-
E TTOENEEU GENE- OFTE~AS September 19, 1961 Honorable Guilford L. Jones Opinion No. WW-1143 District Attorney County Courthouse Re: Whether in a jury wheel Big Spring, Texas county, where the court has granted a motion for a special venire in a capital case, and where the venire as drawn from the wheel, is exhausted, additional veniremen are drawn.from the wheel, or are summoned as talesmen Dear Mr. Jones: by the sheriff? Your request for the opinion of this office reads in part as follows: "In a jury wheel county, where the court had granted a motion for a special venire in a capital case, and where the venire as drawn from the wheel, is exhausted, are additional veniremen drawn from the wheel, or are they summoned as talesmen by the sheriff? "This case seems to be governed by Article 596 C.C.P. It is the opinion of the undersigned that the words 'and upon such refusal' in Article 601-A limits this Statute in its application to those cases where the court has refused a motion for special venire. "In Coy v. State 2S8 SW2d '782,the court held that additional veniremen should have been drawn from the wheel. In Moon v. State
331 S.W.2d 312, the court indicates that Coy is no longer the law and that 601-A now requires talesmen to be selected by the sheriff." Article 601-A, V.C.C.P., was amended in Chapter 327, Acts of the 55th Legislature, R.S., 1957. Honorable Guilford L. Jones, Page 2 WV-1143 1 It now reads as follows: "In all counties of this State where jurors in either civil or criminal cases are drawn from a jury wheel as is now provided or may hereafter be provided by law and where as many as one hundred (100) jurors have been summoned in such county for regular service for the week in which such capital case is set for trial, the Judge of the Court having jurisdiction of a capital case in which a motion for a special venire has been made, shall grant or refuse such motion for a special venire and upon such refusal require the case to be tried by regular jurors summoned for service in such county for regular service for the week in which such capital case is set for trial and such additional talesmen as may be summoned by the Sheriff upon order of the Court as provided in Article 596of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but the Clerk of such Court shall furnish the defendant or his counsel a list of the persons summoned for jury service for such week upon application therefor." The amendatory Act in 1957 recited in finding that an emergency existed: "The fact that confusion exists over the proper method of selecting jurors in capital criminal cases and the need forthislegislation for the speedy administration of justice create an emergency. D 0" Article 596, V.C.C.P., reads as follows: "On failure from any cause to select a jury from those summoned upon the special venire, the court shall order the sheriff to summon any number of .men that it may deem advfsable, for the for- mation of the jury*" If a special venfre is exhausted, the Sheriff is to be sent for talesmen. Art. 596,V.C,C.P. If a special venire is refused, in a county to which Article 601-A, V.C,C,P. applies, the jury shall be chosen from among the: 11 0 0 0 regular jurors summoned for service in Honorable Guilford L. Jones, Page 3 (WW-1143) such county for regular service for the week in which such capital case is set for trial a . 011 If these jurors are exhausted, Art. 601-A, V.C.C.P. provides that talesmen shall be summoned as provided in Art. 596V.C.C.P. It follows that in a capitaicase in a jury wheel county, when the first panel of jurors is exhausted, whether drawn as a special venire or from regular sources, the procedure to be followed is as set forth in Art. 596,that is, that the sheriff should summon such additional talesmen as are needed to complete the jury. Moon v. State, 331 S0W.2d 312 (Tex.Crim. 1960.) SUMMARY In a jury wheel county, where the court has granted a motion for a special venire in a capital case, and where the venire as drawn from the wheel, is exhausted, additional venire- men are tombe summoned as talesmen by the sheriff. Sincerely yours, WILL WILSON FG John E. Leonarz Assistant Attorney General JEL/br APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE: W. V. Geppert, Chairman Riley Eugene Fletcher J. C. Davis Sam Wilson Elmer McVey REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: ~Houghton Brownlee
Document Info
Docket Number: WW-1143
Judges: Will Wilson
Filed Date: 7/2/1961
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017