Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1961 )


Menu:
  •                            OF         EXAS
    September 21, 1961
    Honorable Henry Wade            Opinion No. WW-1150
    Criminal District Attorney
    Dallas, Texas                   Re:   Whether the Commissioners
    Court of Dallas County has
    the authority to acquire a
    lien on real estate owned
    by persons whom the Dallas
    County Department of Public
    Welfare has determined to
    be paupers under the stand-
    ards approved by the Com-
    Dear Mr. Wade:                        missioners Court.
    Your request for an opinion proposes the following:
    Whether the Commissioners Court of
    Dallas County has the authority to acquire
    a lien on real estate owned by persons
    whom the Dallas County Department of
    Public Welfare has determined to be
    paupers under the standards approved
    by the Commissioners Court.
    Article 2351, Vernon's Civil Statutes, prescribes
    the powers and duties of the Commissioners Court insofar as
    they relate to paupers. This Article provides in part as
    follows:
    "Each Commissioners Court shall:
    It
    . . .
    "11. Provide for the support of paupers
    and such idiots and lunatics as cannot be ad-
    mitted into the lunatic asylum, residents of
    their county, who are unable to support
    themselves. By the term resident as used
    herein, is meant a person who has been a
    bona fide inhabitant of the county not
    less than six months and of the State not
    less than one year.
    "12.    Provide for the burial of
    paupers.
    Honorable Henry Wade, page 2 (WW-1150)
    11               II
    .       .   .
    Nowhere in the foregoing Article is there any
    wording which would create an obligation on the part of a
    pauper to secure by lien or to otherwise repay or reimburse
    the county in whole or in part for public funds expended for
    his support. A lien on either personal or real property
    arises only by virtue of a contract or some statutory pro-
    vision. 28 Tex.Jur. 7, Liens, Sec. 4.
    Also, Commissioners Courts are of limited juris-
    diction in that their authority extends only to matters
    pertaining to the welfare of their respective counties and
    their powers are only those that are expressly or impliedly
    conferred upon them b the Constitution or statutes of the
    State. 11B Tex.Jur. Fl3, Counties, Sec. 65.
    In addition, the case of Willacv County v. Valley
    Baptist Hospital, 
    29 S.W.2d 457
    (Civ.App. 1930) held:
    II
    0The powers and duties of county
    .   a
    commissioners courts, and the obligations
    of the counties to paupers, are fixed by
    statute, and cannot be enlarged upon by
    unnecessary implication. These powers
    and duties, in so far as applicable here,
    are defined in and restricted by the
    provisions of articles 2351 and 4438,
    Rev.St. 1925. In article 2351 it is pro-
    vided that each commissioners court shall
    (subdivision 11) 'provide for the support
    of paupers . . . residents of their county,
    who ase unable to support themselves,'
    . . .
    The language quoted above states the proposition
    that Section 11 of Article 2351, Vernon's Civil Statutes,
    creates an obligation on the part of the Commdssioners Courts
    of this state to provide for the support of paupers resident
    within their respective counties and it in no way creates
    a corresponding obligation on the part of paupers to repay
    or otherwise secure payment of funds which may have been
    expended in their behalf under the authority of Section 11.
    Furthermore, Attorney General Opinion No. 0-6570-A held that
    the State Department of Public Welfare did not have the
    authority to accept repayment of old age assistance grants
    from a qualified recipient because the Legislature had not
    authorized this Department to accept such a repayment. Like-
    wise, there is no statutory authority providing for any type
    of repayment by paupers to a County Department of Public
    Honorable Henry Wade, page 3 (ww-1150)
    Welfare.
    If the person that the Dallas County Depart-
    ment has determined to be a pauper, is in fact not a
    wwr,    we are not passing upon the right of the County
    to litigate this fact question and the right of the
    County to recover by judgment any sums spent in supporting
    a person, who in fact was not a pauper.
    SUMMARY
    The Commissioners Court of Dallas
    County does not have the authority
    to acquire a lien on real estate
    owned by paupers whom the Dallas
    County Department of Public Wel-
    fare has determined to be paupers
    under the standards approved by
    the Commissioners Court.
    Yours very truly,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney General of Texas
    1RW:ds:lgh
    I. Raymond ~lliams,   Jr.
    Assistant
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. Geppert, Chairman
    Henry G. Braswell
    Joe B. McMaster
    H. Grady Chandler
    W. Ray Scruggs
    REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    BY: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-1150

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1961

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017