as "' . ..a
    structure or building of most durable and lasting fireproof
    construction used, or Intended to be used,,for ,the permanent
    Interment in cryp:s.and vaults therein of the rzmains of
    .decetsed persons.   In that samesection "Crypt isdefined
    as, .'. . the'chamber in a mausoleum of sufficientsize to
    ktiremainsofaaeceased,
    inter t e uncrema e
    "Niche" is defined as' "~. .-a recess in's columbarlum,
    used, or intended to be used, for the permanent.intermentof
    the cremated remains of one or more deceased persons,."      '.
    IEmphasIs added throughout.) From a careful study of Art.
    :.548b;and of the defin&tions gleaned from Art. 912a-1, we
    conclude that concrete containers suitable to enclose caskets
    In garden type cemeteries are not items that ,couldbe
    crypts, niches, or mausoleums and thus exempt
    eqiiated~.with,
    from regulation of prepaid or prearranged funeral.merchandlse.
    ;
    Your third question Inquires Into the constitutionality
    of the last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 1 of
    Art. 548b, Acts.58th Deg., R.S. 1963, Ch.~496, ,p. 1304, h'l.
    The sentence in question reads as follows:'
    "Delivery of funeral merchandise prior to death
    shall not.constitute performance o'rfulfillment,,.
    either wholly or in part, of any prepaid,funeral
    benefits contract entered into after the effective
    'date of this amendatory Act." . .;.
    .:
    ...
    -146%
    ..
    Honorable J. M. Falkner, page .4 (C-308)
    The validity of regulation of pre-need sale of funeral
    merchandise has been widely litigated and in all but one
    jurisdiction
    ..   . .     such regulation has been held not to abridge either
    toe rlgnr zo contract or to be an unlawful exercise of.the
    police power. Falkner v. Memorial Gardens Association, 298
    'S.W. 2d 934, (Civ.App.-1957,
    Gardens Association, .Inc. v. Smith, 156 N.E. 2d ,5&7-3$!%.
    $05       .                           y. ~Jones,356 S.W. 2d
    .2&;~ (zuz~.?X.Ark. lqb ).
    In the Falkner 
    case, supra
    ; page 939, the contracts
    In question provided:
    "That at any.time after receipt of 'the full sum
    set'out above, upon,request of the Purchaser, his
    2                                           rchaser,
    his heirs or assigns; the above items enumerated
    and design&ted as purchased,wsubject to the follo,wing
    terms.,andconditions: * * 9,    (Emphasis added*)
    The reasoning behind the theory that an offer to 'deliver
    $fter full payment on demand of the purchaser.did not affect
    the-real nature of theAssociation,
    supra
    ; Reserve Vault Corporationv. 
    Jones; supra
    ; Memorial
    Gardens Association, Inc., v. 
    Smith, supra
    .
    '~.Your fourths&estlLm dsks wheth~ercontracts for "con-
    &ete containers" entered'into.prior to July 15,’ 1963.(the
    effeotive date of the latest amendment-to 'Art. $@b), are for
    preIjaidfuneralmerchandise and therefore subject to the
    deposit requirements of the pre-amendment article.    ,."
    In answer'to your first'question we held that"con-
    Crete containers' are funeral merchandise within the present
    provisions .of Art, .548b. After'a careful comparison of the
    apljlicable,pre-amendmentand.present portions of Art. 548b,
    Sec. 1, describing items to be Included within the scope of
    regulation a8 "funeral merchandise," we'find them to be the
    same, thus requiring that we reach an identical result in
    answering this portion of your fourth question.
    We have also scrutinized the deposit requirements
    and find them to be essentially the same but for the absence
    of the alternative provisions relatlng to contracts of insurance
    found in Section la of the current article.. ,,                ..
    .
    -1471-
    Honorable J. M. Falkner,'page 6 (C- 308)
    Section L.of Art. 548b, Vernon's Civil Statutes,
    '.~prior to the 1963 amendments, contained the provision that
    regulated contracts'were those where the merchandise was to
    be "delivered at an undetermined future date dependent upon
    the death of the contracting party. . ." In the Falkner
    case, ~supra.,
    where:the Court he,ldthat an offer to deliver did    ~
    not affect the real nature of the business regulated, the
    'contractprovision which we quoted in answer to your third
    questlon provided that:
    "That at any time after receipt of the full sum
    set out above, upon the request of the purchaser,
    6 . . it will deiiver to the purchaser,~. . . the
    above items. . .
    .Tn the instant case the contracts provide that:
    : ,.            "In the event'that cryptorium is not needed
    interment at the.time fully paid for, the company
    .~f.or                                                       .   t
    shall'deliver~.          cryptoriums to a bonded
    urarehouseand deliver a wa,rehouse.receipt $0 the
    -@urchaSer, .~. . and'keep 80 stored'until requested
    . .~         _ without further.,charge."
    .We have"harefuliy considered~these two contracti                r
    provisions and conclude that in.practlcal result-there.16 no
    diStinction between them. .In the instant case, the seller
    agrees t6 do at least two things before the contract can
    become fully ekecuted. ~F1rst.jseller agrees to provide an
    Ttem of personal property, 'i.e. a burial vault; secondly,.seller
    agrees to deliver to a'ceme.terywhen'requested,to do:so by
    the purchaser, his heirs or assigns; and thirdly, In some of
    the contracts, the seller agrees to "install for interment."
    When compared with the provision In the Falkner 
    case, supra
    ,
    just quoted, we are of the oplriionthat,m        contracts the
    seller simply makes an offer to perform upon request, which
    the Court in the~Falkner case held not to affect the real
    nature of the regiiii.     You are therefore advised that
    the contracts entered Into prior to the effective date of the
    1963 amendments to Article 548b,  veITiO?iS'
    Civil Statutes,
    were within the purview of that pre-amendment article, and
    thus the deposit requirements of that article must.be met.
    S U M M A R Y .'.
    --w-w--             .. -~
    (1) "Concretescontainers" to be used as burial vaults
    under the stated.facts, are funeral merchandise tilthin.
    the scope of both the pre-1963, and present version
    of Art. 548b, Vernon's Civil Statutes, and are thus
    subject to the deposit requirements of both articles.
    -1472-
    .   .*
    Honorable J. M. Falkner, page 7 (c-398)
    (2)    Under the stated facts "concrete containers"
    do not when fully paid for and installed become
    exempt as a crypt, niche, or mausoleum.
    The additi,onof the last sentence of the first
    paragraph in Section 1 of Art. 548b, Vernon's Civil
    Statutes, relating to .deliveryis constitutional.     '
    (4)    Merchandise of the .typediscussed constituted
    funeral merchandise requiring that deposit require-‘
    ments, of Art. 548b, Vernon's Civil Statutes, prior
    to the 1963 amendment, be complied with.
    Yours very.truly,
    WAGGONER CARR
    Attorney General of Texas
    l$iskkGL
    Assistant Attorney General
    RRR:sf
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTFE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Joe R. Long
    Paul Phy
    Pat Bailey
    George Gray
    APPROVRDFOR    THE ATRXNEY   GENERAL
    By:   Roger Tyler
    ‘.      ;:.
    . :,
    ‘.
    -14.73-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C-308

Judges: Waggoner Carr

Filed Date: 7/2/1964

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017