Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1961 )


Menu:
  •              THEA~TORNEYGENERLAL
    OF TEXAS
    &A&     29-J        v.c.s
    April 12, 1961
    Honorable Ted Schulz   '              Opinion No. WW-1038
    County Attorney
    Fort Bend County                      Re:   Whether a person who refuses on
    Richmond, Texas                             February 1, 1961 to answer the
    census trustee as to a child
    under his control and who is
    within~the prescribed age, is
    subject to be prosecuted for
    such failure under the pro-
    viiions of Article 294'of
    Dear Mr. Schulz:                            Vernon's Penal Code
    You have requested the opinion of this office as to whether the re-
    fusal of a person to enumerate his eligible children for school census
    purposes on February 1, 1961, can form the basis of a criminal prosecution
    for violation of Article 294, Vernon's Penal Code.
    Article 294, Vernon's Penal Code, reads as fo$lows:
    "Every person having control of any child which
    will be over seven and under seventeen years of age
    on the first of September next thereafter and who,
    being requested by the census trustee to prepare the
    form prescribed by law giving the information showing
    the name, sex and date of birth of each child of which
    he has control and which is within said ages, or to
    give the information necessary to enable the trustee
    to prepare the same, shall refuse to do so, or shall
    refuse to make oath to such form when filled according
    to his statement of facts in regard to said children,
    or shall fail to return the form left at his home in
    his absence to the census trustee as required by law,
    shall be fined not less than five nor more than ten
    dollars."
    There is nothing in Article 294 which limits its operation to the
    month of January, and if there be such a limitation it must occur else-
    whereAn the statutes. That portion of our laws dealing with the taking
    of the school-census is enumerated in Article 2816, Vernon's Civil Statutes,
    which reads in relevant part as follows:
    "The census trustee, between the first day of January
    and the first day of February after his appointment,
    Hon. Ted Schulz, Page 2,   (WW-1038)
    shall take a census of all children that will be over
    six and under eighteen years of age on the first day
    of the following September, and who are residents of
    the school district on said first day of February,"
    If Article 2816 were intended by the Legislature to operate as a limi-
    tation on Article 294 of the Penal Code, then it would be necessary to
    determine that the use of the word "between" was intended as exclusive
    of the enumerated boundary dates.
    In the view we take of the question presented by your request,
    the determination of this matter will not be necessary.
    The use of the word "shall" is usuallv mandatorv when used in
    statutes, Brinkley v. St;ate, 
    320 S.W.2d 855
    ITex. Grim. lp59), but our
    Supreme Court has held in a long line of decisions that this word must
    be considered in the light of the remainder of the statute and the intent
    of the legislature. Chisolm v. Bew&ey Mills, 
    155 Tex. 400
    , 
    287 S.W.2d 943
    (1956); Thomas v. Groebl, 
    147 Tex. 70
    , 
    212 S.W.2d 625
    (1948); Markosky v.
    Newman, 
    134 Tex. 440
    , 
    136 S.W.2d 808
    (1940); Federal Crude Oil Co. vi
    Yount-Lee oil CO., 
    122 Tex. 21
    , 
    52 S.W.2d 56
    (1932).
    Approximately one quarter of the funds expended on primary and
    secondary public education in this state comes out of the state treasury
    and is distributed among the several school districts according to the re-
    sults of the school census. Without the basic information derived from the
    census, this distribution of funds would fall into chaos and confusion. For
    this reason, the Legislature must have intended their words, 'The census
    trustee, between the first day of January and the first day of February . . .
    shall-take a census . o .IIto be directory only and not mandatory, because
    the contrary interpretation could leave an unfinished census with no means
    of completion. For the same reason we conclude that the sanctions imposed
    by Article 294, Vernon's Penal Code, are as valid on the first day of
    February as they would be on any day in January, and that a prosecution
    based on the refusal of a person to answer the questionaire of the census
    trustee on the first day of February, would be a proper one.
    SUMMARY
    A person who refuses on February 1, 1961.to answer
    the census trustee as to a child under his control
    and who is within the prescribed age, is subject to
    be prosecuted for such failure under the provisions
    of Article 294 of Vernon's Penal Code.
    Hon. Ted Schulz, Page 3   (``-1038)
    Very truly yours,
    WILL WILSON
    Attorney General of Texas
    John E. Leonarz
    Assistant Attorney General
    JEL:br
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    W. V. GEPPEXT, Chairnan
    W. Ray Scruggs
    Maston Courtney
    Linward Shivers
    REVIEWEDFORTHEATTORNFIG~L
    BY: Morgan Nesbitt
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WW-1038

Judges: Will Wilson

Filed Date: 7/2/1961

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017