Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1962 )


Menu:
  • Honorable Fred E. West           Opinion No. WW-1500
    County Attorney
    Lubbock, Texas                   Re:   Taxation of property
    acquired by the Urban
    Renewal Agency under
    Dear Mr. West:                         the stated facts.
    You have requested an opinion on the following question
    copied from your request:
    "When the Urban Renewal Agency acquires
    property after the first of the year which
    has been lawfully assessed on the property
    tax rolls of the State and County Tax Col-
    lector, Is the tax collector required to
    remove said property from the tax rolls
    on the date of such acquisition and col-
    lect taxes from the private owner which
    have accrued to date of such acquisition,
    exempting the Urban Renewal Agency from
    taxation during the period of Its owner-
    ship?"
    Provided that the right of eminent domain by the city
    has been acquired as provided In Article 126gL-3, Section 10,
    the property would be subject to taxes for only that part of
    the year it is owned by the person who owned It as of January 1
    of the year in question. The person owning property on Janu-
    ary 1 would owe taxes for that part of the year before it was
    acquired by the city. Dlcklson vs. City of San Antonio, 
    349 S.W.2d 640
    (Civ. App. 1‘961,error ref. n.r.e.).
    The property after being acquired by the city would not
    be subject to a lien for prior taxes, and the property in question
    is exempt from ad valorem taxes as long as It is owned by the city
    and used for a public purpose. City of Marlin vs. State, 
    205 S.W.2d 809
    Clv. App. 1947). City of Houston vs. Garland, 
    264 S.W.2d 783
    tCiv. App. 1954, error ref. n.r.e.).
    Honorable Fred E. West, Page 2 (Opinion No. WW-1500)
    SUMMARY
    Property acquired by Urban Renewal Agency
    for City of Lubbock, to be used for public pur-
    poses, Is subject to state and county ad valorem
    taxes for only that portion of the year prior to
    the time acquired by the Urban Renewal Agency;
    and after being so acquired, It Is not subject
    to a lien for the taxes.
    Yours very truly,
    WILL WILSON
    By:J. H. Broadhurst
    Assistant Attorney General:
    JHB:pw
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Bill Allen
    Albert Pruett
    Sam Stone
    Scranton Jones
    REVIEMEDFORTHEATTORNEY     GENERAL
    By: Leonard Passmore
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-1500

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1962

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017