Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1962 )


Menu:
  •               E        ORNEY       GENERAL
    OF%-EXAS
    April 2, 1962
    Honorable William Hunter          Opinion No, NW-1294
    District Attorney
    69th Judicial District            Re:   Failure of candidate
    319 Denrock Avenue                      to pay assessment as
    Dalhart, Texas                          required by Art. 13.08
    and 13.15, Texas Election
    Dear Mr. Hunter:                        Code.
    You have asked the following question:
    "Article 13.08 of the Election Code pro-
    vides for determining the amount of assess-
    ment of the candidate and how that is paid,
    and further provides for the final date of
    payment. Art. 13.15 requires a filing fee
    to be paid before the name is placed on the
    ballot. If a candidate paid no assessment
    by the final hour and date, but is the only
    candidate for that position, should his name
    appear in the list of candidates on the ballot
    for that party in the November Election?"
    Article 13.08,Texas Election Code, reads in part
    as follows:
    "Prior to the assessment of the candidates,
    the county committee shall carefully estimate
    the cost of printing the official ballots,
    ..., compensation of election officers and
    clerks .... and all other necessary expenses
    of holding the general and second primaries
    in such county and on the second Monday in
    February preceding each primary, shall appor-
    tion such cost in such manner as in their judg-
    ment is just and equitable among the various
    candidates for nomination for district, county
    and precinct offices, only ... The committee
    shall, by resolution direct the chairman to
    immediately mail to each person against whom
    an assessment is made a statement of the amount
    of such expenses apportioned to him, with the
    request that he pay the same to the county
    chairman on or before the Saturday before the
    Honorable William Hunter, Page 2     Opinion No. WW-1294
    third Monday in February thereafter. Candi-
    dates filing subsequently shall pay the same
    assessment prescribed for other candidates
    for the office they seek, and shall have
    one (1) week from the date they file in
    which to pay said assessment. It shall be
    sufficient to meet the requirements of this
    law to mail by registered letter to the
    chairman before the deadline herein provided,
    as shown by the postmark on the letter, a money
    order, a certified check, or a good personal
    check."
    Article 13.08a, Texas Election Code, which is applicable
    only to counties having a population of 800,000 or more inhabitants,
    appears to be more stringent in its terms than Art. 13.08, since
    Art. 13.08a states, "The application and payment must be delivered
    to the proper party chairman or secretary by the deadline for
    making application for a place on the ballot, and it shall not be
    sufficient for the application and payment to have been mailed
    before the deadline unless they are actually delivered by the
    deadline." ,&&phasis addedJ    Article 13.0tIais not involved in
    this opinion.
    Section (a) of Article 13.15, Texas Election Code, with
    reference to the Primary, reads as follows:
    "No person's name shall be placed on the
    ballot for a district, county or precinct
    office who has not paid to the county
    executive committee the amount of the
    estimated expense of holding such primary
    apportioned to him by the county executive
    committee as hereinbefore provided."
    Art. 6.01, Texas Election Code, in referring to the ballot
    to be used in a General Election, states:
    I,
    The names shall appear on the
    balioi &der the head of the party that
    nominates them. I . ."
    We assume from your question that you
    . are ".
    referring
    .   to
    candidates for district, county ana precinct ofsice wno are
    required by law to pay their assessment to the chairman of the
    county executive committee, and not to candidates for state office
    or for the Court of Civil Appeals or Congressman at Large, who
    pay their filing fees to the state executive committee.
    Honorable William Hunter,   Page 3      Opinion No. WW-1294
    It has been held in King v. Fitch, 
    181 S.W.2d 926
    (Civ.
    X App. 1944) and Fisher v. Dallas County Democratic Executive
    Committee, 333 SW2d bo4 (Civ. APP., 1960) that payment of the
    assessment two days after the deadline and one day after the
    deadline, respectively, was substantial compliance with the
    statute. But nowhere do we find that an announced candidate
    may wholly fail to pay any assessment at all, and still be
    entitled to have his name placed on the primary ballot. To
    hold that such was the law would be contrary to the language
    of the statute, and would prevent the holding of any primary
    at all, since the assessments pay the expenses of the primary.
    Your question skips over the primary and goes to the General
    Election to be held in November. Certainly, no candidate's
    name should appear as a nominee of his party on the General
    Election ballot, if he is not selected as a nominee in the
    primary except in cases of death of the nominee as provided
    in Art. A .22, Election Code). Of course the voters may select
    a nominee by write-in votes. But in the situation you have
    outlined in your first question, the candidate has filed his
    application for a place on the party ballot for the general
    primary, and has not paid his assessment. We hold, therefore,
    in answer to your question that if the candidate will not make
    substantial compliance with Art. 13.15, Texas Election Code,
    his name cannot appear on the primary ballot. If, thereafter,
    he is not chosen *by the voters as their nominee by write-in
    votes in the primary, his name cannot appear in the party
    column on the General Election ballot as the nominee of the
    party, as provided in Art. 6.01, Texas Election Code.
    You have also asked the following question:
    "If a party holds primary elections only
    in part of the precincts in a county, but not
    all, can or must a winning candidate's names
    for that party appear on the November ballot?"
    This question has already been answered by Attorney General's
    Opinion No. V-1529, written in 1952 to County Attorney R. C.
    Marshall of Hutchinson County, copy of which opinion is enclosed,
    Your third question reads:
    "Can a person convicted of a felony, who,
    thereunder, served a penitentiary sentence and
    had not received a pardon, have his name on the
    Election Ballot, and if elected, is such candidate
    qualified to hold the office?"
    This last uestion has been answered by Attorney General's
    Opinion No. O-2;t
    98, written in 1940 to County Attorney J. W.
    Strawn of Willacy County, copy of which is enclosed.
    Honorable William Hunter, Page ;4       Opinion No. WW-1294
    SUMMARY
    A candidate who files for district,
    county or precinct office, and who refuses
    to pay the assessment set by the county
    executive committee, is not eligible to
    have his name printed on the ballot for the
    general primary, as provided by Art. 13.15,
    Texas Election Code.
    Only the nominees of the party are
    entitled to appear in the party column on
    the General Election ballot. Art. 6.01,
    Texas Election Code.
    Yours very truly,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney General of Texas
    By: @%      ++=
    Riley Eugene Fletcher
    Assistant
    REF/cm
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE:
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Elmer McVey
    Morgan Nesbitt
    Gordon Zuber
    Pat Bailey
    REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL:
    By: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-1294

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1962

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017